Literature DB >> 18537993

Hypersensitivity reactions associated with endovascular devices.

Golara Honari1, Stephen G Ellis, Bruce L Wilkoff, Mark A Aronica, Lars G Svensson, James S Taylor.   

Abstract

Allergic reactions to endoprostheses are uncommon and reported in association with orthopaedic, dental, endovascular and other implanted devices. Hypersensitivity reactions to the biomaterials used in endovascular prostheses are among the infrequent reactions that may lead to local or systemic complications following cardiovascular therapeutic interventions. This article reviews potential immunotoxic effects of commonly used biomaterials. Reports of putative hypersensitivity reactions to endovascular devices, including coronary stents, perforated foramen occluders, pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators are also reviewed.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2008        PMID： 18537993     DOI： 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2008.01351.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contact Dermatitis        ISSN： 0105-1873            Impact factor:   6.600


  17 in total

Review 1.  Systemic contact dermatitis and allergy to biomedical devices.

Authors:  Marcella Aquino; Tania Mucci
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.806

2.  Frequency of Contact Allergy to Implanted Cardiac Devices.

Authors:  Matthew Gold; Neel Nath; Cynthia Green; Amber Reck Atwater
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 10.282

Review 3.  [Hypersensitivity reactions to implantable cardiac pacemakers and defibrillators].

Authors:  B Kreft
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 0.751

4.  Current practices in corrosion, surface characterization, and nickel leach testing of cardiovascular metallic implants.

Authors:  Srinidhi Nagaraja; Matthew Di Prima; David Saylor; Erica Takai
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 3.368

5.  Dermatitis caused by metal allergy after coil embolization for unruptured cerebral aneurysm.

Authors:  Takeshi Uwatoko; Tomoyuki Tsumoto; Naoko Wada; Kazunori Urabe; Yoshiki Sanbongi; Sou Tokunaga; Yuichirou Tsurusaki; Yasushi Okada
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-11-03

Review 6.  Non-ischemic cerebral enhancing lesions secondary to endovascular aneurysm therapy: nickel allergy or foreign body reaction? Case series and review of the literature.

Authors:  Eimad Shotar; Bruno Law-Ye; Flore Baronnet-Chauvet; Sinead Zeidan; Dimitri Psimaras; Franck Bielle; Catherine Pecquet; Soledad Navarro; Charlotte Rosso; Fleur Cohen; Jacques Chiras; Federico Di Maria; Nader Sourour; Frédéric Clarençon
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 7.  Systemic Contact Dermatitis: The Routes of Allergen Entry.

Authors:  Zhouxian Pan; Yongshi Yang; Lishan Zhang; Rui Tang; Christopher Chang; Jinlyu Sun; Xianjie Zhou; Yueping Zeng; Jing Zhang
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 8.667

8.  Relation of Nickel Allergy with in-Stent Restenosis in Patients Treated with Cobalt Chromium Stents.

Authors:  Cihangir Aliağaoğlu; Hakan Turan; Ismail Erden; Hülya Albayrak; Hakan Ozhan; Cengiz Başar; Zehra Gürlevik; Ayşegül Alçelik
Journal:  Ann Dermatol       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 1.444

9.  A Rare Case of Recurrent Pacemaker Allergic Reaction.

Authors:  Muhammed Shittu; Pooja Shah; Walid Elkhalili; Addi Suleiman; Hamid Shaaban; Pradip A Shah; Fayez Shamoon
Journal:  Heart Views       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

10.  Detailed analysis of allergic cutaneous reactions to spinal cord stimulator devices.

Authors:  Zeshan Ahmed Chaudhry; Umer Najib; Zahid H Bajwa; W Carl Jacobs; Javed Sheikh; Thomas T Simopoulos
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.133
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.