| Literature DB >> 19823880 |
Andreas Rühling1, Jutta Fanghänel, Mohammad Houshmand, Alexander Kuhr, Peter Meisel, Christian Schwahn, Thomas Kocher.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the short-term performance of a session of single photodynamic therapy (PDT) and of a conventional ultrasonic debridement (UST) in persistent pockets of maintenance patients. In a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind clinical study, patients with chronic periodontitis with at least two persistent pockets (>4 mm) were enrolled. They were treated either with UST (n = 29) or PDT (n = 25). Clinical and microbiological examinations were performed at baseline and after 3 months. For UST, the mean probing depth was reduced from 5.3 to 4.5 mm (p = <0.001) and for PDT from 5.3 to 4.7 mm (p < 0.001) with no difference between the two treatment modalities. Microbial counts were significantly reduced about 30% to 40% immediately after debridement but returned to baseline values a 3 months irrespective of treatment. PDT is not superior to conventional mechanical treatment of persistent pockets, but it may be a meaningful therapeutic alternative; the clinical effects were too minor to draw a definitive conclusion.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19823880 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-009-0347-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Oral Investig ISSN: 1432-6981 Impact factor: 3.573