BACKGROUND: Bicuspid aortic valve is frequent and is reported to cause numerous complications, but the clinical outcome of patients diagnosed with normal or mildly dysfunctional valve is undefined. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 212 asymptomatic community residents from Olmsted County, Minn (age, 32+/-20 years; 65% male), bicuspid aortic valve was diagnosed between 1980 and 1999 with ejection fraction > or =50% and aortic regurgitation or stenosis, absent or mild. Aortic valve degeneration at diagnosis was scored echocardiographically for calcification, thickening, and mobility reduction (0 to 3 each), with scores ranging from 0 to 9. At diagnosis, ejection fraction was 63+/-5% and left ventricular diameter was 48+/-9 mm. Survival 20 years after diagnosis was 90+/-3%, identical to the general population (P=0.72). Twenty years after diagnosis, heart failure, new cardiac symptoms, and cardiovascular medical events occurred in 7+/-2%, 26+/-4%, and 33+/-5%, respectively. Twenty years after diagnosis, aortic valve surgery, ascending aortic surgery, or any cardiovascular surgery was required in 24+/-4%, 5+/-2%, and 27+/-4% at a younger age than the general population (P<0.0001). No aortic dissection occurred. Thus, cardiovascular medical or surgical events occurred in 42+/-5% 20 years after diagnosis. Independent predictors of cardiovascular events were age > or =50 years (risk ratio, 3.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.5 to 5.7; P<0.01) and valve degeneration at diagnosis (risk ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 4.5; P=0.016; >70% events at 20 years). Baseline ascending aorta > or =40 mm independently predicted surgery for aorta dilatation (risk ratio, 10.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.8 to 77.3; P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In the community, asymptomatic patients with bicuspid aortic valve and no or minimal hemodynamic abnormality enjoy excellent long-term survival but incur frequent cardiovascular events, particularly with progressive valve dysfunction. Echocardiographic valve degeneration at diagnosis separates higher-risk patients who require regular assessment from lower-risk patients who require only episodic follow-up.
BACKGROUND:Bicuspid aortic valve is frequent and is reported to cause numerous complications, but the clinical outcome of patients diagnosed with normal or mildly dysfunctional valve is undefined. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 212 asymptomatic community residents from Olmsted County, Minn (age, 32+/-20 years; 65% male), bicuspid aortic valve was diagnosed between 1980 and 1999 with ejection fraction > or =50% and aortic regurgitation or stenosis, absent or mild. Aortic valve degeneration at diagnosis was scored echocardiographically for calcification, thickening, and mobility reduction (0 to 3 each), with scores ranging from 0 to 9. At diagnosis, ejection fraction was 63+/-5% and left ventricular diameter was 48+/-9 mm. Survival 20 years after diagnosis was 90+/-3%, identical to the general population (P=0.72). Twenty years after diagnosis, heart failure, new cardiac symptoms, and cardiovascular medical events occurred in 7+/-2%, 26+/-4%, and 33+/-5%, respectively. Twenty years after diagnosis, aortic valve surgery, ascending aortic surgery, or any cardiovascular surgery was required in 24+/-4%, 5+/-2%, and 27+/-4% at a younger age than the general population (P<0.0001). No aortic dissection occurred. Thus, cardiovascular medical or surgical events occurred in 42+/-5% 20 years after diagnosis. Independent predictors of cardiovascular events were age > or =50 years (risk ratio, 3.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.5 to 5.7; P<0.01) and valve degeneration at diagnosis (risk ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 4.5; P=0.016; >70% events at 20 years). Baseline ascending aorta > or =40 mm independently predicted surgery for aorta dilatation (risk ratio, 10.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.8 to 77.3; P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In the community, asymptomatic patients with bicuspid aortic valve and no or minimal hemodynamic abnormality enjoy excellent long-term survival but incur frequent cardiovascular events, particularly with progressive valve dysfunction. Echocardiographic valve degeneration at diagnosis separates higher-risk patients who require regular assessment from lower-risk patients who require only episodic follow-up.
Authors: Robert O Bonow; Blase A Carabello; Chatterjee Kanu; Antonio C de Leon; David P Faxon; Michael D Freed; William H Gaasch; Bruce Whitney Lytle; Rick A Nishimura; Patrick T O'Gara; Robert A O'Rourke; Catherine M Otto; Pravin M Shah; Jack S Shanewise; Sidney C Smith; Alice K Jacobs; Cynthia D Adams; Jeffrey L Anderson; Elliott M Antman; David P Faxon; Valentin Fuster; Jonathan L Halperin; Loren F Hiratzka; Sharon A Hunt; Bruce W Lytle; Rick Nishimura; Richard L Page; Barbara Riegel Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-08-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: David Messika-Zeitoun; Lawrence F Bielak; Patricia A Peyser; Patrick F Sheedy; Stephen T Turner; Vuyisile T Nkomo; Jerome F Breen; Joseph Maalouf; Christopher Scott; A Jamil Tajik; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2006-12-21 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Vuyisile T Nkomo; Julius M Gardin; Thomas N Skelton; John S Gottdiener; Christopher G Scott; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano Journal: Lancet Date: 2006-09-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Ratnasari Padang; Paul G Bannon; Richmond Jeremy; David R Richmond; Christopher Semsarian; Michael Vallely; Michael Wilson; Tristan D Yan Journal: Ann Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2013-01
Authors: Marco Russo; Guglielmo Saitto; Paolo Nardi; Fabio Bertoldo; Carlo Bassano; Antonio Scafuri; Antonio Pellegrino; Giovanni Ruvolo Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 2.895