| Literature DB >> 35604418 |
Miaoying Shi1,2, Yumeng Dong3, Hans Bouwmeester3, Ivonne M C M Rietjens3, Marije Strikwold4.
Abstract
New approach methodologies predicting human cardiotoxicity are of interest to support or even replace in vivo-based drug safety testing. The present study presents an in vitro-in silico approach to predict the effect of inter-individual and inter-ethnic kinetic variations in the cardiotoxicity of R- and S-methadone in the Caucasian and the Chinese population. In vitro cardiotoxicity data, and metabolic data obtained from two approaches, using either individual human liver microsomes or recombinant cytochrome P450 enzymes (rCYPs), were integrated with physiologically based kinetic (PBK) models and Monte Carlo simulations to predict inter-individual and inter-ethnic variations in methadone-induced cardiotoxicity. Chemical specific adjustment factors were defined and used to derive dose-response curves for the sensitive individuals. Our simulations indicated that Chinese are more sensitive towards methadone-induced cardiotoxicity with Margin of Safety values being generally two-fold lower than those for Caucasians for both methadone enantiomers. Individual PBK models using microsomes and PBK models using rCYPs combined with Monte Carlo simulations predicted similar inter-individual and inter-ethnic variations in methadone-induced cardiotoxicity. The present study illustrates how inter-individual and inter-ethnic variations in cardiotoxicity can be predicted by combining in vitro toxicity and metabolic data, PBK modelling and Monte Carlo simulations. The novel methodology can be used to enhance cardiac safety evaluations and risk assessment of chemicals.Entities:
Keywords: Human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CM); Inter-individual differences; Methadone; Monte Carlo simulation; New approach methodologies (NAM); Physiologically based kinetic (PBK) modelling; Quantitative in vitro to in vivo extrapolation (QIVIVE)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35604418 PMCID: PMC9217890 DOI: 10.1007/s00204-022-03309-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Toxicol ISSN: 0340-5761 Impact factor: 6.168
Summary of kinetic parameters for conversion of R- and S- methadone to R- and S-EDDP by CYP2B6, CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 and the hepatic CYP abundances, genotypes and corresponding phenotype frequencies
| CYP | R-methadone | S-methadone | Caucasian | Chinese | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vmax, CYP (pmol/min/pmol CYP)a | Km, CYP (µM)a, b | ISEF (Caucasian/Chinese) | Catalytic efficiency (µl/min/mg protein) (Caucasian/Chinese) | Vmax, CYP (pmol/min/pmol CYP)a | Km, CYP (µM)a, b | ISEF (Caucasian/Chinese) | Catalytic efficiency (µl/min/mg protein) (Caucasian/Chinese) | Phenotype (frequency) | Mean abundance (μx, pmol/mg protein) | CV (%) | Phenotype (frequency) | Mean abundance (μx, pmol/mg protein) | CV (%) | |
| 2B6 | 36 | 60 | 0.13/0.072 | 1.16/0.22 | 15 | 16 | 0.13/0.049 | 1.81/0.24 | EM (0.89)c | 17c | 122c | EM (0.95)d | 5.3c | 198c |
| PM (0.11)c | 6c | 200c | PM (0.05)d | 1.9c | 200c | |||||||||
| 2C19 | 22 | 97 | 0.1/0.047 | 0.25/0.05 | 8 | 125 | 0.39/0.13 | 0.27/0.04 | General group | 11e | 82e | EM (0.87)c | 4.4c | 39c |
| 3A4 | 43 | 137 | 0.04/0.0062 | 1.21/0.23 | 46 | 149 | 0.03/0.0034 | 0.97/0.13 | General group | 93e | 81e | EM (1)d | 120f | 33f |
ISEF inter-system extrapolation factors, EM extensive metabolizer, PM poor metabolizer
aValues were obtained from the global analysis of racemate metabolism reported in Totah et al. (2007)
bThe reported dissociation constant (Ks) was used as Km assuming rapid equilibrium for formation of the enzyme methadone complex (dissociation of enzyme methadone complex rate constant, k2 > > the complex to the products conversion rate constant, k3)
cObtained from the Simcyp simulator V18 Release 1 (Certara)
dBased on Guan et al. (2006)
eValues were summarized by Achour et al. (2014) from different studies
fReported by Shu et al. (2000)
Fig. 1Schematic diagram of the PBK model of R- and S-methadone
Descriptive statistic of the kinetic constants Vmax, Km and catalytic efficiencies for R-EDDP and S-EDDP formation by 25 Caucasian and 25 Chinese individual human liver microsomes
| Caucasian individuals | Chinese individuals | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R-EDDP formation | S-EDDP formation | R-EDDP formation | S-EDDP formation | |||||||||
| Vmaxa | Kmb | Catalytic efficiencyc | Vmaxa | Kmb | Catalytic efficiencyc | Vmaxa | Kmb | Catalytic efficiencyc | Vmaxa | Kmb | Catalytic efficiencyc | |
| Mean (μx) | 0.40 | 155.1 | 2.87 | 0.34 | 111.3 | 4.27 | 0.064 | 127.7 | 0.55 | 0.046 | 115.6 | 0.47 |
| SDd | 0.324 | 42.8 | 2.64 | 0.319 | 44.2 | 5.54 | 0.031 | 42.4 | 0.35 | 0.021 | 63.6 | 0.28 |
| CVx %e | 80.3 | 27.6 | 92.1 | 93.8 | 40 | 130 | 48.5 | 33.2 | 64.3 | 46.5 | 55 | 59.8 |
| Fold-differencesf | 13 | 3 | 19 | 17 | 4 | 37 | 11 | 4 | 10 | 11 | 8 | 12 |
anmol/min/mg liver microsomes
bµM
cVmax/Km, µl/min/mg protein
dStandard deviation of kinetic constants
eCoefficients of variation, % (= SD/mean × 100)
fHighest/lowest values
Fig. 2Blood concentration–time curves of R-methadone (a, b) and S-methadone (c, d) in human predicted with the PBK model (lines) and published in vivo data (dots) (Liu et al. 2007) after a repeated oral rac-methadone dose of 100 mg/day for 30 days. a and c present predictions obtained from the model using HLM kinetic data and b and d present predictions obtained from the model using rCYPs kinetic data. The top right insert is the predicted blood concentration of R- and S-methadone (lines) and in vivo data (dots) during the last 24 h upon the oral exposure
Fig. 3Distribution of predicted unbound Cmax of R- (a) and S-methadone (b) in the heart venous blood at steady-state after a repeated oral methadone enantiomer dose of 30 mg/day for 30 days in the Caucasian and the Chinese population. The scatter plots represent the predictions obtained using individual PBK models. Whisker plots represent the predictions obtained by the Monte Carlo (MC) simulation considering the variations in metabolism only, and variations in multiple factors. The whiskers represent the 1st and 99th percentile of defined populations
CSAFs of R- and S-methadone for the Caucasian population, the Chinese population and the two populations combined, in each scenario of Monte Carlo simulation taking into account variations in metabolism, bodyweight, oral fraction absorbed and fraction unbound in plasma
| CSAFs at 95th percentile | CSAFs at 99th percentile | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caucasian populationa | Chinese populationa | Two populations combinedb | Caucasian populationa | Chinese populationa | Two populations combinedb | |
| R-methadone | 2.4 (1.7) | 1.9 (1.2) | 4.5 (3.0) | 3.1 (2.0) | 2.5 (1.3) | 5.8 (3.2) |
| S-methadone | 2.5 (1.9) | 2.1 (1.3) | 6.7 (4.5) | 3.3 (2.3) | 2.6 (1.4) | 8.3 (4.7) |
Values between brackets are the CSAFs derived on the metabolic variation only
aObtained by dividing the 95th or 99th percentile of the unbound Cmax in heart venous blood by the GM of the unbound Cmax in heart venous blood in each population
bObtained by dividing the 95th or 99th percentile of the unbound Cmax in heart venous blood in the Chinese population by the GM of the unbound Cmax in heart venous blood in the Caucasian population
Fig. 4Frequency distribution for unbound Cmax of R-methadone (a, b) and S-methadone (c, d) in the heart venous blood at steady-state after a repeated oral methadone enantiomer dose of 30 mg/day for 30 days in Caucasian (a, c) and Chinese (b, d) individuals by the Monte Carlo simulation considering variations in multiple factors. The GM and P99 represent the geometric mean and the 99th percentile of the distribution
Fig. 5Predicted dose–response curves for the cardiotoxicity of R-methadone (a, b) and S-(c, d) methadone in the average (solid lines) and the sensitive population (99th percentile of predicted Cmax in heart venous blood) (dotted lines) of Caucasian (a, c) and Chinese (b, d) population. The dose–response curves for sensitive Caucasian and Chinese populations were obtained by applying the respective CSAFs (calculated based on variations in metabolism, bodyweight, oral fraction absorbed and fraction unbound in plasma.) to the dose–response curves of the average populations
The predicted BMDL10 values for the average and the sensitive (99th percentile of predicted Cmax in heart venous blood) of the Caucasian and Chinese population obtained by the CSAFs derived from the Monte Carlo simulation considering variations in metabolism, bodyweight, oral fraction absorbed and fraction unbound in plasma
| Caucasian population | Chinese population | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R-methadone | S-methadone | R-methadone | S-methadone | |
| BMDL10 (mg/day) for the average population | 99.6 | 18.7 | 39.5 | 5.1 |
| BMDL10 (mg/day) for sensitive population | 32.4 | 5.5 | 15.8 | 1.9 |
Summary of Margin of Safety (MOS) values for R- and S-methadone for the Caucasian and Chinese population
| Enantiomer | Stage dosing | Effective dose (rac-methadone mg/day) | Toxic dosea | Margin of Safety (MOS)b | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (enantiomer mg/day) | ||||||
| Caucasian | Chinese | Caucasian | Chinese | |||
| R-methadone | Initial | 10 | 32.4 | 15.8 | 3.2 | 1.6 |
| Maintenance | 60 | 32.4 | 15.8 | 0.5 | 0.3 | |
| S-methadone | Initial | 10 | 5.5 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Maintenance | 60 | 5.5 | 1.9 | 0.09 | 0.03 | |
The MOS is defined as the ratio between the predicted BMDL10 of the enantiomers for the sensitive population (99th percentile of the Cmax in the heart venous blood) and the therapeutic dose of rac-methadone
aBMDL10 values for the sensitive population (99th percentile of Cmax in heart venous blood) were used as toxic dose for 1% population (TD1)
bObtained by dividing TD1 by effective dose