Literature DB >> 10998199

Promotive effects of a silk film on epidermal recovery from full-thickness skin wounds.

A Sugihara1, K Sugiura, H Morita, T Ninagawa, K Tubouchi, R Tobe, M Izumiya, T Horio, N G Abraham, S Ikehara.   

Abstract

We examined the effects of the transparent fibroin film (silk film) on full-thickness skin wounds. Full-thickness dermatotomies (15 mm x 9 mm) were prepared on the dorsal wall of CRJ:CD-1 nu/nu (ICR nu/nu) mice. The area of the wounds dressed with silk film was reduced to 10% of that made by the dermatotomy 14 days after the dermatotomy and were covered with regenerated epidermis 21 days after the dermatotomy. In contrast, less recovery and epidermal regeneration were found 14 days after dermatotomy in the wounds dressed with a conventional hydrocolloid dressing (Duro Active). Furthermore, only partial incomplete epidemal growth was obtained 21 days after dermatotomy. Most importantly, the healing time of wounds dressed with silk film was 7 days shorter than those dressed with DuoActive dressing. The silk film showed an almost similar or slightly better promotive effect as the lyophilized porcine dermis (Alloask D), which is used as a dressing for burns, ulcers, and decubitis. Histologic findings revealed that there was greater collagen regeneration and less inflammation and neutrophil-lymphocyte infiltration of the wounds dressed with silk film than with DuoActive dressing. It is clear that regeneration of the epidermis and dermis of the wound beds covered with silk film was faster than with DuoActive dressing. Finally, silk film is easily obtainable, sterilizable, and transparent, and it allows easy observation of tissue recovery. Therefore, silk film offers advantages over other dressings and may be clinically useful for wound treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10998199     DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1373.2000.22507.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Soc Exp Biol Med        ISSN: 0037-9727


  22 in total

1.  Silk as a Biomaterial.

Authors:  Charu Vepari; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Prog Polym Sci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 29.190

2.  Electrospun silk fibroin-gelatin composite tubular matrices as scaffolds for small diameter blood vessel regeneration.

Authors:  Chiara Marcolin; Lorenza Draghi; MariaCristina Tanzi; Silvia Faré
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  An ectopic study of apatite-coated silk fibroin scaffolds seeded with AdBMP-2-modified canine bMSCs.

Authors:  Kaige Lü; Ling Xu; Lunguo Xia; Yilin Zhang; Xiuli Zhang; David L Kaplan; Xinquan Jiang; Fuqiang Zhang
Journal:  J Biomater Sci Polym Ed       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.517

4.  Wound healing effect of silk fibroin/alginate-blended sponge in full thickness skin defect of rat.

Authors:  Dae-Hyun Roh; Seuk-Yun Kang; Jeom-Yong Kim; Young-Bae Kwon; Hae Young Kweon; Kwang-Gill Lee; Young-Hwan Park; Rong-Min Baek; Chan-Yeong Heo; Joon Choe; Jang-Hern Lee
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Gentamicin-loaded wound dressing with polyvinyl alcohol/dextran hydrogel: gel characterization and in vivo healing evaluation.

Authors:  Ma-Ro Hwang; Jong Oh Kim; Jeong Hoon Lee; Yong Il Kim; Jeong Hoon Kim; Sun Woo Chang; Sung Gju Jin; Jung Ae Kim; Won Seok Lyoo; Sung Soo Han; Sae Kwang Ku; Chul Soon Yong; Han-Gon Choi
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 3.246

6.  Helicoidal multi-lamellar features of RGD-functionalized silk biomaterials for corneal tissue engineering.

Authors:  Eun Seok Gil; Biman B Mandal; Sang-Hyug Park; Jeffrey K Marchant; Fiorenzo G Omenetto; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Skin ph variations from the acute phase to re-epithelialization in burn patients treated with new materials (burnshield®, semipermeable adhesive film, dermasilk®, and hyalomatrix®). Non-invasive preliminary experimental clinical trial.

Authors:  E Osti
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2008-06-30

8.  Mulberry non-engineered silk gland protein vis-à-vis silk cocoon protein engineered by silkworms as biomaterial matrices.

Authors:  Joydip Kundu; Moumita Dewan; Sarani Ghoshal; S C Kundu
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 9.  In vivo bioresponses to silk proteins.

Authors:  Amy E Thurber; Fiorenzo G Omenetto; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  In vivo degradation of three-dimensional silk fibroin scaffolds.

Authors:  Yongzhong Wang; Darya D Rudym; Ashley Walsh; Lauren Abrahamsen; Hyeon-Joo Kim; Hyun S Kim; Carl Kirker-Head; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 12.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.