| Literature DB >> 28231645 |
Young Chan Kim1, Tulyapruek Tawonsawatruk2, Hyeong Hwa Woon1, Ji Woong Yum1, Myung Jin Shin1, Rodolfo S Bravo3, Kyung Wook Nha1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The effect of sagittal plane angle of the tibial tunnel on the severity of tibial intra-articular aperture expansion caused by iatrogenic re-reaming in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using a modified transtibial technique is unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare the severity of intra-articular aperture widening at different angles (40°, 45°, and 50°) of the tibial guide (TG).Entities:
Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament; Aperture widening; Knee; Reconstruction; Tibial tunnel
Year: 2017 PMID: 28231645 PMCID: PMC5336372 DOI: 10.5792/ksrr.16.033
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Knee Surg Relat Res ISSN: 2234-0726
Fig. 1Flow diagram of the study. ACL: anterior cruciate ligament, OB: Outerbridge, TG: tibial guide, F/U: follow-up.
Comparison of Demographic Characteristics and Mediolateral Width of the Proximal Tibia among the TG 40°, 45°, and 50° Groups
| Parameter | TG 40° | TG 45° | TG 50° | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of female subjects | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0.75 |
| Age (yr) | 31±11 (17–30) | 38.5±15 (17–75) | 36±11 (17–59) | 0.06 |
| Height (cm) | 171±8 (152–184) | 168±8 (151–182) | 171.5±7.5 (150–182) | 0.29 |
| Weight (kg) | 71±13 (50.0–99.0) | 70.5±12 (50.0–90.0) | 73±8.6 (53.8–86) | 0.70 |
| Meniscus procedure (meniscectomy/repair/none) | 10/6/18 | 14/5/13 | 10/7/14 | 0.73 |
| Mediolateral size (mm) | 84±6 (71.3–97.0) | 84.5±7 (70.0–95.4) | 86±7 (68.0–95.5) | 0.49 |
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation (range). p<0.05 is statistically significant.
TG: tibial guide.
Fig. 2Schematic drawing showing the sagittal plane angle of the tibial guide (TG) at 40°, 45°, and 50°.
Fig. 3Intraoperative fluoroscopic image of a tibial guide set at 40° and 45°. Note that the guide tip is placed perpendicular to the joint surface as confirmed by fluoroscopy.
Fig. 4Measurement of tibial tunnel length (A) and aperture widening (B) during arthroscopy.
Fig. 5Arthroscopic image showing eccentric posterolateral re-reaming of the tibial tunnel causing widening of the aperture.
Comparative Results of Tibial Tunnel Length and Tunnel Aperture Widening
| Parameter | TG 40° | TG 45° | TG 50° | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Graft size (mm) | 7.1±0.3 | 7.2±0.5 | 7.3±0.5 | 0.43 |
| Tibial tunnel length (mm) | 38.8±3.1 (34–43) | 40.1±2.8 (34–45) | 42.0±2.8 (34–47) | 0.03 |
| Tibial tunnel widening (mm) | 2.24±1.3 (1–8) | 2.78±1.8 (1–8) | 3.36±1.4 (1–8) | 0.01 |
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation (range). p<0.05 is statistically significant.
TG: tibial guide.
Comparison of Preoperative and 2-Year Postoperative Clinical Data among the TG 40°, 45°, and 50° Groups
| Parameter | TG 40° | TG 45° | TG 50° | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Preop | 2-yr F/U | Preop | 2-yr F/U | Preop | 2-yr F/U | |
| No. of patients | 34 | 32 | 31 | |||
| Lysholm score | 61.2±9.8 | 93.3±3.5 | 58.3±8.5 | 90.2±8.3 | 59.5±10.4 | 92.8±5.5 |
| IKDC score | 40.6±6.3 | 77.9±6.5 | 38.8±4.7 | 76.3±6.1 | 41.9±5.7 | 76.1±5.6 |
| KT-2000 (side-to-side difference) | 8.2±2.6 | 1.7±1.5 | 7.8±1.8 | 1.5±1.2 | 8.5±2.2 | 1.8±1.4 |
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.
TG: tibial guide, Preop: preoperative, F/U: follow-up, IKDC: International Knee Documentation Committee.
Fig. 6Measurement of the tibial aperture using an arthroscopic ruler (A, C) and three-dimensional computed tomography (B, D).