Literature DB >> 18529200

Information transfer analysis: a first look at estimation bias.

Elad Sagi1, Mario A Svirsky.   

Abstract

Information transfer analysis [G. A. Miller and P. E. Nicely, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 27, 338-352 (1955)] is a tool used to measure the extent to which speech features are transmitted to a listener, e.g., duration or formant frequencies for vowels; voicing, place and manner of articulation for consonants. An information transfer of 100% occurs when no confusions arise between phonemes belonging to different feature categories, e.g., between voiced and voiceless consonants. Conversely, an information transfer of 0% occurs when performance is purely random. As asserted by Miller and Nicely, the maximum-likelihood estimate for information transfer is biased to overestimate its true value when the number of stimulus presentations is small. This small-sample bias is examined here for three cases: a model of random performance with pseudorandom data, a data set drawn from Miller and Nicely, and reported data from three studies of speech perception by hearing impaired listeners. The amount of overestimation can be substantial, depending on the number of samples, the size of the confusion matrix analyzed, as well as the manner in which data are partitioned therein.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18529200      PMCID: PMC2677320          DOI: 10.1121/1.2897914

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  7 in total

1.  Natural vowel and consonant recognition by Laura cochlear implantees.

Authors:  A van Wieringen; J Wouters
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Toward a model for lexical access based on acoustic landmarks and distinctive features.

Authors:  Kenneth N Stevens
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Gail S Donaldson; Heather A Kreft
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Simulation of human sensory performance.

Authors:  W Wong; K H Norwich
Journal:  Biosystems       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Auditory consonant and word recognition skills of cochlear implant users.

Authors:  N Tye-Murray; R S Tyler
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Multidimensional tactile displays: identification of vibratory intensity, frequency, and contactor area.

Authors:  W M Rabinowitz; A J Houtsma; N I Durlach; L A Delhorne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Consonant confusions in noise: a study of perceptual features.

Authors:  M D Wang; R C Bilger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 1.840

  7 in total
  11 in total

1.  Current and planned cochlear implant research at New York University Laboratory for Translational Auditory Research.

Authors:  Mario A Svirsky; Matthew B Fitzgerald; Arlene Neuman; Elad Sagi; Chin-Tuan Tan; Darlene Ketten; Brett Martin
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Combined spectral and temporal enhancement to improve cochlear-implant speech perception.

Authors:  Aparajita Bhattacharya; Andrew Vandali; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The relative phonetic contributions of a cochlear implant and residual acoustic hearing to bimodal speech perception.

Authors:  Benjamin M Sheffield; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  A mathematical model of medial consonant identification by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Mario A Svirsky; Elad Sagi; Ted A Meyer; Adam R Kaiser; Su Wooi Teoh
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of spectral shifting on speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Tianhao Li; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Cross-frequency integration for consonant and vowel identification in bimodal hearing.

Authors:  Ying-Yee Kong; Louis D Braida
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Does training with amplitude modulated tones affect tone-vocoded speech perception?

Authors:  Aina Casaponsa; Ediz Sohoglu; David R Moore; Christian Füllgrabe; Katharine Molloy; Sygal Amitay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Visualization of Speech Perception Analysis via Phoneme Alignment: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  J Tilak Ratnanather; Lydia C Wang; Seung-Ho Bae; Erin R O'Neill; Elad Sagi; Daniel J Tward
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  Home-Based Speech Perception Monitoring for Clinical Use With Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Astrid van Wieringen; Sara Magits; Tom Francart; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Spoken Word Recognition Errors in Speech Audiometry: A Measure of Hearing Performance?

Authors:  Martine Coene; Anneke van der Lee; Paul J Govaerts
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-18       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.