| Literature DB >> 18506187 |
K Ishikawa1, Y Kamohara, F Tanaka, N Haraguchi, K Mimori, H Inoue, M Mori.
Abstract
Mitotic centromere-associated kinesin (MCAK) is a microtubule depolymerase that is essential for proper kinetochore-microtubule attachment during spindle formation. Overexpression of MCAK has been correlated with aggressive forms of carcinoma, resulting in poor prognosis of colorectal cancer. The purpose of this study was to quantify MCAK expression in malignant and benign colorectal tissues and to determine if MCAK expression levels correlate with clinicopathologic factors and prognosis in colorectal cancer patients. Paired colorectal tissue samples from tumours and the corresponding normal tissues were obtained from 120 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent surgical resection. The real-time reverse transcriptase-PCR and immunohistochemistry were used to analyse mRNA and protein expression status with respect to various clinicopathological factors. MCAK expression was higher in colorectal cancer tissue (P<0.01) than in corresponding normal tissue, and this elevated expression level was markedly associated with factors such as lymph node metastasis (P=0.0023), venous invasion (P=0.019), peritoneal dissemination (P=0.021) and Dukes' classification (P=0.0023). Patients with high MCAK mRNA expression also showed a far poorer survival rate than those with low MCAK mRNA expression (P<0.01). Elevated MCAK expression was an independent predictor of overall survival and lymph node metastasis. These data suggest that MCAK expression may serve as a good marker of prognosis and lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18506187 PMCID: PMC2410130 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604379
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Figure 1MCAK mRNA expression in colorectal cancer cell lines and clinical tissue specimens. (A) Reverse transcriptase-PCR analysis of MCAK expression in human colorectal cancer cell lines. Twelve of the 13 cell lines (92%) expressed the MCAK gene, whereas COLO201 did not. (B) Reverse transcriptase-PCR analysis of MCAK expression in clinical samples of colorectal cancer. MCAK expression was determined in the colorectal tumours (T) and paired normal (N) samples obtained from seven patients. In all seven cases, MCAK expression was higher in the tumours than in the normal tissues. GAPDH was used as a loading control. m=marker; NC=negative control; PC=positive control.
Figure 2Immunohistochemical staining for MCAK in tumour specimens. (A and B) A representative positive stain for MCAK in tissue from a colorectal cancer patient. Positive staining is observed in the cytoplasm of cancer cells, but not in the stromal cells nor in normal epithelium. Solid line arrows indicate cancer cells that are positive for MCAK expression. (C and D) A representative negative stain for MCAK in a colorectal cancer specimen. Dotted line arrows indicate cancer cells that are negative for MCAK expression. Mitotic centromere-associated kinesin protein expression was evaluated in tumours and corresponding normal tissues from 15 representative colorectal cancer cases. The six tumours that were negative for protein expression (C and D) also exhibited lower mRNA expression levels, whereas seven of nine tumours with a positive immunohistochemical expression (A and B) displayed elevated mRNA expression levels. The expression of MCAK mRNA was thereby associated with protein expression. Each solid square in (A) and (C) was magnified × 100 and shown in (B) and (D), respectively (original magnification; (A) and (C), × 40; (B) and (D), × 100).
Clinicopathological factors and MCAK mRNA expression in 120 colorectal cancers
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (mean±s.d.) | 65.3±12.3 | 66.9±11.3 | 0.49 |
|
| |||
| Male | 22 (56.4) | 48 (59.3) | 0.76 |
| Female | 17 (43.6) | 33 (40.7) | |
|
| |||
| Well | 15 (38.5) | 29 (35.8) | 0.78 |
| Others (moderately, poorly and mucinous) | 24 (61.5) | 52 (64.2) | |
|
| |||
| <30 mm (small) | 8 (20.5) | 17 (21.0) | 0.95 |
| ⩾30 mm (large) | 31 (79.5) | 64 (79.0) | |
|
| |||
| Absent | 26 (66.7) | 59 (72.8) | 0.49 |
| Present | 13 (33.3) | 22 (27.2) | |
|
| |||
| Absent | 14 (35.9) | 53 (65.4) | 0.0023* |
| Present | 25 (64.1) | 28 (34.6) | |
|
| |||
| Absent | 22 (56.4) | 53 (65.4) | 0.34 |
| Present | 17 (43.6) | 28 (34.6) | |
|
| |||
| Absent | 26 (66.7) | 69 (85.2) | 0.019* |
| Present | 13 (33.3) | 12 (14.8) | |
|
| |||
| Absent | 33 (84.6) | 73 (90.1) | 0.38 |
| Present | 6 (15.4) | 8 (9.9) | |
|
| |||
| Absent | 35 (89.7) | 80 (98.8) | 0.021* |
| Present | 4 (10.3) | 1 (1.2) | |
|
| |||
| A and B | 13 (33.3) | 51 (63.0) | 0.0023* |
| C and D | 26 (66.7) | 30 (37.0) | |
s.d.=standard deviation.
*P<0.05.
Figure 3Kaplan–Meier survival curves of patients with colorectal cancer based on MCAK mRNA expression status. Patients in the high-expression group (bold line) showed significantly poorer prognosis than those in the low-expression group (dotted line; P<0.01, log rank test).
Univariate and multivariate analysis for overall survival (Cox proportional hazards regression model)
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Age (<60/60 ⩽) | 0.82 | 0.58–1.20 | 0.29 | — | — | — |
| Gender (male/female) | 0.96 | 0.68–1.33 | 0.81 | — | — | — |
| Histological grade (well/moderately, poorly and mucinous) | 1.21 | 0.86–1.76 | 0.29 | — | — | — |
| Tumour size (<30 mm/⩾30 mm) | 1.93 | 1.16–3.94 | 0.009 | 1.29 | 0.74–2.70 | 0.4 |
| Serosal invasion (absent/present) | 2.40 | 1.72–3.38 | <0.0001 | 2.16 | 1.52–3.12 | <0.0001 |
| Lymph node metastasis (absent/present) | 2.25 | 1.58–3.38 | <0.0001 | 1.82 | 1.26–2.76 | 0.0012 |
| Lymphatic invasion (absent/present) | 2.30 | 1.64–3.31 | <0.0001 | — | — | — |
| Venous invasion (absent/present) | 1.43 | 0.99–2.00 | 0.055 | — | — | — |
| 1.49 | 1.07–2.07 | 0.019 | 1.42 | 1.01–2.00 | 0.048 | |
CI=confidence interval; RR=relative risk.
Univariate and multivariate analysis for lymph node metastasis (logistic regression model)
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Age (<60/60 ⩽) | 0.44 | 0.18–1.108 | 0.08 | — | — | — |
| Gender (male/female) | 0.86 | 0.41–1.79 | 0.69 | — | — | — |
| Histological grade (well/moderately, poorly and mucinous) | 2.26 | 1.05–5.02 | 0.04 | 2.21 | 0.84–6.09 | 0.11 |
| Tumour size (<30 mm/⩾30 mm) | 4.08 | 1.51–13.1 | 0.01 | 2.52 | 0.72–10.1 | 0.17 |
| Tumour stage (T1/T2–T4) | 4.40 | 1.34–19.9 | 0.02 | 1.25 | 0.26–7.09 | 0.79 |
| Lymphatic invasion (absent/present) | 9.11 | 3.98–22.3 | <0.0001 | 7.67 | 3.01–21.1 | <0.0001 |
| Venous invasion (absent/present) | 4.41 | 1.56–8.25 | 0.003 | 2.01 | 0.66–6.48 | 0.23 |
| 3.38 | 1.54–7.67 | 0.003 | 4.02 | 1.53–11.3 | 0.006 | |
CI=confidence interval; RR=relative risk.