Literature DB >> 15207461

The inflammatory responses to silk films in vitro and in vivo.

Lorenz Meinel1, Sandra Hofmann, Vassilis Karageorgiou, Carl Kirker-Head, John McCool, Gloria Gronowicz, Ludwig Zichner, Robert Langer, Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic, David L Kaplan.   

Abstract

Silks have a long history of biomedical use as sutures. Silk can be purified, chemically modified to attach RGD sequences and processed into highly porous scaffolds for tissue engineering. We report biocompatibility studies of silk films (with or without covalently bound RGD) that were seeded with bone-marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) and (a) cultured in vitro with human MSC or (b) seeded with autologous rat MSC and implanted in vivo. Controls for in vitro studies included tissue culture plastic (TCP; negative control), TCP with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in the cell culture medium (positive control), and collagen films; controls for in vivo studies included collagen, PLA and TCP. After 9 h of culture, the expression of the pro-inflammatory Interleukin 1 beta (IL-1beta) and inflammatory cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) in human MSC were comparable for silk, collagen and TCP. After 30 and 96 h, gene expression of IL-1beta and COX-2 in MSC returned to the baseline (pre-seeding) levels. These data were corroborated by measuring IL-1beta and prostaglandin E2 levels in culture medium. The rate of cell proliferation was higher on silk films than either on collagen or TCP. In vivo, films made of silk, collagen or PLA were seeded with rat MSCs, implanted intramuscularly in rats and harvested after 6 weeks. Histological and immunohistochemical evaluation of silk explants revealed the presence of circumferentially oriented fibroblasts, few blood vessels, macrophages at the implant-host interface, and the absence of giant cells. Inflammatory tissue reaction was more conspicuous around collagen films and even more around PLA films when compared to silk. These data suggest that (a) purified degradable silk is biocompatible and (b) the in vitro cell culture model (hMSC seeded and cultured on biomaterial films) gave inflammatory responses that were comparable to those observed in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15207461     DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  138 in total

1.  Highly tunable elastomeric silk biomaterials.

Authors:  Benjamin P Partlow; Craig W Hanna; Jelena Rnjak-Kovacina; Jodie E Moreau; Matthew B Applegate; Kelly A Burke; Benedetto Marelli; Alexander N Mitropoulos; Fiorenzo G Omenetto; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 18.808

2.  Short-term and long-term effects of orthopedic biodegradable implants.

Authors:  Ami R Amini; James S Wallace; Syam P Nukavarapu
Journal:  J Long Term Eff Med Implants       Date:  2011

3.  Stabilization of vaccines and antibiotics in silk and eliminating the cold chain.

Authors:  Jeney Zhang; Eleanor Pritchard; Xiao Hu; Thomas Valentin; Bruce Panilaitis; Fiorenzo G Omenetto; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Tissue response and biodegradation of composite scaffolds prepared from Thai silk fibroin, gelatin and hydroxyapatite.

Authors:  Hathairat Tungtasana; Somruetai Shuangshoti; Shanop Shuangshoti; Sorada Kanokpanont; David L Kaplan; Tanom Bunaprasert; Siriporn Damrongsakkul
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Materials fabrication from Bombyx mori silk fibroin.

Authors:  Danielle N Rockwood; Rucsanda C Preda; Tuna Yücel; Xiaoqin Wang; Michael L Lovett; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 13.491

6.  Synthesis and characterization of silk fibroin microparticles for intra-articular drug delivery.

Authors:  Timothy K Mwangi; Robby D Bowles; David M Tainter; Richard D Bell; David L Kaplan; Lori A Setton
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 5.875

Review 7.  Review physical and chemical aspects of stabilization of compounds in silk.

Authors:  Eleanor M Pritchard; Patrick B Dennis; Fiorenzo Omenetto; Rajesh R Naik; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 2.505

8.  Maleimide-thiol coupling of a bioactive peptide to an elastin-like protein polymer.

Authors:  Swathi Ravi; Venkata R Krishnamurthy; Jeffrey M Caves; Carolyn A Haller; Elliot L Chaikof
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 8.947

9.  A silk-based scaffold platform with tunable architecture for engineering critically-sized tissue constructs.

Authors:  Lindsay S Wray; Jelena Rnjak-Kovacina; Biman B Mandal; Daniel F Schmidt; Eun Seok Gil; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Optimization strategies for electrospun silk fibroin tissue engineering scaffolds.

Authors:  Anne J Meinel; Kristopher E Kubow; Enrico Klotzsch; Marcos Garcia-Fuentes; Michael L Smith; Viola Vogel; Hans P Merkle; Lorenz Meinel
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 12.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.