Literature DB >> 16673346

Context-dependent discrimination and the evolution of mimicry.

Øistein Haugsten Holen1, Rufus A Johnstone.   

Abstract

Many mimetic organisms have evolved a close resemblance to their models, making it difficult to discriminate between them on the basis of appearance alone. However, if mimics and models differ slightly in their activity patterns, behavior, or use of microhabitats, the exact circumstances under which a signaler is encountered may provide additional clues to its identity. We employ an optimality model of mimetic discrimination in which signal receivers obtain information about the relative risk of encountering mimics and models by observing an external background cue and flexibly adjust their response thresholds. Although such flexibility on the part of signal receivers has been predicted by theory and is supported by empirical evidence in a range of biological settings, little is known about the effects it has on signalers. We show that the presence of external cues that partly reveal signaler identity may benefit models and harm mimics, harm both, or even benefit both, depending on ecological circumstances. Moreover, if mimetic traits are costly to express, or mimics are related to their neighbors, context-dependent discrimination can dramatically alter the outcome of mimetic evolution. We discuss context-dependent discrimination among signal receivers in relation to small-scale synchrony in model and mimic activity patterns.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16673346     DOI: 10.1086/499567

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  8 in total

1.  Preys' exploitation of predators' fear: when the caterpillar plays the Gruffalo.

Authors:  Sergio Castellano; Paolo Cermelli
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The evolution of imperfect floral mimicry.

Authors:  Nicolas J Vereecken; Florian P Schiestl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Reciprocal mimicry: kin selection can drive defended prey to resemble their Batesian mimics.

Authors:  Øistein Haugsten Holen; Rufus A Johnstone
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Disentangling taste and toxicity in aposematic prey.

Authors:  Øistein Haugsten Holen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Signal detection and optimal acceptance thresholds in avian brood parasite-host systems: implications for egg rejection.

Authors:  Francisco Ruiz-Raya; Manuel Soler
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  True recognition of nestlings by hosts selects for mimetic cuckoo chicks.

Authors:  Hee-Jin Noh; Ros Gloag; Naomi E Langmore
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Uncovering dangerous cheats: how do avian hosts recognize adult brood parasites?

Authors:  Alfréd Trnka; Pavol Prokop; Tomáš Grim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Molecular crypsis by pathogenic fungi using human factor H. A numerical model.

Authors:  Stefan N Lang; Sebastian Germerodt; Christina Glock; Christine Skerka; Peter F Zipfel; Stefan Schuster
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.