Literature DB >> 18534968

Accurate inclusion mass screening: a bridge from unbiased discovery to targeted assay development for biomarker verification.

Jacob D Jaffe1, Hasmik Keshishian, Betty Chang, Theresa A Addona, Michael A Gillette, Steven A Carr.   

Abstract

Verification of candidate biomarker proteins in blood is typically done using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) of peptides by LC-MS/MS on triple quadrupole MS systems. MRM assay development for each protein requires significant time and cost, much of which is likely to be of little value if the candidate biomarker is below the detection limit in blood or a false positive in the original discovery data. Here we present a new technology, accurate inclusion mass screening (AIMS), designed to provide a bridge from unbiased discovery to MS-based targeted assay development. Masses on the software inclusion list are monitored in each scan on the Orbitrap MS system, and MS/MS spectra for sequence confirmation are acquired only when a peptide from the list is detected with both the correct accurate mass and charge state. The AIMS experiment confirms that a given peptide (and thus the protein from which it is derived) is present in the plasma. Throughput of the method is sufficient to qualify up to a hundred proteins/week. The sensitivity of AIMS is similar to MRM on a triple quadrupole MS system using optimized sample preparation methods (low tens of ng/ml in plasma), and MS/MS data from the AIMS experiments on the Orbitrap can be directly used to configure MRM assays. The method was shown to be at least 4-fold more efficient at detecting peptides of interest than undirected LC-MS/MS experiments using the same instrumentation, and relative quantitation information can be obtained by AIMS in case versus control experiments. Detection by AIMS ensures that a quantitative MRM-based assay can be configured for that protein. The method has the potential to qualify large number of biomarker candidates based on their detection in plasma prior to committing to the time- and resource-intensive steps of establishing a quantitative assay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18534968      PMCID: PMC2559937          DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M800218-MCP200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics        ISSN: 1535-9476            Impact factor:   5.911


  16 in total

Review 1.  The case for early detection.

Authors:  Ruth Etzioni; Nicole Urban; Scott Ramsey; Martin McIntosh; Stephen Schwartz; Brian Reid; Jerald Radich; Garnet Anderson; Leland Hartwell
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  The interface between biomarker discovery and clinical validation: The tar pit of the protein biomarker pipeline.

Authors:  Amanda G Paulovich; Jeffrey R Whiteaker; Andrew N Hoofnagle; Pei Wang
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Multiple reaction monitoring to identify sites of protein phosphorylation with high sensitivity.

Authors:  Richard D Unwin; John R Griffiths; Michael K Leverentz; Agnes Grallert; Iain M Hagan; Anthony D Whetton
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2005-05-27       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 4.  The US Food and Drug Administration perspective on cancer biomarker development.

Authors:  Steven Gutman; Larry G Kessler
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 5.  Protein biomarker discovery and validation: the long and uncertain path to clinical utility.

Authors:  Nader Rifai; Michael A Gillette; Steven A Carr
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  Systematic identification of human mitochondrial disease genes through integrative genomics.

Authors:  Sarah Calvo; Mohit Jain; Xiaohui Xie; Sunil A Sheth; Betty Chang; Olga A Goldberger; Antonella Spinazzola; Massimo Zeviani; Steven A Carr; Vamsi K Mootha
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-04-02       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Antibody-based enrichment of peptides on magnetic beads for mass-spectrometry-based quantification of serum biomarkers.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Whiteaker; Lei Zhao; Heidi Y Zhang; Li-Chia Feng; Brian D Piening; Leigh Anderson; Amanda G Paulovich
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 3.365

8.  Integrated pipeline for mass spectrometry-based discovery and confirmation of biomarkers demonstrated in a mouse model of breast cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Whiteaker; Heidi Zhang; Lei Zhao; Pei Wang; Karen S Kelly-Spratt; Richard G Ivey; Brian D Piening; Li-Chia Feng; Erik Kasarda; Kay E Gurley; Jimmy K Eng; Lewis A Chodosh; Christopher J Kemp; Martin W McIntosh; Amanda G Paulovich
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 4.466

9.  A proteome resource of ovarian cancer ascites: integrated proteomic and bioinformatic analyses to identify putative biomarkers.

Authors:  Limor Gortzak-Uzan; Alex Ignatchenko; Andreas I Evangelou; Mahima Agochiya; Kevin A Brown; Peter St Onge; Inga Kireeva; Gerold Schmitt-Ulms; Theodore J Brown; Joan Murphy; Barry Rosen; Patricia Shaw; Igor Jurisica; Thomas Kislinger
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 4.466

10.  Quantification of NTproBNP in rat serum using immunoprecipitation and LC/MS/MS: a biomarker of drug-induced cardiac hypertrophy.

Authors:  Michael Berna; Lee Ott; Steve Engle; David Watson; Philip Solter; Bradley Ackermann
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 6.986

View more
  56 in total

1.  Quantitative assessment of chromatin immunoprecipitation grade antibodies directed against histone modifications reveals patterns of co-occurring marks on histone protein molecules.

Authors:  Sally E Peach; Emily L Rudomin; Namrata D Udeshi; Steven A Carr; Jacob D Jaffe
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Absolute quantitation of isoforms of post-translationally modified proteins in transgenic organism.

Authors:  Yaojun Li; Yiwei Shu; Changchao Peng; Lin Zhu; Guangyu Guo; Ning Li
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Synthetic peptide arrays for pathway-level protein monitoring by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Johannes A Hewel; Jian Liu; Kento Onishi; Vincent Fong; Shamanta Chandran; Jonathan B Olsen; Oxana Pogoutse; Mike Schutkowski; Holger Wenschuh; Dirk F H Winkler; Larry Eckler; Peter W Zandstra; Andrew Emili
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 5.911

4.  Options and considerations when selecting a quantitative proteomics strategy.

Authors:  Bruno Domon; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  Halogenated peptides as internal standards (H-PINS): introduction of an MS-based internal standard set for liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Hamid Mirzaei; Mi-Youn Brusniak; Lukas N Mueller; Simon Letarte; Julian D Watts; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 6.  Current affairs in quantitative targeted proteomics: multiple reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Anastasia K Yocum; Arul M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic       Date:  2009-03-11

Review 7.  Status and prospects for discovery and verification of new biomarkers of cardiovascular disease by proteomics.

Authors:  Robert E Gerszten; Aarti Asnani; Steven A Carr
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 17.367

8.  Cancer proteomics--an evolving battlefield. Conference on Cancer Proteomics 2009: Mechanistic Insights, Technological Advances & Molecular Medicine.

Authors:  Ben C Collins; Thomas Y K Lau; Darran P O'Connor; Hubert Hondermarck
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 8.807

9.  Accounting for population variation in targeted proteomics.

Authors:  Grant M Fujimoto; Matthew E Monroe; Larissa Rodriguez; Chaochao Wu; Brendan MacLean; Richard D Smith; Michael J MacCoss; Samuel H Payne
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 4.466

10.  Protein quantitation through targeted mass spectrometry: the way out of biomarker purgatory?

Authors:  Steven A Carr; Leigh Anderson
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 8.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.