Literature DB >> 18524176

Porcine models in spinal research: calibration and comparative finite element analysis of various configurations during flexion-extension.

Hadi N Aziz1, Fabio Galbusera, Chiara Maria Bellini, Giuseppe Vincenzo Mineo, Alessandro Addis, Riccardo Pietrabissa, Marco Brayda-Bruno.   

Abstract

This study was conducted to develop and calibrate a detailed 3-dimensional finite element model of the porcine lumbar spine and to compare this model with various configurations in flexion and extension. Computed tomography scans obtained from the L4-L5 lumbar segment of a Landrace x Large White pig were used to generate a solid volume. The various passive components were characterized by using a step-by-step calibration procedure in which the material properties of the anatomic structures were modified to match the corresponding in vitro data set-points retrieved from the literature. The range of motion of the totally assembled intact model was assessed under a 10-Nm flexion-extension moment and compared with data from a bilateral complete and hemifacetectomy configuration. In addition, the results from our porcine model were compared with published data regarding range of motion in a human finite element model in order to predict the configuration of the porcine model that most closely represented the human spine. Both the intact and hemifacetectomy configurations of the porcine model were comparable to the human spine. However, qualitative analysis of the instantaneous axis of rotation revealed a dissimilarity between the intact porcine model and human spine behavior, indicating the hemifacetectomy configuration of the porcine model as the most appropriate for spinal instrumentation studies. The present 3-dimensional finite element porcine model offers an additional tool to improve understanding of the biomechanics of the porcine spine and to decrease the expense of spinal research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18524176      PMCID: PMC2703168     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comp Med        ISSN: 1532-0820            Impact factor:   0.982


  24 in total

1.  In vitro torsion-induced stress distribution changes in porcine intervertebral discs.

Authors:  D L van Deursen; C J Snijders; I Kingma; J H van Dieën
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Finite element analysis in spine research.

Authors:  M J Fagan; S Julian; A M Mohsen
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.617

3.  Spatial and structural dependence of mechanical properties of porcine intervertebral disc.

Authors:  F Causa; L Manto; A Borzacchiello; R De Santis; P A Netti; L Ambrosio; L Nicolais
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Relationship between CT intensity, micro-architecture and mechanical properties of porcine vertebral cancellous bone.

Authors:  Jeremy C M Teo; Kuan Ming Si-Hoe; Justin E L Keh; Swee Hin Teoh
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2005-12-13       Impact factor: 2.063

5.  Estimation of Young's modulus in swine cortical bone using quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  N Kato; T Koshino; T Saito; R Takeuchi
Journal:  Bull Hosp Jt Dis       Date:  1998

6.  Posterior lumbar interbody fusion. A biomechanical comparison, including a new threaded cage.

Authors:  D S Brodke; J C Dick; D N Kunz; R McCabe; T A Zdeblick
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Biomechanical evaluation of anterior thoracolumbar spinal instrumentation.

Authors:  H S An; T H Lim; J W You; J H Hong; J Eck; L McGrady
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Are sheep spines a valid biomechanical model for human spines?

Authors:  H J Wilke; A Kettler; L E Claes
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Comparison of animals used in disc research to human lumbar disc geometry.

Authors:  Grace D O'Connell; Edward J Vresilovic; Dawn M Elliott
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Comparative morphometry of L4 vertebrae: comparison of large animal models for the human lumbar spine.

Authors:  Robert F McLain; Scott A Yerby; Timothy A Moseley
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  1 in total

1.  Spinal fixation after laminectomy in pigs prevents postoperative spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Emma M H Slot; Bart de Boer; Saskia Redegeld; Sander van Thoor; Nizar Moayeri; Willem-Bart Slooff; Irene A Schaafsma; Björn Meij; Tristan P C van Doormaal
Journal:  Animal Model Exp Med       Date:  2022-02-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.