Literature DB >> 18544475

Clinical evaluation of medicinal products for acceleration of fracture healing in patients with osteoporosis.

Jörg Goldhahn1, Wim H Scheele, Bruce H Mitlak, Eric Abadie, Per Aspenberg, Peter Augat, Maria-Luisa Brandi, Nansa Burlet, Arkadi Chines, Pierre D Delmas, Isabelle Dupin-Roger, Dominique Ethgen, Beate Hanson, Florian Hartl, John A Kanis, Reshma Kewalramani, Andrea Laslop, David Marsh, Sif Ormarsdottir, René Rizzoli, Art Santora, Gerhard Schmidmaier, Michael Wagener, Jean-Yves Reginster.   

Abstract

Pre-clinical studies indicate that pharmacologic agents can augment fracture union. If these pharmacologic approaches could be translated into clinical benefit and offered to patients with osteoporosis or patients with other risks for impaired fracture union (e.g. in subjects with large defects or open fractures with high complication rate), they could provide an important adjunct to the treatment of fractures. However, widely accepted guidelines are important to encourage the conduct of studies to evaluate bioactive substances, drugs, and new agents that may promote fracture union and subsequent return to normal function. A consensus process was initiated to provide recommendations for the clinical evaluation of potential therapies to augment fracture repair in patients with meta- and diaphyseal fractures. Based on the characteristics of fracture healing and fixation, the following study objectives of a clinical study may be appropriate: a) acceleration of fracture union, b) acceleration of return to normal function and c) reduction of fracture healing complications. The intended goal(s) should determine subsequent study methodology. While an acceleration of return to normal function or a reduction of fracture healing complications in and of themselves may be sufficient primary study endpoints for a phase 3 pivotal study, acceleration of fracture union alone is not. Radiographic evaluation may either occur at multiple time points during the healing process with the aim of measuring the time taken to reach a defined status (e.g. cortical bridging of three cortices or disappearance of fracture lines), or could be obtained at a single pre-determined timepoint, were patients are expected to reach a common clinical milestone (i.e. pain free full weight-bearing in weight-bearing fracture cases). Validated Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO's) measures will need to support the return to normal function co-primary endpoints. If reduction of complication rate (e.g. non-union) is the primary objective, the anticipated complications must be defined in the study protocol, along with their possible associations with the specified fracture type and fixation device. The study design should be randomized, parallel, double-blind, and placebo-controlled, and all fracture subjects should receive a standardized method of fracture fixation, defined as Standard of Care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18544475     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2008.04.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  19 in total

Review 1.  Special Review: Accelerating fracture repair in humans: a reading of old experiments and recent clinical trials.

Authors:  Per Aspenberg
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2013-01-09

2.  Local erythropoietin injection in tibiofibular fracture healing.

Authors:  Hooman Bakhshi; Gholamhossein Kazemian; Mohammad Emami; Ali Nemati; Hossein Karimi Yarandi; Farshad Safdari
Journal:  Trauma Mon       Date:  2013-01-15

Review 3.  Overview of skeletal repair (fracture healing and its assessment).

Authors:  Elise F Morgan; Anthony De Giacomo; Louis C Gerstenfeld
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2014

4.  Parameters for defining efficacy in fracture healing.

Authors:  Tamas Shisha
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2010-01

5.  Pharmacological agents and bone healing.

Authors:  Umberto Tarantino; Irene Cerocchi; Monica Celi; Alessandro Scialdoni; Luca Saturnino; Elena Gasbarra
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2009-05

6.  Comparison between real-world practice and application of the FRAX algorithm in the treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Francesca Zoccarato; Chiara Ceolin; Caterina Trevisan; Anna Citron; Labjona Haxhiaj; Aurelio Guarnaccia; Matteo Panozzo; Carlotta Campodall'Orto; Alessandra Coin; Sandro Giannini; Giuseppe Sergi
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 4.481

7.  Teriparatide improves early callus formation in distal radial fractures.

Authors:  Per Aspenberg; Torsten Johansson
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Current Aspects of Fragility Fracture Repair.

Authors:  Stefan Grote; Wolfgang Boecker; Wolf Mutschler; Matthias Schieker
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2008-11-24       Impact factor: 3.693

9.  Serum proteomic assessment of the progression of fracture healing.

Authors:  Amira I Hussein; Christian Mancini; Kyle E Lybrand; Margaret E Cooke; Heather E Matheny; Brenna L Hogue; Paul Tornetta; Louis C Gerstenfeld
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Histological changes in the fracture callus following the administration of water extract of piper sarmentosum (daun kadok) in estrogen-deficient rats.

Authors:  Mohamed Abdalla Estai; Ima Nirwana Soelaiman; Ahmad Nazrun Shuid; Srijit Das; Aishah Mohd Ali; Farihah Hj Suhaimi
Journal:  Iran J Med Sci       Date:  2011-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.