Literature DB >> 18544580

The hCG ratio can predict the ultimate viability of the intrauterine pregnancies of uncertain viability in the pregnancy of unknown location population.

Tommaso Bignardi1, George Condous, Dalya Alhamdan, Emma Kirk, Ben Van Calster, Sabine Van Huffel, Dirk Timmerman, Tom Bourne.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To determine whether hCG ratio at 48 h can predict ultimate viability of intrauterine pregnancies of uncertain viability (IPUVs) in the pregnancy of unknown location (PUL) population.
METHODS: Prospective observational study from June 2001 to October 2004. All women classified with PUL had serum hCG levels measured at 0 and 48 h to calculate hCG ratio (hCG 48/hCG 0 h). All women were followed up until final diagnosis: failing PUL, viable and non-viable intrauterine pregnancy (IUP), ectopic pregnancy. Those PULs found to have an IPUV at follow-up transvaginal ultrasound scan (TVS) were included in final analysis.
RESULTS: During the study period, 12,572 consecutive first trimester women were scanned. One thousand and three (8%) women were classified PULs. Three hundred and seventy-nine (37.8%) PULs were confirmed IPUVs at follow-up scan. Complete data from 334 IPUVs were analyzed: 82.6% (276/334) viable IUPs and 17.4% (58/334) non-viable IUPs. Median hCG ratio was greater in viable IUPs [2.32, inter-quartile range (IQR) 1.16-4.77] compared with non-viable IUPs 1.83 (IQR 0.97-4.60). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, positive and negative likelihood ratios of an hCG ratio >2.00 for the prediction of a viable IUP are 77.2%, 95.8%, 86.6%, 90.9%, 15.5, 0.24, respectively. In our population, an hCG ratio >2.00 increases the odds for a viable IUP from 0.42 to 6.46 post-test.
CONCLUSIONS: The hCG ratio is significantly higher in those IPUVs which become viable IUPs compared with non-viable IUPs. New cut-offs for the hCG ratio need to be evaluated for the prediction of viability in the IPUV group of PULs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18544580     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/den221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  6 in total

1.  The clinical performance of the M4 decision support model to triage women with a pregnancy of unknown location as at low or high risk of complications.

Authors:  S Bobdiwala; S Guha; B Van Calster; F Ayim; N Mitchell-Jones; M Al-Memar; H Mitchell; C Stalder; C Bottomley; A Kothari; D Timmerman; T Bourne
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 2.  Pregnancy of unknown location.

Authors:  Gökhan Boyraz; Gürkan Bozdağ
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2013-06-01

3.  Does a prediction model for pregnancy of unknown location developed in the UK validate on a US population?

Authors:  K T Barnhart; M D Sammel; D Appleby; M Rausch; T Molinaro; B Van Calster; E Kirk; G Condous; S Van Huffel; D Timmerman; T Bourne
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  The potential value of activin B and fibronectin for the triage of pregnancies of unknown location and prediction of first trimester viability.

Authors:  Maya Al-Memar; Shabnam Bobdiwala; Mayank Madhra; Srdjan Saso; Bavo De Cock; Ben Van Calster; Jeremy K Brown; Faizah Mukri; Cecilia Bottomley; Aris Papageorghiou; Dirk Timmerman; Andrew W Horne; Tom Bourne
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2018-04-25

5.  The term "pregnancy of unknown location" is here to stay.

Authors:  George Condous; Simon Winder; Shannon Reid
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-12-31

6.  Predicting Ectopic Pregnancy Using Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG) Levels and Main Cause of Infertility in Women Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Treatment: Retrospective Observational Cohort Study.

Authors:  Huiyu Xu; Guoshuang Feng; Yuan Wei; Ying Feng; Rui Yang; Liying Wang; Hongxia Zhang; Rong Li; Jie Qiao
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2020-04-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.