OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare the physiological determinants of ejection fraction (EF)-ventricular size, contractile function, and ventricular-arterial (VA) interaction-and their associations with clinical outcomes in chronic heart failure (HF). BACKGROUND: EF is a potent predictor of HF outcomes, but represents a complex summary measure that integrates several components including left ventricular size, contractile function, and VA coupling. The relative importance of each of these parameters in determining prognosis is unknown. METHODS: In 466 participants with chronic systolic HF, we derived quantitative echocardiographic measures of EF: cardiac size (end-diastolic volume [EDV]); contractile function (the end-systolic pressure volume relationship slope [Eessb] and intercept [V0]); and VA coupling (arterial elastance [Ea]/Eessb). We determined the association between these parameters and the following adverse outcomes: 1) the combined endpoint of death, cardiac transplantation, or ventricular assist device (VAD) placement; and 2) cardiac hospitalization. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 3.4 years, there were 76 deaths, 52 transplantations, 14 VAD placements, and 684 cardiac hospitalizations. EF was independently associated with death, transplantation, and VAD placement (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 3.0; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8 to 5.0 comparing third and first tertiles), as were EDV (HR: 2.6; 95% CI: 1.5 to 4.2); V0 (HR: 3.6; 95% CI: 2.1 to 6.1); and Ea/Eessb (HR: 2.1; 95% CI: 1.3 to 3.3). EDV, V0, and Ea/Eessb were also associated with risk of cardiac hospitalization. Eessb was not significantly associated with any adverse outcomes in adjusted analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Left ventricular size, V0, and VA coupling are associated with prognosis in systolic HF, but end-systolic elastance (Eessb) is not. Assessment of VA coupling via Ea/Eessb is an additional noninvasively derived metric that can be used to gauge prognosis in human HF.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare the physiological determinants of ejection fraction (EF)-ventricular size, contractile function, and ventricular-arterial (VA) interaction-and their associations with clinical outcomes in chronic heart failure (HF). BACKGROUND: EF is a potent predictor of HF outcomes, but represents a complex summary measure that integrates several components including left ventricular size, contractile function, and VA coupling. The relative importance of each of these parameters in determining prognosis is unknown. METHODS: In 466 participants with chronic systolic HF, we derived quantitative echocardiographic measures of EF: cardiac size (end-diastolic volume [EDV]); contractile function (the end-systolic pressure volume relationship slope [Eessb] and intercept [V0]); and VA coupling (arterial elastance [Ea]/Eessb). We determined the association between these parameters and the following adverse outcomes: 1) the combined endpoint of death, cardiac transplantation, or ventricular assist device (VAD) placement; and 2) cardiac hospitalization. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 3.4 years, there were 76 deaths, 52 transplantations, 14 VAD placements, and 684 cardiac hospitalizations. EF was independently associated with death, transplantation, and VAD placement (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 3.0; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8 to 5.0 comparing third and first tertiles), as were EDV (HR: 2.6; 95% CI: 1.5 to 4.2); V0 (HR: 3.6; 95% CI: 2.1 to 6.1); and Ea/Eessb (HR: 2.1; 95% CI: 1.3 to 3.3). EDV, V0, and Ea/Eessb were also associated with risk of cardiac hospitalization. Eessb was not significantly associated with any adverse outcomes in adjusted analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Left ventricular size, V0, and VA coupling are associated with prognosis in systolic HF, but end-systolic elastance (Eessb) is not. Assessment of VA coupling via Ea/Eessb is an additional noninvasively derived metric that can be used to gauge prognosis in human HF.
Authors: Roberto M Lang; Michelle Bierig; Richard B Devereux; Frank A Flachskampf; Elyse Foster; Patricia A Pellikka; Michael H Picard; Mary J Roman; James Seward; Jack S Shanewise; Scott D Solomon; Kirk T Spencer; Martin St John Sutton; William J Stewart Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Margaret M Redfield; Steven J Jacobsen; Barry A Borlaug; Richard J Rodeheffer; David A Kass Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-10-03 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Bonnie Ky; Benjamin French; Kristin McCloskey; J Eduardo Rame; Erin McIntosh; Puja Shahi; Daniel L Dries; W H Wilson Tang; Alan H B Wu; James C Fang; Rebecca Boxer; Nancy K Sweitzer; Wayne C Levy; Lee R Goldberg; Mariell Jessup; Thomas P Cappola Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2010-12-22 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Bonnie Ky; Stephen E Kimmel; Radwan N Safa; Mary E Putt; Nancy K Sweitzer; James C Fang; Douglas B Sawyer; Thomas P Cappola Journal: Circulation Date: 2009-07-13 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Barry A Borlaug; Carolyn S P Lam; Véronique L Roger; Richard J Rodeheffer; Margaret M Redfield Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-07-28 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: M D Feldman; P H Pak; C C Wu; H L Haber; C M Heesch; J D Bergin; E R Powers; T D Cowart; W Johnson; A M Feldman; D A Kass Journal: Circulation Date: 1996-02-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Michal Schäfer; Cynthia Myers; R Dale Brown; Maria G Frid; Wei Tan; Kendall Hunter; Kurt R Stenmark Journal: Curr Hypertens Rep Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 5.369
Authors: Chike C Nwabuo; Henrique T Moreira; Henrique D Vasconcellos; Bharath Ambale-Venkatesh; Kihei Yoneyama; Yoshiaki Ohyama; Ravi K Sharma; Anderson C Armstrong; Mohammed R Ostovaneh; Cora E Lewis; Kiang Liu; Pamela J Schreiner; Kofo O Ogunyankin; Samuel S Gidding; João A C Lima Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2017-09-15 Impact factor: 5.251