| Literature DB >> 18509504 |
Seth Duncan1, Lisa Feldman Barrett.
Abstract
In this paper, we suggest that affect meets the traditional definition of "cognition" such that the affect-cognition distinction is phenomenological, rather than ontological. We review how the affect-cognition distinction is not respected in the human brain, and discuss the neural mechanisms by which affect influences sensory processing. As a result of this sensory modulation, affect performs several basic "cognitive" functions. Affect appears to be necessary for normal conscious experience, language fluency, and memory. Finally, we suggest that understanding the differences between affect and cognition will require systematic study of how the phenomenological distinction characterising the two comes about, and why such a distinction is functional.Entities:
Year: 2007 PMID: 18509504 PMCID: PMC2396787 DOI: 10.1080/02699930701437931
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cogn Emot ISSN: 0269-9931