Literature DB >> 18536015

Guiding conformation space search with an all-atom energy potential.

T J Brunette1, Oliver Brock.   

Abstract

The most significant impediment for protein structure prediction is the inadequacy of conformation space search. Conformation space is too large and the energy landscape too rugged for existing search methods to consistently find near-optimal minima. To alleviate this problem, we present model-based search, a novel conformation space search method. Model-based search uses highly accurate information obtained during search to build an approximate, partial model of the energy landscape. Model-based search aggregates information in the model as it progresses, and in turn uses this information to guide exploration toward regions most likely to contain a near-optimal minimum. We validate our method by predicting the structure of 32 proteins, ranging in length from 49 to 213 amino acids. Our results demonstrate that model-based search is more effective at finding low-energy conformations in high-dimensional conformation spaces than existing search methods. The reduction in energy translates into structure predictions of increased accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18536015      PMCID: PMC2752431          DOI: 10.1002/prot.22123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  23 in total

1.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP): round III.

Authors:  J Moult; T Hubbard; K Fidelis; J T Pedersen
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999

2.  Global optimization by energy landscape paving.

Authors:  Ulrich H E Hansmann; Luc T Wille
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2002-01-28       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Local energy landscape flattening: parallel hyperbolic Monte Carlo sampling of protein folding.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Daisuke Kihara; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2002-08-01

4.  De novo prediction of three-dimensional structures for major protein families.

Authors:  Richard Bonneau; Charlie E M Strauss; Carol A Rohl; Dylan Chivian; Phillip Bradley; Lars Malmström; Tim Robertson; David Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-09-06       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Replica Monte Carlo simulation of spin glasses.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1986-11-24       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  Prediction of CASP6 structures using automated Robetta protocols.

Authors:  Dylan Chivian; David E Kim; Lars Malmström; Jack Schonbrun; Carol A Rohl; David Baker
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2005

7.  TASSER: an automated method for the prediction of protein tertiary structures in CASP6.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Adrian K Arakaki; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2005

8.  Toward high-resolution de novo structure prediction for small proteins.

Authors:  Philip Bradley; Kira M S Misura; David Baker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  The Monte Carlo method.

Authors:  N METROPOLIS; S ULAM
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  1949-09       Impact factor: 5.033

10.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features.

Authors:  W Kabsch; C Sander
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 2.505

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Principles and Overview of Sampling Methods for Modeling Macromolecular Structure and Dynamics.

Authors:  Tatiana Maximova; Ryan Moffatt; Buyong Ma; Ruth Nussinov; Amarda Shehu
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 2.  Chemical shift-based methods in NMR structure determination.

Authors:  Santrupti Nerli; Andrew C McShan; Nikolaos G Sgourakis
Journal:  Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc       Date:  2018-03-11       Impact factor: 9.795

3.  OPTIMIZATION BIAS IN ENERGY-BASED STRUCTURE PREDICTION.

Authors:  Robert J Petrella
Journal:  J Theor Comput Chem       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 0.939

4.  NMR structure determination for larger proteins using backbone-only data.

Authors:  Srivatsan Raman; Oliver F Lange; Paolo Rossi; Michael Tyka; Xu Wang; James Aramini; Gaohua Liu; Theresa A Ramelot; Alexander Eletsky; Thomas Szyperski; Michael A Kennedy; James Prestegard; Gaetano T Montelione; David Baker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Analysis of free modeling predictions by RBO aleph in CASP11.

Authors:  Mahmoud Mabrouk; Tim Werner; Michael Schneider; Ines Putz; Oliver Brock
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2015-11-26

6.  The dual role of fragments in fragment-assembly methods for de novo protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Julia Handl; Joshua Knowles; Robert Vernon; David Baker; Simon C Lovell
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-11-17

7.  Trends in template/fragment-free protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Yaoqi Zhou; Yong Duan; Yuedong Yang; Eshel Faraggi; Hongxing Lei
Journal:  Theor Chem Acc       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 1.702

8.  Resolution-adapted recombination of structural features significantly improves sampling in restraint-guided structure calculation.

Authors:  Oliver F Lange; David Baker
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2012-03

9.  Evolutionary-inspired probabilistic search for enhancing sampling of local minima in the protein energy surface.

Authors:  Brian S Olson; Amarda Shehu
Journal:  Proteome Sci       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 2.480

10.  RBO Aleph: leveraging novel information sources for protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Mahmoud Mabrouk; Ines Putz; Tim Werner; Michael Schneider; Moritz Neeb; Philipp Bartels; Oliver Brock
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.