Literature DB >> 1852815

The extended subperiosteal face lift: a definitive soft-tissue remodeling for facial rejuvenation.

O M Ramirez1, G F Maillard, A Musolas.   

Abstract

The subperiosteal face lift described by Psillakis has been criticized for not showing a more dramatic improvement over conventional brow/face lift procedures. His approach also has a significantly high incidence of nerve injury. This study reports our anatomic findings and surgical modifications, which have permitted a significant improvement in the safety of execution and clinical results using the subperiosteal face lift concept. Pertinent points of applied local anatomy and dissection techniques are as follows: First, we use extensive interconnected subperiosteal dissection that includes the entire zygomatic arch. This allows better repositioning of the deep soft tissues of the entire upper face, most of the midface, and indirectly, key structures of the lower face. Second, the upward pull of the muscles of the cheek and mouth will produce an elevation of the corner of the mouth, affecting positively the smiling mechanism, the oral frowning, and the jowls. Third, the dissection deep to both layers of the temporal fascia decreases the risk of injury to the frontalis nerve. Fourth, the temporal fascia is used as a lifter and anchoring element of the entire cheek-perioral soft tissues as opposed to the periorbital fibrofatty tissues. This will decrease the risk of injuring the frontal and zygomatic branches of the facial nerve. These modifications have been used in 28 patients. Our rate of patient satisfaction has been high, and no complications with regard to nerve injury have been observed. This compares favorably with our initial 60 patients, in whom the Psillakis or Tessier approach was used. In these patients, there was an 11 and 20 percent rate of nerve injury, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1852815

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  15 in total

Review 1.  The relationship of the fronto-temporal branches of the facial nerve to the fascias of the temporal region: a literature review applied to practical anatomical dissection.

Authors:  Niklaus Krayenbühl; Gustavo Rassier Isolan; Ahmad Hafez; M Gazi Yaşargil
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2006-11-10       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  'Optimum mobility' facelift. Part 1 - the theory.

Authors:  Nabil Fanous
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2006

Review 3.  Anatomical study of the blood supply to the skin in rhytidectomy.

Authors:  F Blanco-Dávila; G Arrendondo; O De La Garza; R Montemayor; O U Gregori; H C Vásconez
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.326

4.  Saving the frontal branch during a low fronto-orbital approach.

Authors:  J Hochberg; H Kaufman; M Ardenghy
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.326

Review 5.  [Modern face lift surgery].

Authors:  H F von Gregory; W Gubisch
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 6.  A new concept in blepharoplasty.

Authors:  R de la Plaza; L de la Cruz
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.326

7.  Clinical experience with the Medpor porous polyethylene implant.

Authors:  T Wellisz
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.326

8.  Subperiosteal brow and midface lifts.

Authors:  P D Dempsey; R M Oneal; P H Izenberg
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.326

9.  Subperiosteal facelifting: complications and the dissatisfied patient.

Authors:  M Scheflan; G F Maillard; B Cornette de St Cyr; O M Ramirez
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.326

10.  Subperiosteal facelift: open and endoscopic approach.

Authors:  A Fuente del Campo
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.326

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.