Literature DB >> 29279982

Mapping of non-numerical domains on space: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Anne Macnamara1, Hannah A D Keage2, Tobias Loetscher2.   

Abstract

The spatial numerical association of response code (SNARC) effect is characterized by low numbers mapped to the left side of space and high numbers mapped to the right side of space. In addition to numbers, SNARC-like effects have been found in non-numerical magnitude domains such as time, size, letters, luminance, and more, whereby the smaller/earlier and larger/later magnitudes are typically mapped to the left and right of space, respectively. The purpose of this systematic and meta-analytic review was to identify and summarise all empirical papers that have investigated horizontal (left-right) SNARC-like mappings using non-numerical stimuli. A systematic search was conducted using EMBASE, Medline, and PsycINFO, where 2216 publications were identified, with 57 papers meeting the inclusion criteria (representing 112 experiments). Ninety-five of these experiments were included in a meta-analysis, resulting in an overall effect size of d = .488 for a SNARC-like effect. Additional analyses revealed a significant effect size advantage for explicit instruction tasks compared with implicit instructions, yet yielded no difference for the role of expertise on SNARC-like effects. There was clear evidence for a publication bias in the field, but the impact of this bias is likely to be modest, and it is unlikely that the SNARC-like effect is a pure artefact of this bias. The similarities in the response properties for the spatial mappings of numerical and non-numerical domains support the concept of a general higher order magnitude system. Yet, further research will need to be conducted to identify all the factors modulating the strength of the spatial associations.

Keywords:  Magnitudes; SARC; SNARC; Spatial numerical association of response codes

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29279982     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-5154-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  58 in total

1.  Is the future the right time?

Authors:  Marc Ouellet; Julio Santiago; Ziv Israeli; Shai Gabay
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2010

2.  Effects of laterality and pitch height of an auditory accessory stimulus on horizontal response selection: the Simon effect and the SMARC effect.

Authors:  Akio Nishimura; Kazuhiko Yokosawa
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-08

3.  Flexible conceptual projection of time onto spatial frames of reference.

Authors:  Ana Torralbo; Julio Santiago; Juan Lupiáñez
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-07-08

4.  Non-musicians also have a piano in the head: evidence for spatial-musical associations from line bisection tracking.

Authors:  Matthias Hartmann
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2016-09-30

5.  Priming the mental time-line: effects of modality and processing mode.

Authors:  Bettina Rolke; Susana Ruiz Fernández; Mareike Schmid; Matthias Walker; Martin Lachmair; Juan José Rahona López; Gonzalo Hervás; Carmelo Vázquez
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2013-01-24

Review 6.  Beyond the number domain.

Authors:  Jessica F Cantlon; Michael L Platt; Elizabeth M Brannon
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  The cognitive mechanisms of the SNARC effect: an individual differences approach.

Authors:  Arnaud Viarouge; Edward M Hubbard; Bruce D McCandliss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The effect of musical expertise on the representation of space.

Authors:  Carlotta Lega; Zaira Cattaneo; Lotfi B Merabet; Tomaso Vecchi; Silvia Cucchi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Professional mathematicians differ from controls in their spatial-numerical associations.

Authors:  Krzysztof Cipora; Mateusz Hohol; Hans-Christoph Nuerk; Klaus Willmes; Bartosz Brożek; Bartłomiej Kucharzyk; Edward Nęcka
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-06-11

10.  Are numbers, size and brightness equally efficient in orienting visual attention? Evidence from an eye-tracking study.

Authors:  Hermann Bulf; Viola Macchi Cassia; Maria Dolores de Hevia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  16 in total

1.  Time dependency of the SNARC effect for different number formats: evidence from saccadic responses.

Authors:  Alexandra Pressigout; Agnès Charvillat; Karima Mersad; Karine Doré-Mazars
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-04-09

2.  Emotional SNARC: emotional faces affect the impact of number magnitude on gaze patterns.

Authors:  Ivan Blanco; Ines Nieto; Carmelo Vazquez
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-06-22

3.  When time stands upright: STEARC effects along the vertical axis.

Authors:  Mario Dalmaso; Youval Schnapper; Michele Vicovaro
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-06-19

4.  Time reproduction, bisection and doubling: a novel paradigm to investigate the effect of the internal clock on time estimation.

Authors:  Davide Momi; Giulia Prete; Adolfo Di Crosta; Pasquale La Malva; Rocco Palumbo; Irene Ceccato; Emanuela Bartolini; Riccardo Palumbo; Nicola Mammarella; Mirco Fasolo; Alberto Di Domenico
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-10-01

5.  Is 'heavy' up or down? Testing the vertical spatial representation of weight.

Authors:  Michele Vicovaro; Mario Dalmaso
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-03-13

6.  The effects of risk magnitude training on mapping risks on space.

Authors:  Erica S Ghezzi; Tobias Loetscher; Anne Macnamara; Hannah A D Keage
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Does Number Perception Cause Automatic Shifts of Spatial Attention? A Study of the Att-SNARC Effect in Numbers and Chinese Months.

Authors:  Dexian He; Xianyou He; Tingting Zhao; Jing Wang; Longzhao Li; Max Louwerse
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-05-12

8.  Compatibility between object size and response side in grasping: the left hand prefers smaller objects, the right hand prefers larger objects.

Authors:  Christian Seegelke; Peter Wühr
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Nature and nurture effects on the spatiality of the mental time line.

Authors:  Filomena Anelli; Gregory Peters-Founshtein; Yaen Shreibman; Elior Moreh; Chiara Forlani; Francesca Frassinetti; Shahar Arzy
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  There's a SNARC in the Size Congruity Task.

Authors:  Tina Weis; Steffen Theobald; Andreas Schmitt; Cees van Leeuwen; Thomas Lachmann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-10-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.