| Literature DB >> 18505592 |
Anat Zvi1, Naomi Ariel, John Fulkerson, Jerald C Sadoff, Avigdor Shafferman.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the causative agent of tuberculosis (TB), infects approximately 8 million annually culminating in approximately 2 million deaths. Moreover, about one third of the population is latently infected, 10% of which develop disease during lifetime. Current approved prophylactic TB vaccines (BCG and derivatives thereof) are of variable efficiency in adult protection against pulmonary TB (0%-80%), and directed essentially against early phase infection.Entities:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18505592 PMCID: PMC2442614 DOI: 10.1186/1755-8794-1-18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Genomics ISSN: 1755-8794 Impact factor: 3.063
Figure 1Flowchart of the selection procedure – data mining and bioinformatic analyses. A schematic presentation of the reductive approach applied for the whole-genome selection of Mtb vaccine candidates.
Information sources for the knowledge dataset used in this study.
| Sassetti | Genes essential for growth (in strains H37Rv & BCG) (TraSH, microarray) | ||
| Rengarajan | Genes necessary for survival in macrophages (TraSH, microarray) | ||
| Stewart | Screening of mutants unable to inhibit phagosome acidification (STM, microarray analysis) | ||
| Rosas-Magallanes | Screening of mutants attenuated in human macrophages (STM) | ||
| Monahan | |||
| Fisher | Genes induced following | ||
| Schnappinger | Differential transcriptome of genes in the phagosome, in comparison to their expression in culture (microarray, RT-PCR) | ||
| Talaat | Comparison of H37Rv expression profile between growth in lungs of BALB/c vs. macrophages (microarray, RT-PCR) | ||
| Cappelli | Comparison of H37Rv gene expression in human macrophages vs. synthetic medium (microarray, RT-PCR) | ||
| He | Genes upregulated by MprA (in SDS treated culture); (microarray RT-PCR) | ||
| Voskuil | Expression profile at low O2 and low concentrations of NO (inhibitor of aerobic respiration); dormancy regulated gene set; mostly overlaps with Sherman; microarray | ||
| Sherman | H37Rv gene expression under hypoxia (from ambient to 0.2% O2 for 2 h) | ||
| Schnappinger et al., 2003 | Analysis of mutants deficient in NO synthase | ||
| Talaat | Difference in expression in BALB/c vs. broth after incubation with dexamethasone (microarray) | ||
| Tufariello | Effect of rpf deletions on persistence and reactivation in mouse | ||
| Voskuil | Expression profile at low O2 and low concentrations of NO; dormancy regulated gene set; mostly overlaps with Sherman; microarray | ||
| Voskuil | Transcription profile in non-proliferating conditions; genes induced under oxygen-depleted conditions (nrp-non-replicating persistence) | ||
| Starck | Proteome comparison of aerobic and anerobic conditions (MTB Harlingen strain) | ||
| Fenhalls | Expression of genes in human tuberculous granulomas (in situ hybridization) | ||
| Shi | Transcription pattern of 6 H37Rv genes in mouse lungs (RT-PCR) | ||
| Shi | Transcription pattern of H37Rv major secreted antigens in mouse lungs (RT-PCR) | ||
| Dubnau | Expression of genes during infection in mouse lungs vs. medium (promoter trap) | ||
| Rachman | Identification of genes expressed during pulmonary TB; transcription profile from clinical lung samples (granuloma vs. | ||
| Tufariello | rpf gene expression in the lungs of infected mice | ||
| Lamichhane | Genes required for in vivo survival im mouse lungs (microarray screening of transposon mutants) | ||
| Jain | Mutants tested for lung implantation in survival in guinea pigs and mouse aerosol models | ||
| Florczyk | Identification of a 18-bp palindromic sequence motif | ||
| Gomez | |||
| Brusasca | Antibody response to 6 H37Rv RD1 proteins in guinea pigs and sera from pulmonary TB patients | ||
| Yeremeev | Elicitation of B-cell response in mice immunized with rpf proteins (H37Rv) | ||
| Weldingh | Seropotential of 35 proteins, tested by response with sera of TB patients | ||
| Amor | Seroreactivity of MTB specific proteins previously predicted as secreted | ||
| Cockle et al., 2002 | Immune response in cattle against 13 ORFs (RD1, RD2 and RD14 antigens). | ||
| Vekemans | Profile of immune response in healthy and TB patients against a series of mycobacterial antigens | ||
| Mustafa | Characterization of Th1 cell reactivity with RD1 antigens and peptides | ||
| Rodriguez | Identification of genes induced by iron and by the iron-dependent regulator IdeR – comparison of H37Rv and ideR-mutant strains (microarray) | ||
| Mollenkopf | DNA vaccine candidates preselected by comparative proteomics (present in MTB, absent from BCG) evaluated for their protective potential (aerosol challenge of H37Rv, mice) | ||
| Vipond | DNA vaccine candidates chosen by supporting data, such as virulence-associated, level of expression, growth in various conditions etc. (aerosol challenge of H37Rv, guinea pigs) | ||
| Roupie | DNA vaccine candidates chosen from the DosR regulon (on the basis of strong T-cell responses in infected humans), evaluated for their immunogenicity potential (mice immunizations). | ||
| Assignment of ORF products as membrane-attached, by: | |||
| (1) Prediction of membrane-spanning regions by TMpred | |||
| (2) Inference from annotation and/or domain analysis | |||
| Inference from annotation and/or domain analysis | |||
| Compilation of experimental and predicted data from: | |||
| (1) Screening of the public repository database of immune epitope data (IEDB) | |||
| (2) Particular experimental evidences from the literature | |||
| (3) Literature-derived predicted T-cell epitopes | |||
| (4) Prediction of CTL epitopes by an integrative approach (NetCTL) | |||
Numerical internal scores.
| Macrophage | (0) no evidence | |
| (1) significant evidence from one source | ||
| (2) significant evidence from two sources | ||
| (3) significant evidence from > two sources + high value | ||
| MprAB | (0) no evidence | |
| (1) <3.0 fold expression | ||
| (2) >3.0 fold expression | ||
| Hypoxia | (0) no evidence | |
| (1) 1 evidence | ||
| (2) >1 evidence, high values | ||
| Reactivation | (0) no evidence | |
| (1) evidence from one source | ||
| (2) evidence from two sources | ||
| Dormancy | (0) no evidence | |
| (1) low values | ||
| (2) high values | ||
| Lung | (0) no evidence | |
| (1) evidence from one source | ||
| (2) multiple evidences (or Rachman/Jain source) | ||
| (0) no evidence | ||
| (2) up regulated | ||
| Secreted | (0) no evidence | |
| (1) secreted | ||
| (2) secreted+virulence-related function | ||
| B-cell immunogen | (0) no evidence | |
| (1) evidence from one source | ||
| (2) multiple evidences | ||
| Iron regulated | (0) no evidence | |
| (1) low values | ||
| (2) high values | ||
| Cell wall | (0) not related | |
| (1) general association (without tm) | ||
| (2) virulence-related function | ||
| Vaccine | (0) no evidence | |
| (1) DNA/protein immunization, immune respone but no protection | ||
| (2) part of a multivalent construct, protection | ||
| (3) DNA/protein vaccine protection | ||
| Repeats | (0) no repeats | |
| (1) repeats only | ||
| (2) repeats + virulence-related function | ||
| T-cell | ||
| Experimental | (0) no evidence | |
| (1) evidence from one source | ||
| (2) multiple different evidences | ||
| Predictions | (0) 0< #supertypes <6 | |
| (1) 6 < #supertypes <10 | ||
| (2) 10<#supertypes <12 | ||
Top-ranking 45 antigens (sorted by quantitative and qualitative scores).
| 94 | hypothetical protein | 9 | 14 | |||
| 172 | probable resuscitation-promoting factor rpfE [transglycosylase] | 9 | 14 | |||
| 297 | hypothetical protein TB31.7 [universal stress protein] | 9 | 14 | |||
| 362 | possible resuscitation-promoting factor rpfB [transglycosylase, C5 adhesion domain] | 9 | 13 | |||
| 407 | possible conserved trans-membrane protein [transglycosylase, rpfA] | 9 | 12 | |||
| acr (α-crystallin) | 144 | heat-shock protein HspX (alpha-crystallin homolog) 14 kDa antigen Hsp16.3 | 8 | 14 | ||
| 325 | secreted antigen 85-B FBPB (85-B) (mycolyl-transferase 85B) | 8 | 14 | |||
| 96 | Low Mw protein antigen 7 esxH (10 kDa antigen) CFP-7, TB10.4) | 8 | 13 | |||
| acg | 331 | conserved hypothetical protein Acg [nitroreductase] | 8 | 13 | ||
| 143 | hypothetical protein [CBS pair – binding/regulation, euk] | 8 | 13 | |||
| 368 | PPE family protein [PPE68, RD1 T/B immunogen] | 8 | 13 | |||
| 295 | hypothetical protein [USP-like] | 8 | 12 | |||
| 344 | hypothetical protein [possible nitroreductase] | 8 | 12 | |||
| 210 | probable conserved trans-membrane protein | 8 | 11 | |||
| 317 | hypothetical protein [USP] | 8 | 10 | |||
| 154 | probable resuscitation-promoting factor rpfD [transglycosylase] | 8 | 10 | |||
| 396 | elongation factor Tu [iron-regulated] | 8 | 9 | |||
| 120 | hypothetical protein | 8 | 9 | |||
| 228 | immunogenic protein MPT64 | 7 | 13 | |||
| 338 | secreted antigen 85-A FBPA (85-A) (mycolyl-transferase 85A) | 7 | 13 | |||
| 273 | hypothetical protein | 7 | 11 | |||
| [ | 463 | hypothetical protein [diacylglycerol acyltransferase] | 7 | 11 | ||
| [ | 332 | hypothetical protein [possible nitroreductase NfnB] | 7 | 11 | ||
| 389 | probable acyl [-acyl-carrier-desaturase desA1] | 7 | 10 | |||
| 740 | catalase-peroxidase-peroxinitritase-T katG | 7 | 10 | |||
| [ | 110 | Low Mw T-cell antigen TB8.4 [secretion antigen SA5K] | 7 | 9 | ||
| [ | 579 | probable drugs transport ATP-binding protein ABC transporter [ATM1 ABC siderophore-iron transporter] | 7 | 9 | ||
| 143 | hypothetical protein | 7 | 9 | |||
| 1327 | probable trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatase OTSB1 | 7 | 9 | |||
| 339 | possible phosphofructokinase (pfkB) | 7 | 9 | |||
| 413 | hypothetical protein | 7 | 9 | |||
| 371 | secreted L-alanine dehydrogenase ald (40 kDa antigen, TB43) | 7 | 9 | |||
| 176 | probable resuscitation-promoting factor rpfC [transglycosylase] | 7 | 8 | |||
| 141 | probable conserved transmembrane protein | 7 | 8 | |||
| 270 | conserved 35 kDa Alanine-rich protein [phage-shock protein IM30] | 7 | 8 | |||
| 95 | 6 kDA early secretory antigenic target ESXA (ESAT-6) | 6 | 11 | |||
| 159 | immunogenic protein MPT63 (16 kDa immunoprotective extracellular protein) | 6 | 10 | |||
| 681 | hypothetical protein [putative esterase/transferase] | 6 | 10 | |||
| 578 | two component sensor histidine kinase DEVS | 6 | 10 | |||
| 3157 | PPE family protein (PE55) [8 copies pentapeptide repeats] | 6 | 10 | |||
| 428 | isocitrate lyase(icl) [AceA] | 6 | 9 | |||
| [ | 526 | hypothetical protein [2 methyl-citrate dehydratase] | 6 | 9 | ||
| 100 | PE family protein (PE11) [triacyl glycerole lipase] | 6 | 9 | |||
| 94 | putative ESAT-6-like protein ESXN (ESAT-6-like protein 5) | 6 | 9 | |||
| 374 | hypothetical protein [peptide release factor erF1] | 6 | 9 | |||
The antigens are sorted by the qualitative score (Qual Total) and subsequently by the quantitative score (Quant Total) (see text). Group I includes all antigens with a qualitative score 8 and above, provided that the quantitative score is not lower than 12. The rest of the antigens having a qualitative score of 8 and those having a qualitative score of 7 and a quantitative score not lower than 9 were clustered into Group II. Group III included antigens with qualitative scores of 7 (and quantitative score of 8) and 6 (with a quantitative scores 9 and up). (a) The Gene name and annotation are based on the data deposited at the NCBI, [GenBank: AL123456]. In square brackets: updated gene name and/or annotation, resulting from the analyses conducted in this study.
Figure 2Distribution of Mtb genes according to functional categories. The categories are adapted from Cole and his coworkers [26]. For practical reasons, the categories of "Conserved hypothetical proteins" and "Proteins of unknown function" were joined (category (III) in the Figure). Category (VI) encompasses the functional classes which were either less abundant or non existent in the list of 189 antigens selected herein. The percentage of genes in each of the functional categories is provided, as retrieved from Camus and his coworkers for the whole genome (A) [51], and calculated for this study 189 selected antigens (B) and 45 top-ranking antigens (C).