Literature DB >> 18542990

Total laparoscopic gastric mobilization for esophagectomy.

Hiroyuki Kitagawa1, Toyokazu Akimori, Takehiro Okabayashi, Tsutomu Namikawa, Tekeki Sugimoto, Michiya Kobayashi, Kazuhiro Hanazaki.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The operative mortality and morbidity associated with esophageal surgery has been decreasing with advances in surgical techniques and equipment, however, postoperative complication remains a major cause of a potentially fatal outcome. We herein describe a new technique for esophagectomy by total laparoscopic gastric mobilization technique as a minimally invasive surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between April 2003 and August 2007, 36 patients who were suffering from esophageal cancer were surgically resected at Kochi Medical School. Operation-related parameters, mortality, postoperative complication, intubation time, and length of surgical intensive care unit in patients with total laparoscopic gastric mobilization for esophagectomy (the TLGM group, n = 16) were evaluated, compared to patients with ordinary thoraco-abdominal esophagectomy (the OPEN group, n = 20).
RESULTS: There was no mortality in the TLGM group and one hospital death in the OPEN group. Operation time of the OPEN group (506 +/- 64 min) was significant shorter than that of the TLGM group (558 +/- 67 min). The estimated intraoperative blood loss volume in patients of the TLGM group (496 +/- 259 mL) was much smaller than those of the OPEN group (1,067 +/- 566 mL). The intubation time and the intensive care unit stay in the TLGM group were much shorter than that in the OPEN group.
CONCLUSIONS: Esophagectomy with regional lymphadenectomy combined with total laparoscopic gastric mobilization is a safe and beneficial opportunity for patients who underwent surgical procedure for esophageal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18542990     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-008-0354-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  18 in total

1.  Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open fundoplication: blind evaluation of recovery and discharge period.

Authors:  G Nilsson; S Larsson; F Johnsson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Esophagogastrectomy without pyloroplasty.

Authors:  V Velanovich
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.429

3.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy: short- and long-term outcomes.

Authors:  S Leibman; B M Smithers; D C Gotley; I Martin; J Thomas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-12-28       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Duration of operation as a risk factor for surgical site infection: comparison of English and US data.

Authors:  G Leong; J Wilson; A Charlett
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  An audit of surgical outcomes of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Yih-Gang Goan; Huang-Chou Chang; Hon-Ki Hsu; Yi-Pin Chou
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 4.191

6.  Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A comparison of postoperative pulmonary function.

Authors:  R C Frazee; J W Roberts; G C Okeson; R E Symmonds; S K Snyder; J C Hendricks; R W Smith
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Analysis of reduced death and complication rates after esophageal resection.

Authors:  B P Whooley; S Law; S C Murthy; A Alexandrou; J Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Post-esophagectomy gastric outlet obstruction: role of pyloromyotomy and management with endoscopic pyloric dilatation.

Authors:  Michael Lanuti; Pierre E de Delva; Cameron D Wright; Henning A Gaissert; John C Wain; Dean M Donahue; James S Allan; Douglas J Mathisen
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2006-12-12       Impact factor: 4.191

9.  Direct observations of surgical wound infections at a comprehensive cancer center.

Authors:  G R Barber; J Miransky; A E Brown; D G Coit; F M Lewis; H T Thaler; T E Kiehn; D Armstrong
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1995-10

Review 10.  Reducing hospital morbidity and mortality following esophagectomy.

Authors:  B Zane Atkins; Ashish S Shah; Kelley A Hutcheson; Jennifer H Mangum; Theodore N Pappas; David H Harpole; Thomas A D'Amico
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open surgery: is there an advantage?

Authors:  Lesley Uttley; Fiona Campbell; Michael Rhodes; Anna Cantrell; Heather Stegenga; Myfanwy Lloyd-Jones
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Better postoperative oxygenation in thoracoscopic esophagectomy in prone positioning.

Authors:  Tomoaki Yatabe; Hiroyuki Kitagawa; Koichi Yamashita; Toyokazu Akimori; Kazuhiro Hanazaki; Masataka Yokoyama
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2010-06-05       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Effects of a preoperative immune-modulating diet in patients with esophageal cancer: a prospective parallel group randomized study.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kitagawa; Tsutomu Namikawa; Tomoaki Yatabe; Masaya Munekage; Fumiyasu Yamasaki; Michiya Kobayashi; Kazuhiro Hanazaki
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Comparison of the perioperative outcome of esophagectomy by thoracoscopy in the prone position with that of thoracotomy in the lateral decubitus position.

Authors:  Tomoaki Yatabe; Hiroyuki Kitagawa; Koichi Yamashita; Kazuhiro Hanazaki; Masataka Yokoyama
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Comparison between neck-first approach and thoracic approach during thoracoscopic esophagectomy.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kitagawa; Tsutomu Namikawa; Jun Iwabu; Kazune Fujisawa; Michiya Kobayashi; Kazuhiro Hanazaki
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Outcomes of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in prone position with laparoscopic gastric mobilization for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kitagawa; Tsutomu Namikawa; Masaya Munekage; Kazune Fujisawa; Eri Munekgae; Michiya Kobayashi; Kazuhiro Hanazaki
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Superiority of Minimally Invasive Oesophagectomy in Reducing In-Hospital Mortality of Patients with Resectable Oesophageal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Can Zhou; Li Zhang; Hua Wang; Xiaoxia Ma; Bohui Shi; Wuke Chen; Jianjun He; Ke Wang; Peijun Liu; Yu Ren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Changes in respiratory mechanics of artificial pneumothorax two-lung ventilation in video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy in prone position.

Authors:  Yoshinori Tanigawa; Kimihide Nakamura; Tomoko Yamashita; Akira Nakagawachi; Yoshiro Sakaguchi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Is minimally invasive esophagectomy effective for preventing anastomotic leakages after esophagectomy for cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Can Zhou; Gang Ma; Xiao Li; Juan Li; Yu Yan; Peijun Liu; Jianjun He; Yu Ren
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.754

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.