Literature DB >> 18524997

Same drug, different dosing: differences in dosing for drugs approved in the United States, Europe, and Japan.

Henry J Malinowski1, Agnes Westelinck, Junko Sato, Ting Ong.   

Abstract

With globalization of the pharmaceutical industry, newly approved drugs nearly always become available worldwide, including the 3 major pharmaceutical regions: the United States, Europe, and Japan. One might think that these drugs would have the same recommended dosing throughout the world, but this appears not to be true in many instances. The objective of this study was to identify any patterns of differences in labeled dosing. Approved labeling, for the most widely prescribed proprietary drugs in the United States, was used as a basis for this study. Dosing was compared, for common indications, for the United States, Europe, and Japan. Overall, these data indicate that there are numerous differences in approved dosing for drugs approved in all 3 regions. For about half of the drugs studied, dosing in Japan is considerably lower than the United States or Europe. Some differences in dosing are also apparent between the United States and Europe.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18524997     DOI: 10.1177/0091270008319794

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0091-2700            Impact factor:   3.126


  12 in total

1.  Discrepancies in listed adverse drug reactions in pharmaceutical product information supplied by the regulatory authorities in Denmark and the USA.

Authors:  Robert Eriksson; Lise Aagaard; Lars Juhl Jensen; Liza Borisova; Dorte Hørlück; Søren Brunak; Ebba Holme Hansen
Journal:  Pharmacol Res Perspect       Date:  2014-04-22

2.  Differences in maximum tolerated doses and approval doses of molecularly targeted oncology drug between Japan and Western countries.

Authors:  Hideki Maeda; Tatsuo Kurokawa
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 3.  Precision medicine: does ethnicity information complement genotype-based prescribing decisions?

Authors:  Rashmi R Shah; Andrea Gaedigk
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2017-12-01

4.  Application of Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling for the Prediction of Tofacitinib Exposure in Japanese.

Authors:  Misaki Suzuki; Susanna Tse; Midori Hirai; Yoichi Kurebayashi
Journal:  Kobe J Med Sci       Date:  2017-05-09

5.  Study on inter-ethnic human differences in bioactivation and detoxification of estragole using physiologically based kinetic modeling.

Authors:  Jia Ning; Jochem Louisse; Bert Spenkelink; Sebastiaan Wesseling; Ivonne M C M Rietjens
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 5.153

6.  In vitro-in silico-based prediction of inter-individual and inter-ethnic variations in the dose-dependent cardiotoxicity of R- and S-methadone in humans.

Authors:  Miaoying Shi; Yumeng Dong; Hans Bouwmeester; Ivonne M C M Rietjens; Marije Strikwold
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 6.168

7.  Differences in cytochrome p450-mediated pharmacokinetics between chinese and caucasian populations predicted by mechanistic physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling.

Authors:  Zoe E Barter; Geoffrey T Tucker; Karen Rowland-Yeo
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Exploratory Analysis of Associations Between Postmarketing Safety Events and Approved Doses of New Drugs in Japan.

Authors:  T K Okubo; S Ono
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 4.689

9.  Current Perspectives on rosuvastatin.

Authors:  Miao Hu; Brian Tomlinson
Journal:  Integr Blood Press Control       Date:  2013-04-18

10.  Comparison of the safety information on drug labels in three developed countries: The USA, UK and Canada.

Authors:  Thamir M Alshammari; Venkat Ratnam Devadasu; Rajendra Prasad Rathnam
Journal:  Saudi Pharm J       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 4.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.