Literature DB >> 20526722

Better postoperative oxygenation in thoracoscopic esophagectomy in prone positioning.

Tomoaki Yatabe1, Hiroyuki Kitagawa, Koichi Yamashita, Toyokazu Akimori, Kazuhiro Hanazaki, Masataka Yokoyama.   

Abstract

Intrathoracic procedures can be performed with thoracoscopy in esophagectomy because the laparoscopic technique has recently been developed. During intrathoracic procedures, prone positioning of the patient allows gravity to facilitate optimal exposure of the esophagus, thereby affording a superb surgical view. In the current study, we compared the influence of prone positioning with lateral decubitus positioning on oxygenation in esophagectomy. We enrolled 18 patients and divided them into two groups: patients who underwent esophagectomy via thoracoscopy in the prone position (group P) and patients who underwent thoracotomy in the lateral decubitus position (control group, group L). Arterial blood gas analyses were performed before the operation was started (T1), 20 min after the initiation of one-lung ventilation (OLV) (T2), and two other points. The P/F ratio at T2 in group P was higher. Further, percent (%) change of the P/F ratios from T1 and thereafter in group P was higher at all points. We thought the reason why the prone position had contributed to maintenance oxygenation was as follows. First, the functional residual capacity and ventilation/perfusion matching in the prone position are satisfactory. Second, a bronchial blocker might contribute to reduction of atelectasis. Third, minimally invasive esophagectomy might reduce respiratory complications and blood loss because this procedure reduces edema and inflammation in the lung. In conclusion, the oxygenation provided by prone positioning is better than that provided by the lateral decubitus position during OLV in esophagectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20526722     DOI: 10.1007/s00540-010-0968-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anesth        ISSN: 0913-8668            Impact factor:   2.078


  9 in total

Review 1.  Ventilator-associated pneumonia or endotracheal tube-associated pneumonia? An approach to the pathogenesis and preventive strategies emphasizing the importance of endotracheal tube.

Authors:  Ioannis A Pneumatikos; Christos K Dragoumanis; Demosthenes E Bouros
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Pressure-controlled versus volume-controlled ventilation during one-lung ventilation in the prone position for robot-assisted esophagectomy.

Authors:  Yong Seon Choi; Jae Kwang Shim; Sungwon Na; Seung Bum Hong; Yong Woo Hong; Young Jun Oh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Open or minimally invasive esophagectomy: are the outcomes different?

Authors:  Jean S Bussières
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.706

4.  Effects of anesthesia and paralysis on diaphragmatic mechanics in man.

Authors:  A B Froese; A C Bryan
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Analysis of reduced death and complication rates after esophageal resection.

Authors:  B P Whooley; S Law; S C Murthy; A Alexandrou; J Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: feasibility and safety of robotic assistance in the prone position.

Authors:  Dae Joon Kim; Woo Jin Hyung; Chang Young Lee; Jin-Gu Lee; Seok Jin Haam; In-Kyu Park; Kyung Young Chung
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: laparoscopic transhiatal procedure or thoracoscopy in prone position followed by laparoscopy?

Authors:  G Dapri; J Himpens; G B Cadière
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Reducing hospital morbidity and mortality following esophagectomy.

Authors:  B Zane Atkins; Ashish S Shah; Kelley A Hutcheson; Jennifer H Mangum; Theodore N Pappas; David H Harpole; Thomas A D'Amico
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Total laparoscopic gastric mobilization for esophagectomy.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kitagawa; Toyokazu Akimori; Takehiro Okabayashi; Tsutomu Namikawa; Tekeki Sugimoto; Michiya Kobayashi; Kazuhiro Hanazaki
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 3.445

  9 in total
  15 in total

Review 1.  Thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position.

Authors:  Omar A Jarral; Sanjay Purkayastha; Thanos Athanasiou; Ara Darzi; George B Hanna; Emmanouil Zacharakis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Advantages of the prone position for minimally invasive esophagectomy in comparison to the left decubitus position: better oxygenation after minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Eiji Tanaka; Hiroshi Okabe; Yousuke Kinjo; Shigeru Tsunoda; Kazutaka Obama; Shigeo Hisamori; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Prone position in thoracoscopic esophagectomy improves postoperative oxygenation and reduces pulmonary complications.

Authors:  Dai Otsubo; Tetsu Nakamura; Masashi Yamamoto; Shingo Kanaji; Kiyonori Kanemitsu; Kimihiro Yamashita; Tatsuya Imanishi; Taro Oshikiri; Yasuo Sumi; Satoshi Suzuki; Daisuke Kuroda; Yoshihiro Kakeji
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Predictive factors for post-operative respiratory infections after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: outcome of randomized trial.

Authors:  Surya Say Biere; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Luigi Bonavina; Camiel Rosman; Josep Roig Garcia; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Donald L van der Peet; Miguel A Cuesta
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Thoracoscopic enucleation of esophageal leiomyoma in prone position and single lumen endotracheal intubation.

Authors:  C M P Claus; A M Cury Filho; P C Boscardim; P C Andriguetto; M P Loureiro; E A Bonin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Comparison of short-term outcomes between prone and lateral decubitus positions for thoracoscopic esophagectomy.

Authors:  Jin Teshima; Go Miyata; Takashi Kamei; Toru Nakano; Shigeo Abe; Kazunori Katsura; Yusuke Taniyama; Tadashi Sakurai; Makoto Hikage; Takanobu Nakamura; Kai Takaya; Masashi Zuguchi; Hiroshi Okamoto; Ozawa Youhei; Noriaki Ohuchi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Comparison of the perioperative outcome of esophagectomy by thoracoscopy in the prone position with that of thoracotomy in the lateral decubitus position.

Authors:  Tomoaki Yatabe; Hiroyuki Kitagawa; Koichi Yamashita; Kazuhiro Hanazaki; Masataka Yokoyama
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  Comparison between neck-first approach and thoracic approach during thoracoscopic esophagectomy.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kitagawa; Tsutomu Namikawa; Jun Iwabu; Kazune Fujisawa; Michiya Kobayashi; Kazuhiro Hanazaki
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  [Abdominothoracic esophageal resection according to Ivor Lewis with intrathoracic anastomosis : standardized totally minimally invasive technique].

Authors:  N Runkel; M Walz; M Ketelhut
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 0.955

10.  Intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis using a linear stapler following minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position.

Authors:  Hiroshi Okabe; Eiji Tanaka; Shigeru Tsunoda; Kazutaka Obama; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.