Literature DB >> 24615632

Differences in maximum tolerated doses and approval doses of molecularly targeted oncology drug between Japan and Western countries.

Hideki Maeda1, Tatsuo Kurokawa.   

Abstract

Approved doses of a number of drugs in Japan are known to be different from those in the United States (US) and the European Union (EU), and doses are often set lower for the Japanese than for the western people. Similarly, some oncology drugs also have lower dose approved for the Japanese than for the western people. A total of 40 oncology drugs were approved as new molecular entities in Japan between 2001 and 2013. Of the 40 drugs, 21 were molecularly targeted drugs and 13 were cytotoxic drugs. Five (12.5 %) of the 40 drugs had different approved dose from that in the US and the EU. Of the 13 cytotoxic drugs, four drugs (30.8 %) differed in approved dose, while all the molecularly targeted drugs (21 of 21 drugs) had the same approved dose. We compared the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the 21 molecularly targeted drugs in the Japanese with that in the western people and found that the MTD was determined lower in the Japanese than that in the western people (two drugs), was not different (10 drugs), and MTD was not determined in the Japanese and incommensurable because of the different dose range tested in Japan (nine drugs). All the molecularly targeted drugs are the same in approved doses and few molecularly targeted drugs differ in MTD between Japan and the Western countries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24615632     DOI: 10.1007/s10637-014-0080-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest New Drugs        ISSN: 0167-6997            Impact factor:   3.850


  20 in total

1.  A phase II Study of the global dose and schedule of capecitabine in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ichinosuke Hyodo; Kuniaki Shirao; Toshihiko Doi; Kiyohiko Hatake; Yasuaki Arai; Kensei Yamaguchi; Takao Tamura; Shoji Takemiya; Hiroya Takiuchi; Kazuhiko Nakagawa; Hideyuki Mishima
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Ethical and scientific implications of the globalization of clinical research.

Authors:  Seth W Glickman; John G McHutchison; Eric D Peterson; Charles B Cairns; Robert A Harrington; Robert M Califf; Kevin A Schulman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Same drug, different dosing: differences in dosing for drugs approved in the United States, Europe, and Japan.

Authors:  Henry J Malinowski; Agnes Westelinck; Junko Sato; Ting Ong
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 3.126

4.  Regulatory challenges in the review of data from global clinical trials: the PMDA perspective.

Authors:  K Asano; A Tanaka; T Sato; Y Uyama
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  Japan works to shorten "drug lag," boost trials of new drugs.

Authors:  Gunjan Sinha
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 6.  Effective global drug development strategy for obtaining regulatory approval in Japan in the context of ethnicity-related drug response factors.

Authors:  K Ichimaru; S Toyoshima; Y Uyama
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 6.875

7.  Phase III study of docetaxel compared with vinorelbine in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results of the West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group Trial (WJTOG 9904).

Authors:  Shinzoh Kudoh; Koji Takeda; Kazuhiko Nakagawa; Minoru Takada; Nobuyuki Katakami; Kaoru Matsui; Tetsu Shinkai; Toshiyuki Sawa; Isao Goto; Hiroshi Semba; Takashi Seto; Masahiko Ando; Taroh Satoh; Naruo Yoshimura; Shunichi Negoro; Masahiro Fukuoka
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  The value and benefits of the International Conference on Harmonisation to drug regulatory authorities: advancing harmonization for better public health.

Authors:  J A Molzon; A Giaquinto; L Lindstrom; T Tominaga; M Ward; P Doerr; L Hunt; L Rago
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 6.875

9.  Performing phase I clinical trials of anticancer agents: perspectives from within the European union and Japan.

Authors:  Martin D Forster; Nagahiro Saijo; Lesley Seymour; Hilary Calvert
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Bicalutamide 80 mg combined with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist (LHRH-A) versus LHRH-A monotherapy in advanced prostate cancer: findings from a phase III randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial in Japanese patients.

Authors:  M Usami; H Akaza; Y Arai; Y Hirano; S Kagawa; H Kanetake; S Naito; Y Sumiyoshi; Y Takimoto; A Terai; H Yoshida; Y Ohashi
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2007-01-02       Impact factor: 5.554

View more
  10 in total

1.  Recent trends for drug lag in clinical development of oncology drugs in Japan: does the oncology drug lag still exist in Japan?

Authors:  Hideki Maeda; Tatsuo Kurokawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  The drug lag and associated factors for orphan anticancer drugs in Japan compared to the United States.

Authors:  Hiroki Nakayama; Naoki Matsumaru; Katsura Tsukamoto
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 3.  Precision medicine: does ethnicity information complement genotype-based prescribing decisions?

Authors:  Rashmi R Shah; Andrea Gaedigk
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2017-12-01

4.  Unique characteristics of regulatory approval and pivotal studies of orphan anticancer drugs in Japan.

Authors:  Hiroki Nakayama; Katsura Tsukamoto
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.850

5.  Surveys/Research Exploring Japanese Phase I Studies in Global Drug Development: Are They Necessary Prior to Joining Global Clinical Trials?

Authors:  Masaru Hirano; Masanori Yamada; Toshiaki Tanaka; Toshiko Koue; Tomohisa Saito; Mitsuo Higashimori; Hisao Ochiai; Junichi Yamamoto; Saori Yaguchi; Sachiko Mita; Katsutoshi Hara
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev       Date:  2021-11-26

6.  Impact of race on dose selection of molecular-targeted agents in early-phase oncology trials.

Authors:  Tomoya Yokota; Johanna Bendell; Patricia LoRusso; Takahiro Tsushima; Ved Desai; Hirotsugu Kenmotsu; Junichiro Watanabe; Akira Ono; Bhavani Murugesan; Joseph Silva; Tateaki Naito; Jonathan Greenberg; Prasanna Kumar; Yibin Wang; Takahiro Jikoh; Ryota Shiga; David M Hyman; Alan Loh Ho; David R Spriggs; Gary K Schwartz; Mrinal M Gounder
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  An adaptive power prior for sequential clinical trials - Application to bridging studies.

Authors:  Adrien Ollier; Satoshi Morita; Moreno Ursino; Sarah Zohar
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 3.021

8.  Estimating Similarity of Dose-Response Relationships in Phase I Clinical Trials-Case Study in Bridging Data Package.

Authors:  Adrien Ollier; Sarah Zohar; Satoshi Morita; Moreno Ursino
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Trends of Phase I Clinical Trials of New Drugs in Mainland China Over the Past 10 Years (2011-2020).

Authors:  Chen Chen; Ning Lou; Xin Zheng; Shasha Wang; Haizhu Chen; Xiaohong Han
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-12-17

Review 10.  Toward Optimum Benefit-Risk and Reduced Access Lag For Cancer Drugs in Asia: A Global Development Framework Guided by Clinical Pharmacology Principles.

Authors:  K Venkatakrishnan; C Burgess; N Gupta; A Suri; T Takubo; X Zhou; D DeMuria; M Lehnert; K Takeyama; S Singhvi; A Milton
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 4.689

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.