Literature DB >> 18543714

Target-absent controls in blocking experiments with rats.

Kathleen M Taylor1, Victory T Joseph, Peter D Balsam, M E Bitterman.   

Abstract

In three between-groups blocking experiments with rats, two concurrent and one forward, several common control procedures were employed: Reinforced trials with the putative blocking stimulus were either omitted entirely (Kamin control), replaced by unsignaled reinforcements (Wagner control), or replaced by reinforced trials with a different stimulus (C+ control). In each experiment, parallel treatments with the target stimulus absent during training served to examine the possibility that differential responding in tests with the target stimulus might be traced solely to differential exposure to the nontarget stimuli. In Experiment 1, responding by a concurrent blocking group during the test was no different than responding by a Kamin control group, and responding by a Wagner control group was greater than that of either of the other groups--a pattern of results, mirrored in the performance of the target-absent groups, that could be attributed to the elevation of contextual excitation by unsignaled reinforcement. In Experiment 2, responding in the test by a concurrent blocking group was no different than that by a C+ control group. In Experiment 3, a finding of less responding by a forward blocking group than by a C+ control group when the target stimulus was present during training, but not when it was absent, provided plausible evidence of blocking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18543714      PMCID: PMC4864974          DOI: 10.3758/lb.36.2.145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  4 in total

1.  Backward blocking in honeybees.

Authors:  R E Blaser; P A Couvillon; M E Bitterman
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2004-10

2.  Blocking and pseudoblocking: new control experiments with honeybees.

Authors:  R E Blaser; P A Couvillon; M E Bitterman
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.143

3.  Opioid receptors in the midbrain periaqueductal gray regulate prediction errors during pavlovian fear conditioning.

Authors:  Gavan P McNally; Sindy Cole
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.912

4.  The olfactory memory of the honeybee Apis mellifera. II. Blocking between odorants in binary mixtures.

Authors:  B H Smith; S Cobey
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.312

  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  Backward blocking in first-order conditioning.

Authors:  Kouji Urushihara; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2010-04

2.  Failures to replicate blocking are surprising and informative-Reply to Soto (2018).

Authors:  Elisa Maes; Angelos-Miltiadis Krypotos; Yannick Boddez; Joaquín Matías Alfei Palloni; Rudi D'Hooge; Jan De Houwer; Tom Beckers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2018-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.