Literature DB >> 16556559

Blocking and pseudoblocking: new control experiments with honeybees.

R E Blaser1, P A Couvillon, M E Bitterman.   

Abstract

Prompted by doubts about the adequacy of the various control procedures long used in research on blocking, we repeated some earlier experiments with honeybees that had given the appearance of forward, concurrent, and backward blocking. The new experiments differed from the earlier experiments only in that the target stimulus was omitted during the training and was encountered for the first time in the test. In the new experiments, just as in the earlier experiments, the blocking groups responded less to the target stimulus than did the control groups. The results show that the effects of the different treatments of nontarget stimuli commonly compared in blocking experiments may generalize to the target stimulus and thus affect responding to that stimulus independently of experience with it. Implications for research on blocking in honeybees and other animals are considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16556559     DOI: 10.1080/17470210500242938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  10 in total

1.  Target-absent controls in blocking experiments with rats.

Authors:  Kathleen M Taylor; Victory T Joseph; Peter D Balsam; M E Bitterman
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Backward blocking in first-order conditioning.

Authors:  Kouji Urushihara; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2010-04

3.  Agency rescues competition for credit assignment among predictive cues from adverse learning conditions.

Authors:  Mihwa Kang; Ingrid Reverte; Stephen Volz; Keith Kaufman; Salvatore Fevola; Anna Matarazzo; Fahd H Alhazmi; Inmaculada Marquez; Mihaela D Iordanova; Guillem R Esber
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Blocking and pseudoblocking: the reply of Rattus norvegicus to Apis mellifera.

Authors:  David Guez; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.143

5.  Within-subjects experiments on blocking and facilitation in honeybees (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  R E Blaser; P A Couvillon; M E Bitterman
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.231

6.  Critical evidence for the prediction error theory in associative learning.

Authors:  Kanta Terao; Yukihisa Matsumoto; Makoto Mizunami
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  The Transition to Minimal Consciousness through the Evolution of Associative Learning.

Authors:  Zohar Z Bronfman; Simona Ginsburg; Eva Jablonka
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-12-22

Review 8.  Roles of Octopamine and Dopamine Neurons for Mediating Appetitive and Aversive Signals in Pavlovian Conditioning in Crickets.

Authors:  Makoto Mizunami; Yukihisa Matsumoto
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  Failures to replicate blocking are surprising and informative-Reply to Soto (2018).

Authors:  Elisa Maes; Angelos-Miltiadis Krypotos; Yannick Boddez; Joaquín Matías Alfei Palloni; Rudi D'Hooge; Jan De Houwer; Tom Beckers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2018-04

10.  Application of a Prediction Error Theory to Pavlovian Conditioning in an Insect.

Authors:  Makoto Mizunami; Kanta Terao; Beatriz Alvarez
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-07-23
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.