OBJECTIVES: Affect and loneliness are important indicators of mental health and well-being in older adulthood and are linked to significant outcomes including physical health and mortality. Given a large focus on young-old adults within gerontological research, the primary aim of this study was to examine the ability of individual and social resources in predicting affect and loneliness within a sample of oldest-old individuals including centenarians, an understudied population. METHODS: Participants were assessed during the most recent cross-sectional data collection of the Georgia Centenarian Study. The eligible sample included 55 octogenarians (M = 83.70 years, SD = 2.68; range = 81-90) and 77 centenarians (M = 99.78 years, SD = 1.64; range = 98-109). Subjects scored 17 or greater on the Mini-Mental Status Exam and completed mental health assessments. RESULTS: Hierarchical regression analyses were conducted to examine the relation of affect and loneliness with demographic characteristics, physical and social functioning, cognition, and personality. Within this sample of cognitively intact oldest old, measures of executive control and cognitive functioning demonstrated limited association with mental health. Personality, specifically neuroticism, was strongly related to mental health indicators for both age groups and social relations were particularly important associates of centenarians' mental health. DISCUSSION: Findings indicate the distinctiveness of mental health indicators and the need to distinguish differential roles of individual and social resources in determining these outcomes among octogenarians and centenarians.
OBJECTIVES: Affect and loneliness are important indicators of mental health and well-being in older adulthood and are linked to significant outcomes including physical health and mortality. Given a large focus on young-old adults within gerontological research, the primary aim of this study was to examine the ability of individual and social resources in predicting affect and loneliness within a sample of oldest-old individuals including centenarians, an understudied population. METHODS:Participants were assessed during the most recent cross-sectional data collection of the Georgia Centenarian Study. The eligible sample included 55 octogenarians (M = 83.70 years, SD = 2.68; range = 81-90) and 77 centenarians (M = 99.78 years, SD = 1.64; range = 98-109). Subjects scored 17 or greater on the Mini-Mental Status Exam and completed mental health assessments. RESULTS: Hierarchical regression analyses were conducted to examine the relation of affect and loneliness with demographic characteristics, physical and social functioning, cognition, and personality. Within this sample of cognitively intact oldest old, measures of executive control and cognitive functioning demonstrated limited association with mental health. Personality, specifically neuroticism, was strongly related to mental health indicators for both age groups and social relations were particularly important associates of centenarians' mental health. DISCUSSION: Findings indicate the distinctiveness of mental health indicators and the need to distinguish differential roles of individual and social resources in determining these outcomes among octogenarians and centenarians.
Authors: Edwin de Beurs; Hannie Comijs; Jos W R Twisk; Caroline Sonnenberg; Aartjan T F Beekman; Dorly Deeg Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Tina L Harralson; Tracela M White; Alan C Regenberg; Michael J Kallan; Tom Ten Have; Patricia A Parmelee; Jerry C Johnson Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2002 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Takeshi Nakagawa; Jinmyoung Cho; Yasuyuki Gondo; Peter Martin; Mary Ann Johnson; Leonard W Poon; Nobuyoshi Hirose Journal: Aging Ment Health Date: 2017-07-06 Impact factor: 3.658
Authors: Eliza J Davidson; Charles T Taylor; Catherine R Ayers; Natalie E Quach; Xin M Tu; Ellen E Lee Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2021-11-12 Impact factor: 7.996
Authors: Daniele Zaccaria; Stefano Cavalli; Barbara Masotti; Carla Gomes Da Rocha; Armin von Gunten; Daniela S Jopp Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-05-13 Impact factor: 4.614