Literature DB >> 18520874

The impact of obesity on patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction.

Dunya M Atisha1, Amy K Alderman, Latoya E Kuhn, Edwin G Wilkins.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As the U.S. population becomes increasingly overweight, a growing number of patients with body mass indexes greater than 30 are seeking mastectomy reconstruction. The authors' purpose was to prospectively evaluate the effect of body mass index on patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction.
METHODS: Women undergoing first-time breast reconstruction at one of 12 centers in the United States and Canada were surveyed preoperatively and at postoperative year 1. Satisfaction was evaluated with two scales assessing general and aesthetic satisfaction. Using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria, patients were classified as normal weight, overweight, or obese. Logistic regressions evaluated the effects of body mass index on patient satisfaction with expander/implant, pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap, and free TRAM flap techniques while controlling for patient age and timing of reconstruction.
RESULTS: Data were available for a total of 262 patients. Patient body mass index had a significant effect on aesthetic satisfaction, particularly among patients undergoing expander/implant procedures. Compared with normal weight individuals, obese patients with expander/implants were significantly less satisfied aesthetically (odds ratio, 0.14, p = 0.02). However, there was no significant difference between obese and normal weight patients in aesthetic satisfaction with TRAM flap reconstruction. Finally, body mass index had no significant effects on general satisfaction for either expander/implant or TRAM flap technique.
CONCLUSION: Although previous investigators have reported relatively high complication rates and modest aesthetic results for breast reconstruction in overweight and obese women, the authors' study suggests that patient satisfaction with reconstruction is surprisingly high in this population, particularly in cases of autogenous tissue reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18520874     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181715198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  13 in total

1.  Body image screening for cancer patients undergoing reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Michelle Cororve Fingeret; Summer Nipomnick; Michele Guindani; Donald Baumann; Matthew Hanasono; Melissa Crosby
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Restoring Breast Volume in High BMI Patients: A Single-Center Review of Breast Reconstruction Using Hyperinflated Saline Implants.

Authors:  Milind D Kachare; Swapnil D Kachare; Bradley J Vivace; Omar Elfanagely; Brooke Barrow; Adam O'Toole; Alyssa M Simpson; Rachel Safeek; Joshua H Choo; Terry M McCurry; Bradon J Wilhelmi
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2022-07-21

Review 3.  Developing a theoretical framework to illustrate associations among patient satisfaction, body image and quality of life for women undergoing breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Michelle Cororve Fingeret; Summer W Nipomnick; Melissa A Crosby; Gregory P Reece
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 12.111

4.  Obesity Should Not Prevent from TRAM Flap Breast Reconstruction in Developing Countries.

Authors:  Sadaf Alipour; Ramesh Omranipour; Rahim Akrami
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 0.656

5.  Single dual-trained surgeon for breast care leads to higher reconstruction rates after mastectomy.

Authors:  Ashkaun Shaterian; Salim C Saba; Brittany Yee; Christopher Tokin; Brian Mailey; Marek K Dobke; Anne M Wallace
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Tissue Expander versus Tissue Expander and Latissimus Flap in Morbidly Obese Breast Reconstruction Patients.

Authors:  Edward A Luce; Robert L Adams; Robert G Chandler; Joseph Parks
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-04-07

7.  Health Service Quality Scale: Brazilian Portuguese translation, reliability and validity.

Authors:  Luiz Roberto Martins Rocha; Daniela Francescato Veiga; Paulo Rocha e Oliveira; Elaine Horibe Song; Lydia Masako Ferreira
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Satisfaction following Unilateral Breast Reconstruction: A Comparison of Pedicled TRAM and Free Abdominal Flaps.

Authors:  Jonathan A Schwitzer; H Catherine Miller; Andrea L Pusic; Evan Matros; Babak J Mehrara; Colleen M McCarthy; Peter A Lennox; Nancy Van Laeken; Joseph J Disa
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-08-19

9.  Time to be BRAVE: is educating surgeons the key to unlocking the potential of randomised clinical trials in surgery? A qualitative study.

Authors:  Shelley Potter; Nicola Mills; Simon J Cawthorn; Jenny Donovan; Jane M Blazeby
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 10.  Is obesity a predisposing factor for free flap failure and complications? Comparison between breast and nonbreast reconstruction: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jin Yong Shin; Si-Gyun Roh; Nae-Ho Lee; Kyung-Moo Yang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.