Literature DB >> 9355217

Are sheep spines a valid biomechanical model for human spines?

H J Wilke1, A Kettler, L E Claes.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Range of motion, neutral zone, and stiffness parameters of the complete cervical, thoracic, and lumbar sheep spine were determined in flexion and extension, axial left/right rotation, and right/left lateral bending.
OBJECTIVES: To determine quantitative biomechanical properties of the sheep spine and compare them with those from the human spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Sheep spines often serve as a model for experimental in vivo and in vitro studies in spine research, but few quantitative biomechanical data from sheep spines for comparison with human specimens are available.
METHODS: Complete spines were sectioned into single-joint segments and tested in a spine tester under pure moments in the three main anatomic planes.
RESULTS: The craniocaudal variation in range of motion in all load directions was qualitatively similar between sheep spines and values reported in the literature for human specimens.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the biomechanical similarities of sheep and human spines demonstrated in this study, it appears that the use of the sheep spine, which already includes evaluation of surgical techniques and bone healing processes, might be extended to spinal implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9355217     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199710150-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  103 in total

1.  Viscoelastic properties of the nucleus pulposus of the intervertebral disk in compression.

Authors:  J C Leahy; D W Hukins
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  On how nucleus-endplate integration is achieved at the fibrillar level in the ovine lumbar disc.

Authors:  Kelly R Wade; Peter A Robertson; Neil D Broom
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Evaluation of ABM/P-15 versus autogenous bone in an ovine lumbar interbody fusion model.

Authors:  Blake P Sherman; Emily M Lindley; A Simon Turner; Howard B Seim; James Benedict; Evalina L Burger; Vikas V Patel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  A novel sheep vertebral bone defect model for injectable bioactive vertebral augmentation materials.

Authors:  X S Zhu; Z M Zhang; H Q Mao; D C Geng; J Zou; G L Wang; Z G Zhang; J H Wang; L Chen; H L Yang
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Development of subject-specific geometric spine model through use of automated active contour segmentation and kinematic constraint-limited registration.

Authors:  Catherine G Strickland; Daniel E Aguiar; Eric A Nauman; Thomas M Talavage
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Evaluation of unilateral cage-instrumented fixation for lumbar spine.

Authors:  Ti-Sheng Chang; Jia-Hao Chang; Chien-Shiung Wang; Hung-Yi Chen; Ching-Wei Cheng
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Foreword, Biomechanics Special Issue.

Authors:  Boyle Cheng; Vijay Goel
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-17

8.  Development of an in vivo method to investigate biomechanical and neurophysiological properties of spine facet joint capsules.

Authors:  Ying Lu; Chaoyang Chen; Srinivasu Kallakuri; Ajit Patwardhan; John M Cavanaugh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-02-03       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Biomechanical study of a hat type cervical intervertebral fusion cage.

Authors:  Yu-Tong Gu; Lian-Shun Jia; Tong-Yi Chen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Determination of torque-limits for human and cat lumbar spine specimens during displacement-controlled physiological motions.

Authors:  Allyson Ianuzzi; Joel G Pickar; Partap S Khalsa
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 4.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.