Literature DB >> 18502501

In vivo degradation of three-dimensional silk fibroin scaffolds.

Yongzhong Wang1, Darya D Rudym, Ashley Walsh, Lauren Abrahamsen, Hyeon-Joo Kim, Hyun S Kim, Carl Kirker-Head, David L Kaplan.   

Abstract

Three-dimensional porous scaffolds prepared from regenerated silk fibroin using either an all-aqueous process or a process involving an organic solvent, hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP), have shown promise in cell culture and tissue engineering applications. However, their biocompatibility and in vivo degradation have not been fully established. The present study was conducted to systematically investigate how processing method (aqueous vs. organic solvent) and processing variables (silk fibroin concentration and pore size) affect the short-term (up to 2 months) and long-term (up to 1 year) in vivo behavior of the protein scaffolds in both nude and Lewis rats. The samples were analyzed by histology for scaffold morphological changes and tissue ingrowth, and by real-time RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry for immune responses. Throughout the period of implantation, all scaffolds were well tolerated by the host animals and immune responses to the implants were mild. Most scaffolds prepared from the all-aqueous process degraded to completion between 2 and 6 months, while those prepared from organic solvent (hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP)) process persisted beyond 1 year. Due to widespread cellular invasion throughout the scaffold, the degradation of aqueous-derived scaffolds appears to be more homogeneous than that of HFIP-derived scaffolds. In general and especially for the HFIP-derived scaffolds, a higher original silk fibroin concentration (e.g. 17%) and smaller pore size (e.g. 100-200microm) resulted in lower levels of tissue ingrowth and slower degradation. These results demonstrate that the in vivo behavior of the three-dimensional silk fibroin scaffolds is related to the morphological and structural features that resulted from different scaffold preparation processes. The insights gained in this study can serve as a guide for processing scenarios to match desired morphological and structural features and degradation time with tissue-specific applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18502501      PMCID: PMC3206261          DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  41 in total

Review 1.  Molecular biology of spider silk.

Authors:  S Winkler; D L Kaplan
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  Promotive effects of a silk film on epidermal recovery from full-thickness skin wounds.

Authors:  A Sugihara; K Sugiura; H Morita; T Ninagawa; K Tubouchi; R Tobe; M Izumiya; T Horio; N G Abraham; S Ikehara
Journal:  Proc Soc Exp Biol Med       Date:  2000-10

Review 3.  Genetic engineering of fibrous proteins: spider dragline silk and collagen.

Authors:  Cheryl Wong Po Foo; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2002-10-18       Impact factor: 15.470

4.  Porous 3-D scaffolds from regenerated silk fibroin.

Authors:  Rina Nazarov; Hyoung-Joon Jin; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.988

5.  Engineering bone-like tissue in vitro using human bone marrow stem cells and silk scaffolds.

Authors:  Lorenz Meinel; Vassilis Karageorgiou; Sandra Hofmann; Robert Fajardo; Brian Snyder; Chunmei Li; Ludwig Zichner; Robert Langer; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic; David L Kaplan
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 4.396

6.  Bone tissue engineering using human mesenchymal stem cells: effects of scaffold material and medium flow.

Authors:  Lorenz Meinel; Vassilis Karageorgiou; Robert Fajardo; Brian Snyder; Vivek Shinde-Patil; Ludwig Zichner; David Kaplan; Robert Langer; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Non-invasive time-lapsed monitoring and quantification of engineered bone-like tissue.

Authors:  Henri Hagenmüller; Sandra Hofmann; Thomas Kohler; Hans P Merkle; David L Kaplan; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic; Ralph Müller; Lorenz Meinel
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2007-06-02       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Use of collagen sponge incorporating transforming growth factor-beta1 to promote bone repair in skull defects in rabbits.

Authors:  Hiroki Ueda; Liu Hong; Masaya Yamamoto; Keiji Shigeno; Masatoshi Inoue; Toshinari Toba; Makoto Yoshitani; Tatsuo Nakamura; Yasuhiko Tabata; Yasuhiko Shimizu
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 9.  Silk-based biomaterials.

Authors:  Gregory H Altman; Frank Diaz; Caroline Jakuba; Tara Calabro; Rebecca L Horan; Jingsong Chen; Helen Lu; John Richmond; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  The inflammatory responses to silk films in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Lorenz Meinel; Sandra Hofmann; Vassilis Karageorgiou; Carl Kirker-Head; John McCool; Gloria Gronowicz; Ludwig Zichner; Robert Langer; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 12.479

View more
  174 in total

1.  Multilayered silk scaffolds for meniscus tissue engineering.

Authors:  Biman B Mandal; Sang-Hyug Park; Eun S Gil; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Arrayed Hollow Channels in Silk-based Scaffolds Provide Functional Outcomes for Engineering Critically-sized Tissue Constructs.

Authors:  Jelena Rnjak-Kovacina; Lindsay S Wray; Julianne M Golinski; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 18.808

3.  Silk fibroin as a biomaterial substrate for corneal epithelial cell sheet generation.

Authors:  Jingbo Liu; Brian D Lawrence; Aihong Liu; Ivan R Schwab; Lauro A Oliveira; Mark I Rosenblatt
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Materials fabrication from Bombyx mori silk fibroin.

Authors:  Danielle N Rockwood; Rucsanda C Preda; Tuna Yücel; Xiaoqin Wang; Michael L Lovett; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 13.491

5.  Silk hydrogel for cartilage tissue engineering.

Authors:  Pen-Hsiu Grace Chao; Supansa Yodmuang; Xiaoqin Wang; Lin Sun; David L Kaplan; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.368

6.  Controlled release of cytokines using silk-biomaterials for macrophage polarization.

Authors:  Andrew R D Reeves; Kara L Spiller; Donald O Freytes; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Biocompatible silk step-index optical waveguides.

Authors:  Matthew B Applegate; Giovanni Perotto; David L Kaplan; Fiorenzo G Omenetto
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  A silk-based scaffold platform with tunable architecture for engineering critically-sized tissue constructs.

Authors:  Lindsay S Wray; Jelena Rnjak-Kovacina; Biman B Mandal; Daniel F Schmidt; Eun Seok Gil; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  The effect of sterilization on silk fibroin biomaterial properties.

Authors:  Jelena Rnjak-Kovacina; Teresa M DesRochers; Kelly A Burke; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Macromol Biosci       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 4.979

10.  Regenerated silk materials for functionalized silk orthopedic devices by mimicking natural processing.

Authors:  Chunmei Li; Blake Hotz; Shengjie Ling; Jin Guo; Dylan S Haas; Benedetto Marelli; Fiorenzo Omenetto; Samuel J Lin; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 12.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.