Literature DB >> 18508972

The evolution of imperfect floral mimicry.

Nicolas J Vereecken1, Florian P Schiestl.   

Abstract

The theory of mimicry predicts that selection favors signal refinement in mimics to optimally match the signals released by their specific model species. We provide here chemical and behavioral evidence that a sexually deceptive orchid benefits from its mimetic imperfection to its co-occurring and specific bee model by triggering a stronger response in male bees, which react more intensively to the similar, but novel, scent stimulus provided by the orchid.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2008        PMID： 18508972      PMCID： PMC2396721          DOI： 10.1073/pnas.0800194105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN： 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  11 in total

1.  Floral mimicry: a fascinating yet poorly understood phenomenon.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 18.313

2.  Does selection on floral odor promote differentiation among populations and species of the sexually deceptive orchid genus Ophrys?

Authors:  Jim Mant; Rod Peakall; Florian P Schiestl
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Context-dependent discrimination and the evolution of mimicry.

Authors:  Øistein Haugsten Holen; Rufus A Johnstone
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2006-01-09       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 4.  On the success of a swindle: pollination by deception in orchids.

Authors:  Florian P Schiestl
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2005-06

Review 5.  Biases in signal evolution: learning makes a difference.

Authors:  Carel ten Cate; Candy Rowe
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  The key mimetic features of hoverflies through avian eyes.

Authors:  Roderick S Bain; Arash Rashed; Verity J Cowper; Francis S Gilbert; Thomas N Sherratt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Sexual selection, receiver biases, and the evolution of sex differences.

Authors:  M J Ryan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-09-25       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection.

Authors:  J A Endler; A L Basolo
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 17.712

9.  Peak shift discrimination learning as a mechanism of signal evolution.

Authors:  Spencer K Lynn; Jonathan Cnaani; Daniel R Papaj
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Cuticular hydrocarbons as sex pheromone of the bee Colletes cunicularius and the key to its mimicry by the sexually deceptive orchid, Ophrys exaltata.

Authors:  Jim Mant; Christoph Brändli; Nicolas J Vereecken; Claudia M Schulz; Wittko Francke; Florian P Schiestl
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.626
View more
  19 in total

1.  A comparative analysis of the evolution of imperfect mimicry.

Authors:  Heather D Penney; Christopher Hassall; Jeffrey H Skevington; Kevin R Abbott; Thomas N Sherratt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  The origin and dynamic evolution of chemical information transfer.

Authors:  Sandra Steiger; Thomas Schmitt; H Martin Schaefer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Floral scent in a sexually deceptive Ophrys orchid: from headspace collections to solvent extractions.

Authors:  Pietro Zito; Sergio Rosselli; Maurizio Bruno; Antonella Maggio; Maurizio Sajeva
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2018-12-03

4.  Nectar Attracts Foraging Honey Bees with Components of Their Queen Pheromones.

Authors:  Fanglin Liu; Jie Gao; Nayan Di; Lynn S Adler
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Pre-adaptations and the evolution of pollination by sexual deception: Cope's rule of specialization revisited.

Authors:  Nicolas J Vereecken; Carol A Wilson; Susann Hötling; Stefan Schulz; Sergey A Banketov; Patrick Mardulyn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Understanding intraspecific variation of floral scent in light of evolutionary ecology.

Authors:  Roxane Delle-Vedove; Bertrand Schatz; Mathilde Dufay
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  Sexual Deception in the Eucera-Pollinated Ophrys leochroma: A Chemical Intermediate between Wasp- and Andrena-Pollinated Species.

Authors:  Monica Cuervo; Demetra Rakosy; Carlos Martel; Stefan Schulz; Manfred Ayasse
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Hybrid floral scent novelty drives pollinator shift in sexually deceptive orchids.

Authors:  Nicolas J Vereecken; Salvatore Cozzolino; Florian P Schiestl
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  On the roles of colour and scent in a specialized floral mimicry system.

Authors:  Nicolas J Vereecken; Florian P Schiestl
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 4.357

10.  A pollinators' eye view of a shelter mimicry system.

Authors:  Nicolas J Vereecken; Achik Dorchin; Amots Dafni; Susann Hötling; Stefan Schulz; Stella Watts
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 4.357
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.