BACKGROUND: Matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) may serve as a biomarker of ventricular remodeling in selected populations, but few studies have assessed its performance in clinical practice. We tested MMP-9 as a biomarker of remodeling and predictor of outcomes in a systolic heart failure cohort derived from clinical practice and compared its performance to brain natriuretic peptide (BNP). METHODS: Plasma MMP-9 and BNP levels were measured in 395 outpatients with systolic heart failure who participated in the Penn Heart Failure Study. We tested for (1) cross-sectional associations between biomarker levels, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension index (LVEDDI), and ejection fraction (EF), and (2) associations between baseline biomarker levels and risk of subsequent cardiac hospitalization or death over 3 years of follow-up. RESULTS: Matrix metalloproteinase 9 had no significant correlation with LVEDDI (rho = 0.04, P = not significant) or EF (rho = -0.06, P = not significant), whereas BNP showed highly significant correlations (LVEDDI: rho = -0.27, P < .0001; EF: rho = -0.35, P < .0001). In multivariate linear regression models, MMP-9 again showed no significant associations with LVEDDI (P = .6) or EF (P = .14), whereas BNP showed strong independent associations (LVEDDI: P < .001; EF: P = .002). Kaplan-Meier analyses showed no difference in hospital-free survival by baseline MMP-9 tertile (P = .7), whereas higher BNP tertile predicted worse survival (P < .0001). In multivariate Cox models, baseline MMP-9 level did not predict risk of adverse outcome (hazard ratio for log increase 0.98, P = .9), whereas BNP was a significant independent predictor (hazard ratio for log increase 1.15, P = .02). CONCLUSION: Compared to BNP, MMP-9 is a poor clinical biomarker of remodeling and outcome in patients with systolic heart failure derived from clinical practice.
BACKGROUND:Matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) may serve as a biomarker of ventricular remodeling in selected populations, but few studies have assessed its performance in clinical practice. We tested MMP-9 as a biomarker of remodeling and predictor of outcomes in a systolic heart failure cohort derived from clinical practice and compared its performance to brain natriuretic peptide (BNP). METHODS: Plasma MMP-9 and BNP levels were measured in 395 outpatients with systolic heart failure who participated in the Penn Heart Failure Study. We tested for (1) cross-sectional associations between biomarker levels, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension index (LVEDDI), and ejection fraction (EF), and (2) associations between baseline biomarker levels and risk of subsequent cardiac hospitalization or death over 3 years of follow-up. RESULTS:Matrix metalloproteinase 9 had no significant correlation with LVEDDI (rho = 0.04, P = not significant) or EF (rho = -0.06, P = not significant), whereas BNP showed highly significant correlations (LVEDDI: rho = -0.27, P < .0001; EF: rho = -0.35, P < .0001). In multivariate linear regression models, MMP-9 again showed no significant associations with LVEDDI (P = .6) or EF (P = .14), whereas BNP showed strong independent associations (LVEDDI: P < .001; EF: P = .002). Kaplan-Meier analyses showed no difference in hospital-free survival by baseline MMP-9 tertile (P = .7), whereas higher BNP tertile predicted worse survival (P < .0001). In multivariate Cox models, baseline MMP-9 level did not predict risk of adverse outcome (hazard ratio for log increase 0.98, P = .9), whereas BNP was a significant independent predictor (hazard ratio for log increase 1.15, P = .02). CONCLUSION: Compared to BNP, MMP-9 is a poor clinical biomarker of remodeling and outcome in patients with systolic heart failure derived from clinical practice.
Authors: Esther E J M Creemers; Jeniffer N Davis; Andrea M Parkhurst; Peter Leenders; Kathryn B Dowdy; Elizabeth Hapke; Anne M Hauet; Patricia G Escobar; Jack P M Cleutjens; Jos F M Smits; Mat J A P Daemen; Michael R Zile; Francis G Spinale Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2002-09-26 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Mary K King; Mytsi L Coker; Aaron Goldberg; James H McElmurray; Himali R Gunasinghe; Rupak Mukherjee; Michael R Zile; Timothy P O'Neill; Francis G Spinale Journal: Circ Res Date: 2003-02-07 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Paul W M Fedak; David S Smookler; Zamaneh Kassiri; Nobuhisa Ohno; Kevin J Leco; Subodh Verma; Donald A G Mickle; Katrina L Watson; Carlo V Hojilla; William Cruz; Richard D Weisel; Ren-Ke Li; Rama Khokha Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-07-19 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Johan Sundström; Jane C Evans; Emelia J Benjamin; Daniel Levy; Martin G Larson; Douglas B Sawyer; Deborah A Siwik; Wilson S Colucci; Patrice Sutherland; Peter W F Wilson; Ramachandran S Vasan Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-06-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Eric M Wilson; Himali R Gunasinghe; Mytsi L Coker; Philip Sprunger; Dorellyn Lee-Jackson; Biykem Bozkurt; Anita Deswal; Douglas L Mann; Francis G Spinale Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 5.712
Authors: Navaid Iqbal; Bailey Wentworth; Rajiv Choudhary; Alejandro De La Parra Landa; Benjamin Kipper; Arrash Fard; Alan S Maisel Journal: Cardiovasc Diagn Ther Date: 2012-06
Authors: Michael R Zile; Stacia M Desantis; Catalin F Baicu; Robert E Stroud; Sheila B Thompson; Catherine D McClure; Shannon M Mehurg; Francis G Spinale Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2011-02-24 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Bonnie Ky; Benjamin French; Kristin McCloskey; J Eduardo Rame; Erin McIntosh; Puja Shahi; Daniel L Dries; W H Wilson Tang; Alan H B Wu; James C Fang; Rebecca Boxer; Nancy K Sweitzer; Wayne C Levy; Lee R Goldberg; Mariell Jessup; Thomas P Cappola Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2010-12-22 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Bonnie Ky; Stephen E Kimmel; Radwan N Safa; Mary E Putt; Nancy K Sweitzer; James C Fang; Douglas B Sawyer; Thomas P Cappola Journal: Circulation Date: 2009-07-13 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Bonnie Ky; Benjamin French; Abigail May Khan; Ted Plappert; Andrew Wang; Julio A Chirinos; James C Fang; Nancy K Sweitzer; Barry A Borlaug; David A Kass; Martin St John Sutton; Thomas P Cappola Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-06-13 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Daniel L Dries; Bonnie Ky; Alan H B Wu; J Eduardo Rame; Mary E Putt; Thomas P Cappola Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2010-01-27 Impact factor: 8.790