Literature DB >> 18536878

Algorithms, nomograms and the detection of indolent prostate cancer.

Monique J Roobol1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in men. However, only about 12% of the men diagnosed with prostate cancer will die of their disease. RESULT: The serum PSA test can detect prostate cancers early, but using a PSA based cut-off indication for prostate biopsy results in unnecessary testing in app. 75-80% of the men and perhaps even more important the serum PSA test cannot tell how aggressive the cancer is. To decrease unnecessary testing different test results are often combined, converted into a probability and displayed graphically. There are more than 40 of these so called nomograms in the case of prostate cancer. These nomograms can be divided into two categories, namely those that predict biopsy outcome using results from serum determination(s) or non-invasive tests such as the DRE and TRUS. The second category represents those nomograms that predict tumor characteristics and prognosis using information coming from pathology review.
CONCLUSION: The ultimate nomogram able to predict tumor characteristics and progression purely based on non-invasive testing will for a large part put an end to the negative side effects and uncertainties that coincide with the early detection of prostate cancer, if it will ever be made.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18536878     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-008-0278-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  63 in total

1.  Should routine screening for prostate-specific antigen be recommended?

Authors:  Siam Oottamasathien; E David Crawford
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003-03-24

2.  A preoperative nomogram for disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  M W Kattan; J A Eastham; A M Stapleton; T M Wheeler; P T Scardino
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1998-05-20       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) best practice policy. American Urological Association (AUA).

Authors: 
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.990

4.  Screening for prostate cancer with the prostate-specific antigen test: are patients making informed decisions?

Authors:  K J O'Dell; R J Volk; A R Cass; S J Spann
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 0.493

5.  Prostate cancer screening strategies with re-screening interval determined by individual baseline prostate-specific antigen values are cost-effective.

Authors:  T Kobayashi; R Goto; K Ito; K Mitsumori
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 4.424

6.  Prostate-specific antigen levels in the United States: implications of various definitions for abnormal.

Authors:  H Gilbert Welch; Lisa M Schwartz; Steven Woloshin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 7.  Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: selection of patients and predictors of progression.

Authors:  Marc A Dall'Era; Badrinath R Konety
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Urol       Date:  2008-02-19

8.  Nomogram use for the prediction of indolent prostate cancer: impact on screen-detected populations.

Authors:  Stijn Roemeling; Monique J Roobol; Michael W Kattan; Theo H van der Kwast; Ewout W Steyerberg; Fritz H Schröder
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 9.  Active surveillance for favorable risk prostate cancer: rationale, risks, and results.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.498

10.  Are physicians discussing prostate cancer screening with their patients and why or why not? A pilot study.

Authors:  Carmen E Guerra; Samantha E Jacobs; John H Holmes; Judy A Shea
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.