Literature DB >> 18538756

Attentional SNARC: there's something special about numbers (let us count the ways).

Michael D Dodd1, Stefan Van der Stigchel, M Adil Leghari, Gery Fung, Alan Kingstone.   

Abstract

We report a study that examines whether the presentation of irrelevant, ordinal information at central fixation interacts with the allocation of attention beyond fixation. Previous research has demonstrated that number perception influences the allocation of spatial attention, such that the presentation of a spatially nonpredictive number at fixation results in attention being allocated to the left when the central number is low (e.g., 1), and attention being allocated to the right when the central number is high (e.g., 9). Here, we examine whether this attentional SNARC effect (spatial numerical association of response codes) generalizes to other ordinal sequences: letters, days, and months. Though we replicate the attentional SNARC we find that this effect is number-specific, unless participants are required to process the cue in an order-relevant fashion. This discovery of number-specificity has important implications both for the functional separation between SNARC and attention-SNARC effects, as well as lending support to recent theories regarding the specificity of a shared neural architecture between numbers and visuospatial attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18538756     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  30 in total

1.  Numbers can move our hands: a spatial representation effect in digits handwriting.

Authors:  Gelsomina Perrone; Maria Dolores de Hevia; Emanuela Bricolo; Luisa Girelli
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Negative numbers eliminate, but do not reverse, the attentional SNARC effect.

Authors:  Michael D Dodd
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-04-10

3.  Voluntary eye movements direct attention on the mental number space.

Authors:  Mariagrazia Ranzini; Matteo Lisi; Marco Zorzi
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-02-02

4.  Placing order in space: the SNARC effect in serial learning.

Authors:  Paola Previtali; Maria Dolores de Hevia; Luisa Girelli
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The effect of working memory load on the SNARC effect: Maybe tasks have a word to say.

Authors:  Zhijun Deng; Yinghe Chen; Xiaoshuang Zhu; Yanjun Li
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-04

Review 6.  Mapping of non-numerical domains on space: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anne Macnamara; Hannah A D Keage; Tobias Loetscher
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  On the genesis of spatial-numerical associations: Evolutionary and cultural factors co-construct the mental number line.

Authors:  Elizabeth Y Toomarian; Edward M Hubbard
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Pseudoneglect for mental alphabet lines is affected by prismatic adaptation.

Authors:  Michael E R Nicholls; Adrian Kamer; Andrea M Loftus
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Implied Spatial Meaning and Visuospatial Bias: Conceptual Processing Influences Processing of Visual Targets and Distractors.

Authors:  Davood G Gozli; Jay Pratt; K Zoë Martin; Alison L Chasteen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  The spatial representation of numbers: evidence from neglect and pseudoneglect.

Authors:  Carlo Umiltà; Konstantinos Priftis; Marco Zorzi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.