Literature DB >> 18516594

Tibial aperture bone disruption after retrograde versus antegrade tibial tunnel drilling: a cadaveric study.

Timothy R McAdams1, Sandip Biswal, Kathryn J Stevens, Christopher F Beaulieu, Bert R Mandelbaum.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare the local microfracture effects of antegrade versus retrograde drilling of the tibial tunnel in ACL reconstruction. Arthroscopic ACL excision was performed on eight matched cadaveric knees. Arthroscopic guided tibial tunnel reaming was performed in either an antegrade (four) or retrograde (four) direction. A 3 x 3 cm section of proximal tibial surrounding the tibial aperture was removed with open dissection, and each section underwent micro-computed tomography analysis. Three musculoskeletal radiologists graded the specimens for bone aperture disruption and discrete fracture lines. Tibial aperture irregularity was seen in all four of the antegrade specimens (mean, Grade 1.5), and in none of the retrograde specimens. Discrete fracture lines were present in all four antegrade specimens (mean 10.13 mm depth; 8.95 mm length). No fracture lines were seen in the retrograde group. Retrograde drilling of the tibial tunnel in ACL reconstruction results in less microfracture trauma to the surrounding aperture bone. The use of retrograde drilling in ACL reconstruction may decrease synovialization of the graft-tissue interface when compared to antegrade drilling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18516594     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-008-0554-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  11 in total

1.  Interarticular bone tunnel healing.

Authors:  E E Berg; M E Pollard; Q Kang
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Tendon healing in a bone tunnel. Part II: Histologic analysis after biodegradable interference fit fixation in a model of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in sheep.

Authors:  Andreas Weiler; Reinhard F G Hoffmann; Hermann J Bail; Oliver Rehm; Norbert P Südkamp
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  The effect of outlet fixation on tunnel widening.

Authors:  F Alan Barber; Bryan Spruill; Maryann Sheluga
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Anatomic tibial graft fixation using a retrograde bio-interference screw for endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Craig D Morgan; Drew A Stein; Elliot H Leitman; Victor R Kalman
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: bone-patellar tendon-bone compared with double semitendinosus and gracilis tendon grafts. A prospective, randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Paolo Aglietti; Francesco Giron; Roberto Buzzi; Flavio Biddau; Francesco Sasso
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  No-tunnel anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the transtibial all-inside technique.

Authors:  James H Lubowitz
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 7.  Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: fact or fiction?

Authors:  J Höher; H D Möller; F H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  The effect of anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation site at the tibia on knee stability: evaluation using a robotic testing system.

Authors:  Y Ishibashi; T W Rudy; G A Livesay; J D Stone; F H Fu; S L Woo
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Tendon healing in a bone tunnel differs at the tunnel entrance versus the tunnel exit: an effect of graft-tunnel motion?

Authors:  Scott A Rodeo; Sumito Kawamura; Hyon-Jeong Kim; Christian Dynybil; Liang Ying
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a metaanalysis comparing patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts.

Authors:  Kevin B Freedman; Michael J D'Amato; David D Nedeff; Ari Kaz; Bernard R Bach
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  6 in total

1.  Quantification of tibial bone loss in antegrade versus retrograde tunnel placement for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael Osti; Alessa Krawinkel; Thomas Hoffelner; Karl Peter Benedetto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  All-inside ACL reconstruction: How does it compare to standard ACL reconstruction techniques?

Authors:  Alexander J Connaughton; Andrew G Geeslin; Christopher W Uggen
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2017-03-19

3.  Effect of tibial drill-guide angle on the mechanical environment at bone tunnel aperture after anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Jie Yao; Chun Yi Wen; Ming Zhang; Jason Tak-Man Cheung; Chunhoi Yan; Kwong-Yuen Chiu; William Weijia Lu; Yubo Fan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  No difference at two years between all inside transtibial technique and traditional transtibial technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Piero Volpi; Corrado Bait; Matteo Cervellin; Matteo Denti; Emanuele Prospero; Emanuela Morenghi; Alessandro Quaglia
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2014-05-08

5.  The Effect of Different Sagittal Angles of the Tibial Guide on Aperture Widening of the Tibial Tunnel during Modified Transtibial Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Randomized In Vivo Study.

Authors:  Young Chan Kim; Tulyapruek Tawonsawatruk; Hyeong Hwa Woon; Ji Woong Yum; Myung Jin Shin; Rodolfo S Bravo; Kyung Wook Nha
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2017-03-01

Review 6.  Transportal versus all-inside techniques of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rohan Bhimani; Reza Shahriarirad; Keivan Ranjbar; Amirhossein Erfani; Soheil Ashkani-Esfahani
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 2.359

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.