OBJECTIVE: Cardiac rehabilitation remains grossly under-utilized despite its proven benefits. This study prospectively compared verified cardiac rehabilitation enrollment following automatic vs usual referral, postulating that automatic referral would result in significantly greater enrollment for cardiac rehabilitation. DESIGN: Prospective controlled multi-center study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A consecutive sample of 661 patients with acute coronary syndrome treated at 2 acute care centers (75% response rate) were recruited, one site with automatic referral via a computerized prompt and the other with a usual referral strategy at the physician's discretion. Cardiac rehabilitation referral was discerned in a mailed survey 9 months later (n = 506; 84% retention), and verified with 24 cardiac rehabilitation sites to which participants were referred. RESULTS: A total of 124 (52%) participants enrolled in cardiac rehabilitation following automatic referral, vs 84 (32%) following usual referral (p < 0.001). Automatically referred participants were more likely to be referred from an in- patient unit (p < 0.01), and to be referred in a shorter time period (p < 0.001). Logistic regression analyses revealed that, after controlling for sociodemographic characteristics and case-mix, automatically referred participants were significantly more likely to enroll in cardiac rehabilitation (odds ratio = 2.1; 95% confidence interval 1.4-3.3) than controls. CONCLUSION: Automatic referral resulted in over 50% verified cardiac rehabilitation enrollment; 2 times more than usual referral. It also significantly reduced utilization delays to less than one month.
OBJECTIVE: Cardiac rehabilitation remains grossly under-utilized despite its proven benefits. This study prospectively compared verified cardiac rehabilitation enrollment following automatic vs usual referral, postulating that automatic referral would result in significantly greater enrollment for cardiac rehabilitation. DESIGN: Prospective controlled multi-center study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A consecutive sample of 661 patients with acute coronary syndrome treated at 2 acute care centers (75% response rate) were recruited, one site with automatic referral via a computerized prompt and the other with a usual referral strategy at the physician's discretion. Cardiac rehabilitation referral was discerned in a mailed survey 9 months later (n = 506; 84% retention), and verified with 24 cardiac rehabilitation sites to which participants were referred. RESULTS: A total of 124 (52%) participants enrolled in cardiac rehabilitation following automatic referral, vs 84 (32%) following usual referral (p < 0.001). Automatically referred participants were more likely to be referred from an in- patient unit (p < 0.01), and to be referred in a shorter time period (p < 0.001). Logistic regression analyses revealed that, after controlling for sociodemographic characteristics and case-mix, automatically referred participants were significantly more likely to enroll in cardiac rehabilitation (odds ratio = 2.1; 95% confidence interval 1.4-3.3) than controls. CONCLUSION: Automatic referral resulted in over 50% verified cardiac rehabilitation enrollment; 2 times more than usual referral. It also significantly reduced utilization delays to less than one month.
Authors: Sherry L Grace; Suzan Krepostman; Dina Brooks; Susan Jaglal; Beth L Abramson; Pat Scholey; Neville Suskin; Heather Arthur; Donna E Stewart Journal: J Eval Clin Pract Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 2.431
Authors: V Salomaa; M Niemelä; H Miettinen; M Ketonen; P Immonen-Räihä; S Koskinen; M Mähönen; S Lehto; T Vuorenmaa; P Palomäki; H Mustaniemi; E Kaarsalo; M Arstila; J Torppa; K Kuulasmaa; P Puska; K Pyörälä; J Tuomilehto Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-04-25 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Frans Van de Werf; Joel M Gore; Alvaro Avezum; Dietrich C Gulba; Shaun G Goodman; Andrzej Budaj; David Brieger; Kami White; Keith A A Fox; Kim A Eagle; Brian M Kennelly Journal: BMJ Date: 2005-01-21
Authors: Keerat Grewal; Yvonne W Leung; Parissa Safai; Donna E Stewart; Sonia Anand; Milan Gupta; Cynthia Parsons; Sherry L Grace Journal: Rehabil Nurs Date: 2010 May-Jun Impact factor: 1.625
Authors: Shannon Gravely-Witte; Yvonne W Leung; Rajiv Nariani; Hala Tamim; Paul Oh; Victoria M Chan; Sherry L Grace Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2009-12-08 Impact factor: 32.419
Authors: Patrick D Savage; Bonnie K Sanderson; Todd M Brown; Kathy Berra; Philip A Ades Journal: J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev Date: 2011 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.081
Authors: Marta Supervía; Jose R Medina-Inojosa; Colin Yeung; Francisco Lopez-Jimenez; Ray W Squires; Carmen M Pérez-Terzic; LaPrincess C Brewer; Shawn E Leth; Randal J Thomas Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2017-03-13 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Sherry L Grace; Yvonne W Leung; Robert Reid; Paul Oh; Gilbert Wu; David A Alter Journal: J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev Date: 2012 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.081
Authors: Sherry L Grace; Shannon Gravely-Witte; Sheena Kayaniyil; Janette Brual; Neville Suskin; Donna E Stewart Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Todd M Brown; Adrian F Hernandez; Vera Bittner; Christopher P Cannon; Gray Ellrodt; Li Liang; Eric D Peterson; Ileana L Piña; Monika M Safford; Gregg C Fonarow Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-08-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Sherry L Grace; Shannon Gravely-Witte; Janette Brual; Neville Suskin; Lyall Higginson; David Alter; Donna E Stewart Journal: Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med Date: 2008-06-10