Chris H Van Leuvan1, Imogen Mitchell. 1. Faculty of Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT. chris.vanleuvan@gmail.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of monitoring of patient vital signs in two wards of a tertiary hospital. METHODS: A retrospective observational study of patient charts from two wards was conducted for a 48-hour period (Sunday and Monday, 23 and 24 October 2005). All vital sign readings from all patient charts were collected. RESULTS: 1597 unique vital signs were recorded in 62 patients. Frequency of documentation was significantly lower for respiratory rate than for all other vital sign measurements: respiratory rate, 1.0 reading/day, versus blood pressure, 5.0 readings/day; heart rate, 4.4 readings/ day; and temperature, 4.2 readings/day (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). Comparisons between blood pressure, heart rate and temperature frequency measurements showed no statistical differences, but there were significant differences in overall collection frequency between the medical and the surgical ward (3.0 v 5.0 readings/day, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Blood pressure, heart rate and temperature were the most diligently recorded vital signs, but documentation of respiratory rate was poor. Failure to perform vital sign measurements may underpin the failure to recognise patients in general wards whose condition is deteriorating.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of monitoring of patient vital signs in two wards of a tertiary hospital. METHODS: A retrospective observational study of patient charts from two wards was conducted for a 48-hour period (Sunday and Monday, 23 and 24 October 2005). All vital sign readings from all patient charts were collected. RESULTS: 1597 unique vital signs were recorded in 62 patients. Frequency of documentation was significantly lower for respiratory rate than for all other vital sign measurements: respiratory rate, 1.0 reading/day, versus blood pressure, 5.0 readings/day; heart rate, 4.4 readings/ day; and temperature, 4.2 readings/day (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). Comparisons between blood pressure, heart rate and temperature frequency measurements showed no statistical differences, but there were significant differences in overall collection frequency between the medical and the surgical ward (3.0 v 5.0 readings/day, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Blood pressure, heart rate and temperature were the most diligently recorded vital signs, but documentation of respiratory rate was poor. Failure to perform vital sign measurements may underpin the failure to recognise patients in general wards whose condition is deteriorating.
Authors: Jessica Spence; Yannick LeManach; Matthew TV Chan; C Y Wang; Alben Sigamani; Denis Xavier; Rupert Pearse; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Ignacio Garutti; Sadeesh K Srinathan; Emmanuelle Duceppe; Michael Walsh; Flavia Kessler Borges; German Malaga; Valsa Abraham; Atiya Faruqui; Otavio Berwanger; Bruce M Biccard; Juan Carlos Villar; Daniel I Sessler; Andrea Kurz; Clara K Chow; Carisi A Polanczyk; Wojciech Szczeklik; Gareth Ackland; Garg Amit X; Michael Jacka; Gordon H Guyatt; Robert J Sapsford; Colin Williams; Olga Lucia Cortes; Pierre Coriat; Ameen Patel; Maria Tiboni; Emilie P Belley-Côté; Stephen Yang; Diane Heels-Ansdell; Michael McGillion; Simon Parlow; Matthew Patel; Shirley Pettit; Salim Yusuf; P J Devereaux Journal: CMAJ Date: 2019-07-29 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Armando D Bedoya; Nrupen A Bhavsar; Bhargav Adagarla; Courtney B Page; Benjamin A Goldstein; Neil R MacIntyre Journal: Respir Care Date: 2020-03-10 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: Zhuo Sun; Daniel I Sessler; Jarrod E Dalton; P J Devereaux; Aram Shahinyan; Amanda J Naylor; Matthew T Hutcherson; Patrick S Finnegan; Vikas Tandon; Saeed Darvish-Kazem; Shaan Chugh; Hussain Alzayer; Andrea Kurz Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 6.627