Literature DB >> 19554118

'Optimum mobility' facelift. Part 1 - the theory.

Nabil Fanous1.   

Abstract

Traditional rhytidectomy techniques, such as the cutaneous lift, the superficial musculoaponeurotic system lift, the deep plane lift and the subperiosteal lift, are mostly differentiated by their different planes of dissection. As well, many of these techniques consider the complete mobilization of tissues a prerequisite for obtaining a satisfactory result.However, is it true that the result of a rhytidectomy is linked to the choice of the dissection plane? Also, is it true that the adequacy of the surgical mobilization of tissues is vital to the outcome? The present paper discusses the above questions and introduces a factor that is believed to be crucial to the planning and success of a rhytidectomy: facial tissue mobility. The analysis of this mobility is presented and leads to the development of three theories: 'intrinsic mobility', 'surgically induced mobility' and 'optimum mobility points'. These theories form the foundation of a rhytidectomy technique termed 'optimum mobility' facelift.

Keywords:  Facelift; Optimum mobility; rhytidectomy

Year:  2006        PMID: 19554118      PMCID: PMC2585029     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Plast Surg        ISSN: 1195-2199


  44 in total

1.  Composite rhytidectomy.

Authors:  S T Hamra
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Cervicofacial rhytidectomy: the superficial plane.

Authors:  C Lassus
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.326

3.  The superficial musculo-aponeurotic system (SMAS) in the parotid and cheek area.

Authors:  V Mitz; M Peyronie
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  [Subperiosteal face-lift].

Authors:  D Krastinova-Lolov
Journal:  Ann Chir Plast Esthet       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 0.660

5.  The subperiosteal approach for the correction of the deep nasolabial fold and the central third of the face.

Authors:  O M Ramirez
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.017

Review 6.  Surgical anatomy of the SMAS: a reinvestigation.

Authors:  A K Gosain; N J Yousif; G Madiedo; D L Larson; H S Matloub; J R Sanger
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 7.  Classification of facial rejuvenation techniques based on the subperiosteal approach and ancillary procedures.

Authors:  O M Ramirez
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Mask lift and facial aesthetic sculpturing.

Authors:  D Krastinova-Lolov
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Face lift, Part 3: Plication of the superficial musculoaponeurotic system.

Authors:  R C Webster; R C Smith; K F Smith
Journal:  Head Neck Surg       Date:  1983 Nov-Dec

10.  The relationship of the superficial and deep facial fascias: relevance to rhytidectomy and aging.

Authors:  J M Stuzin; T J Baker; H L Gordon
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.730

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.