BACKGROUND: The number of in vivo clinical biomedical experiments based on computed tomography is increasing. International radiation-protection bodies are promoting the use of low-dose computed tomography to reduce radiation absorption by the subject undergoing imaging. On the other hand no data exist in the literature to quantify whether or not low-dose computed tomography would lead to a decrease of result quality when used for three-dimensional bone modeling and related measurements. METHODS: This paper aimed at finding a consensus between minimal X-ray radiation of the subject, and satisfactory image data quality, especially for accurate three-dimensional bone modeling. Several standard computed tomography and low-dose computed tomography sequences were analyzed in three tests and statistically compared. FINDINGS: Absence of significant difference between standard and low-dose computed sequences indicated that the low-dose setting would not produce less accurate three-dimensional models, while it decreased the effective X-ray dose up to 90% compared to standard settings. INTERPRETATION: Low-dose computed tomography seems suitable for accurate three-dimensional bone modeling, while the related effective X-ray radiation is low. Such setting is therefore advised for any in vivo medical imaging aiming to collect bone data.
BACKGROUND: The number of in vivo clinical biomedical experiments based on computed tomography is increasing. International radiation-protection bodies are promoting the use of low-dose computed tomography to reduce radiation absorption by the subject undergoing imaging. On the other hand no data exist in the literature to quantify whether or not low-dose computed tomography would lead to a decrease of result quality when used for three-dimensional bone modeling and related measurements. METHODS: This paper aimed at finding a consensus between minimal X-ray radiation of the subject, and satisfactory image data quality, especially for accurate three-dimensional bone modeling. Several standard computed tomography and low-dose computed tomography sequences were analyzed in three tests and statistically compared. FINDINGS: Absence of significant difference between standard and low-dose computed sequences indicated that the low-dose setting would not produce less accurate three-dimensional models, while it decreased the effective X-ray dose up to 90% compared to standard settings. INTERPRETATION: Low-dose computed tomography seems suitable for accurate three-dimensional bone modeling, while the related effective X-ray radiation is low. Such setting is therefore advised for any in vivo medical imaging aiming to collect bone data.
Authors: Mao Li; Karol Miller; Grand Roman Joldes; Barry Doyle; Revanth Reddy Garlapati; Ron Kikinis; Adam Wittek Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2015-01-30 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Henrik Olivecrona; Gerald Q Maguire; Marilyn E Noz; Michael P Zeleznik; Uldis Kesteris; Lars Weidenhielm Journal: J Orthop Surg Res Date: 2016-02-24 Impact factor: 2.359
Authors: Volker Otten; Gerald Q Maguire; Marilyn E Noz; Michael P Zeleznik; Kjell G Nilsson; Henrik Olivecrona Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2017-01-24 Impact factor: 3.411