Literature DB >> 18543013

Parametric subject-specific model for in vivo 3D reconstruction using bi-planar X-rays: application to the upper femoral extremity.

A Baudoin1, W Skalli, J A de Guise, D Mitton.   

Abstract

Although feasibility of accurate 3D reconstruction of the proximal epiphysis of the femur from biplanar X-rays (frontal and lateral) has been assessed, in vivo application is limited due to bone superposition. The aim of this study was to propose a specific algorithm to get accurate and reproducible, low dose in vivo 3D reconstruction. To achieve this goal, a parametric subject-specific model was introduced as a priori knowledge. This geometric model was based on a database based on proximal epiphysis of 60 femurs. The accuracy was estimated using comparisons to CT scans on 13 cadaveric femurs, then in vivo intra- and inter- observer reproducibility was assessed using a set of 23 femurs. The mean for the relative difference was 0.2 mm for the in vitro 3D accuracy. The mean error was 1.0 mm with maximum value of 5.1 mm in ideal conditions (in vitro). The confidence interval for the inter-observer reproducibility was within +/-2.2 mm. This method gave us a reproducible tool in order to get in vivo 3D reconstructions of the femur proximal epiphysis from biplanar X-rays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18543013     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-008-0353-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  19 in total

1.  Incorporating a statistically based shape model into a system for computer-assisted anterior cruciate ligament surgery.

Authors:  M Fleute; S Lavallée; R Julliard
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 2.  Current techniques of computed tomography. Helical CT, multidetector CT, and 3D reconstruction.

Authors:  Koenraad J Mortele; Jeffrey McTavish; Pablo R Ros
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.126

3.  3D/2D registration and segmentation of scoliotic vertebrae using statistical models.

Authors:  Said Benameur; Max Mignotte; Stefan Parent; Hubert Labelle; Wafa Skalli; Jacques de Guise
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.790

4.  Three-dimensional lower extremity alignment assessment system: application to evaluation of component position after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Takashi Sato; Yoshio Koga; Go Omori
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Fast accurate stereoradiographic 3D-reconstruction of the spine using a combined geometric and statistic model.

Authors:  Vincent Pomero; David Mitton; Sébastien Laporte; Jacques A de Guise; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.063

6.  3D biplanar statistical reconstruction of scoliotic vertebrae.

Authors:  S Benameur; M Mignotte; S Parent; H Labelle; W Skalli; J A de Guise
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2002

7.  Low-dose computed tomography: a solution for in vivo medical imaging and accurate patient-specific 3D bone modeling?

Authors:  Serge Van Sint Jan; Stéphane Sobzack; Pierre-Michel Dugailly; Véronique Feipel; Philippe Lefèvre; Jean-Louis Lufimpadio; Patrick Salvia; Marco Viceconti; Marcel Rooze
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 2.063

8.  3D reconstruction of the proximal femur with low-dose digital stereoradiography.

Authors:  A Le Bras; S Laporte; V Bousson; D Mitton; J A De Guise; J D Laredo; W Skalli
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2004

9.  Four-dimensional model of the lower extremity after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yoshito Otake; Naoki Suzuki; Asaki Hattori; Keisuke Hagio; Nobuhiko Sugano; Kazuo Yonenobu; Takahiro Ochi
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-12-13       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: relationships linking geometric and densitometric variables to bone strength. Role for compact bone.

Authors:  V Bousson; A Le Bras; F Roqueplan; Y Kang; D Mitton; S Kolta; C Bergot; W Skalli; E Vicaut; W Kalender; K Engelke; J-D Laredo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-03-18       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  8 in total

1.  Semi-automated stereoradiographic upper limb 3D reconstructions using a combined parametric and statistical model: a preliminary study.

Authors:  F Lebailly; L V P C Lima; A Clairemidi; B Aubert; S Guerard; Y Chaibi; J de Guise; C Fontaine; W Skalli
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Quantitative topographic anatomy of the femoral ACL footprint: a micro-CT analysis.

Authors:  Danielle G Norman; Alan Getgood; John Thornby; Jonathan Bird; Glen A Turley; Tim Spalding; Mark A Williams
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Three-dimensional morphologic study of the child's hip: which parameters are reproducible?

Authors:  Virginie Rampal; Jérome Hausselle; Patricia Thoreux; Philippe Wicart; Waffa Skalli
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Influence of patient axial malpositioning on the trueness and precision of pelvic parameters obtained from 3D reconstructions based on biplanar radiographs.

Authors:  Bachir Ghostine; Christophe Sauret; Ayman Assi; Ziad Bakouny; Nour Khalil; Wafa Skalli; Ismat Ghanem
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  A quasi-brittle continuum damage finite element model of the human proximal femur based on element deletion.

Authors:  Ridha Hambli
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Low-dose biplanar skeletal survey versus digital skeletal survey in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Nathalie Boutry; Bastien Dutouquet; Xavier Leleu; Marie-Hélène Vieillard; Alain Duhamel; Anne Cotten
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Idiopathic scoliosis in children and adolescents: assessment with a biplanar X-ray device.

Authors:  Elisa Amzallag-Bellenger; Fabian Uyttenhove; Eric Nectoux; Antoine Moraux; Julien Bigot; Bernard Herbaux; Nathalie Boutry
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2014-09-13

8.  EOS(®) biplanar X-ray imaging: concept, developments, benefits, and limitations.

Authors:  Elias Melhem; Ayman Assi; Rami El Rachkidi; Ismat Ghanem
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 1.548

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.