BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to histometrically evaluate the influence of photodynamic therapy on bone loss in furcation areas in rats with experimentally induced periodontal disease. METHODS: Ligatures were placed on the first mandibular molar in rats. Then the animals were divided into four groups: control group = no treatment; methylene blue group (MB) = treated topically with methylene blue (100 microg/ml); laser group (LLLT) = treated with low-level laser therapy; and photodynamic therapy group (PDT) = treated topically with MB followed by LLLT (4.5 J/cm(2)). Rats from all groups were sacrificed at 7, 15, or 30 days postoperatively. The area of bone loss in the furcation region of the first molar was histometrically analyzed. Data were analyzed statistically (analysis of variance and Bonferroni tests; P <0.05). RESULTS: The PDT group demonstrated less bone loss compared to the other groups at 7 days (1.986 +/- 0.417 mm(2)); at 15 days, the PDT (1.641 +/- 0.115 mm(2)) and MB groups (1.991 +/- 0.294 mm(2)) demonstrated less bone loss compared to the control (4.062 +/- 0.416 mm(2)) and LLLT (2.641 +/- 0.849 mm(2)) groups. CONCLUSION: Within the parameters used in this study, PDT may be an effective alternative for control of bone loss in furcation areas in periodontitis.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to histometrically evaluate the influence of photodynamic therapy on bone loss in furcation areas in rats with experimentally induced periodontal disease. METHODS: Ligatures were placed on the first mandibular molar in rats. Then the animals were divided into four groups: control group = no treatment; methylene blue group (MB) = treated topically with methylene blue (100 microg/ml); laser group (LLLT) = treated with low-level laser therapy; and photodynamic therapy group (PDT) = treated topically with MB followed by LLLT (4.5 J/cm(2)). Rats from all groups were sacrificed at 7, 15, or 30 days postoperatively. The area of bone loss in the furcation region of the first molar was histometrically analyzed. Data were analyzed statistically (analysis of variance and Bonferroni tests; P <0.05). RESULTS: The PDT group demonstrated less bone loss compared to the other groups at 7 days (1.986 +/- 0.417 mm(2)); at 15 days, the PDT (1.641 +/- 0.115 mm(2)) and MB groups (1.991 +/- 0.294 mm(2)) demonstrated less bone loss compared to the control (4.062 +/- 0.416 mm(2)) and LLLT (2.641 +/- 0.849 mm(2)) groups. CONCLUSION: Within the parameters used in this study, PDT may be an effective alternative for control of bone loss in furcation areas in periodontitis.
Authors: Carlos de Paula Eduardo; Patricia Moreira de Freitas; Marcella Esteves-Oliveira; Ana Cecília Corrêa Aranha; Karen Müller Ramalho; Alyne Simões; Marina Stella Bello-Silva; Jan Tunér Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2010-07-17 Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: Paula Gabriela Faciola Pessôa de Oliveira; Adriana Maria Mariano Silveira E Souza; Arthur Belém Novaes; Mário Taba; Michel Reis Messora; Daniela Bazan Palioto; Márcio Fernando Moraes Grisi; Antônio Cláudio Tedesco; Sérgio Luis Scombatti de Souza Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2016-06-28 Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: Andreas Rühling; Jutta Fanghänel; Mohammad Houshmand; Alexander Kuhr; Peter Meisel; Christian Schwahn; Thomas Kocher Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2009-10-13 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Elina A Genina; Vladimir A Titorenko; Andrey V Belikov; Alexey N Bashkatov; Valery V Tuchin Journal: J Biomed Opt Date: 2015 Impact factor: 3.170