Literature DB >> 33772105

Changes in respiratory mechanics of artificial pneumothorax two-lung ventilation in video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy in prone position.

Yoshinori Tanigawa1, Kimihide Nakamura2, Tomoko Yamashita2, Akira Nakagawachi2, Yoshiro Sakaguchi3.   

Abstract

We aimed to clarify the changes in respiratory mechanics and factors associated with them in artificial pneumothorax two-lung ventilation in video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position (PP-VATS-E) for esophageal cancer. Data of patients with esophageal cancer, who underwent PP-VATs-E were retrospectively analyzed. Our primary outcome was the change in the respiratory mechanics after intubation (T1), in the prone position (T2), after initiation of the artificial pneumothorax two-lung ventilation (T3), at 1 and 2 h (T4 and T5), in the supine position (T6), and after laparoscopy (T7). The secondary outcome was identifying factors affecting the change in dynamic lung compliance (Cdyn). Sixty-seven patients were included. Cdyn values were significantly lower at T3, T4, and T5 than at T1 (p < 0.001). End-expiratory flow was significantly higher at T4 and T5 than at T1 (p < 0.05). Body mass index and preoperative FEV1.0% were found to significantly influence Cdyn reduction during artificial pneumothorax and two-lung ventilation (OR [95% CI]: 1.29 [1.03-2.24] and 0.20 (0.05-0.44); p = 0.010 and p = 0.034, respectively]. Changes in driving pressure were nonsignificant, and hypoxemia requiring treatment was not noted. This study suggests that in PP-VATs-E, artificial pneumothorax two-lung ventilation is safer for the management of anesthesia than conventional one-lung ventilation (UMIN Registry: 000042174).

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33772105      PMCID: PMC7998006          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-86554-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  29 in total

1.  Pulmonary perfusion is more uniform in the prone than in the supine position: scintigraphy in healthy humans.

Authors:  S Nyrén; M Mure; H Jacobsson; S A Larsson; S G Lindahl
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1999-04

2.  Thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization during minimally invasive esophagectomy: a head-to-head comparison of prone versus decubitus positions.

Authors:  Thomas Fabian; Jeremiah Martin; Mario Katigbak; Alicia A McKelvey; John A Federico
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Lung ventilation and perfusion in prone and supine postures with reference to anesthetized and mechanically ventilated healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Sven Nyrén; Peter Radell; Sten G E Lindahl; Margareta Mure; Johan Petersson; Stig A Larsson; Hans Jacobsson; Alejandro Sánchez-Crespo
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world.

Authors:  Farin Kamangar; Graça M Dores; William F Anderson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-05-10       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Better postoperative oxygenation in thoracoscopic esophagectomy in prone positioning.

Authors:  Tomoaki Yatabe; Hiroyuki Kitagawa; Koichi Yamashita; Toyokazu Akimori; Kazuhiro Hanazaki; Masataka Yokoyama
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2010-06-05       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  An expanded definition of the adult respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  J F Murray; M A Matthay; J M Luce; M R Flick
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1988-09

7.  Thoracoscopic subtotal oesophagectomy.

Authors:  A Cuschieri
Journal:  Endosc Surg Allied Technol       Date:  1994-02

8.  Comparison of ventilation and cardiovascular parameters between prone thoracoscopic and Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.

Authors:  Luigi Bonavina; Letizia Laface; Emmanuele Abate; Michele Punturieri; Emiliano Agosteo; Marco Nencioni
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2012-04-19

9.  Lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve by a minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position for thoracic esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Hirokazu Noshiro; Hironori Iwasaki; Kiitiro Kobayashi; Akihiko Uchiyama; Yoshihiro Miyasaka; Toshihiro Masatsugu; Kenta Koike; Kouji Miyazaki
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-05-22       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Low invasiveness of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches between thoracoscopic and open esophagectomy.

Authors:  Shinsuke Kanekiyo; Shigeru Takeda; Masahito Tsutsui; Mitsuo Nishiyama; Masahiro Kitahara; Yoshitaro Shindo; Yukio Tokumitsu; Shinobu Tomochika; Yoshihiro Tokuhisa; Michihisa Iida; Kazuhiko Sakamoto; Nobuaki Suzuki; Shigeru Yamamoto; Shigefumi Yoshino; Shoichi Hazama; Tomio Ueno; Hiroaki Nagano
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of complications and long-term survival after minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Yu Rong; Yanbing Hao; Jun Xue; Xiaoyuan Li; Qian Li; Li Wang; Tian Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 5.738

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.