Literature DB >> 18502190

Telomerase-dependent and -independent chromosome healing in mouse embryonic stem cells.

Qing Gao1, Gloria E Reynolds, Andrew Wilcox, Douglas Miller, Peggie Cheung, Steven E Artandi, John P Murnane.   

Abstract

Telomeres play an important role in protecting the ends of chromosomes and preventing chromosome fusion. We have previously demonstrated that double-strand breaks near telomeres in mammalian cells result in either the addition of a new telomere at the site of the break, termed chromosome healing, or sister chromatid fusion that initiates chromosome instability. In the present study, we have investigated the role of telomerase in chromosome healing and the importance of chromosome healing in preventing chromosome instability. In embryonic stem cell lines that are wild type for the catalytic subunit of telomerase (TERT), chromosome healing at I-SceI-induced double-strand breaks near telomeres accounted for 22 of 35 rearrangements, with the new telomeres added directly at the site of the break in all but one instance. In contrast, in two TERT-knockout embryonic stem cell lines, chromosome healing accounted for only 1 of 62 rearrangements, with a 23 bp insertion at the site of the sole chromosome-healing event. However, in a third TERT-knockout embryonic stem cell line, 10PTKO-A, chromosome healing was a common event that accounted for 20 of 34 rearrangements. Although this chromosome healing also occurred at the I-SceI site, differences in the microhomology at the site of telomere addition demonstrated that the mechanism was distinct from that in wild-type embryonic stem cell lines. In addition, the newly added telomeres in 10PTKO-A shortened with time in culture, eventually resulting in either telomere elongation through a telomerase-independent mechanism or loss of the subtelomeric plasmid sequences entirely. The combined results demonstrate that chromosome healing can occur through both telomerase-dependent and -independent mechanisms, and that although both mechanisms can prevent degradation and sister chromatid fusion, neither mechanism is efficient enough to prevent sister chromatid fusion from occurring in many cells experiencing double-strand breaks near telomeres.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18502190      PMCID: PMC2597172          DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2008.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  59 in total

1.  Telomerase-mediated telomere addition in vivo requires DNA primase and DNA polymerases alpha and delta.

Authors:  S J Diede; D E Gottschling
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1999-12-23       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  Telomeres and their control.

Authors:  M J McEachern; A Krauskopf; E H Blackburn
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 16.830

3.  Measurements of telomere length on individual chromosomes by image cytometry.

Authors:  S S Poon; P M Lansdorp
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.441

4.  Sister chromatid gene conversion is a prominent double-strand break repair pathway in mammalian cells.

Authors:  R D Johnson; M Jasin
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-07-03       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  DNA double-strand break repair in cell-free extracts from Ku80-deficient cells: implications for Ku serving as an alignment factor in non-homologous DNA end joining.

Authors:  E Feldmann; V Schmiemann; W Goedecke; S Reichenberger; P Pfeiffer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 6.  Telomeres and human disease: ageing, cancer and beyond.

Authors:  Maria A Blasco
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  The relationship between spontaneous telomere loss and chromosome instability in a human tumor cell line.

Authors:  B Fouladi; L Sabatier; D Miller; G Pottier; J P Murnane
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.715

8.  Characterization of terminal deletions at 7q32 and 22q13.3 healed by De novo telomere addition.

Authors:  H Varley; S Di; S W Scherer; N J Royle
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Pif1p helicase, a catalytic inhibitor of telomerase in yeast.

Authors:  J Zhou; E K Monson; S C Teng; V P Schulz; V A Zakian
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-08-04       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Telomere dysfunction promotes non-reciprocal translocations and epithelial cancers in mice.

Authors:  S E Artandi; S Chang; S L Lee; S Alson; G J Gottlieb; L Chin; R A DePinho
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-08-10       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Regulation of telomere addition at DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Cyril Ribeyre; David Shore
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  PIF1 disruption or NBS1 hypomorphism does not affect chromosome healing or fusion resulting from double-strand breaks near telomeres in murine embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Gloria E Reynolds; Qing Gao; Douglas Miller; Bryan E Snow; Lea A Harrington; John P Murnane
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2011-09-25

Review 3.  Telomere loss as a mechanism for chromosome instability in human cancer.

Authors:  John P Murnane
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 4.  Telomere dysfunction and chromosome instability.

Authors:  John P Murnane
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  Chromosome Healing Is Promoted by the Telomere Cap Component Hiphop in Drosophila.

Authors:  Rebeccah L Kurzhals; Laura Fanti; A C Gonzalez Ebsen; Yikang S Rong; Sergio Pimpinelli; Kent G Golic
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Telomeres and genomic evolution.

Authors:  Duncan M Baird
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Parameters affecting telomere-mediated chromosomal truncation in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Andrew D Nelson; Jonathan C Lamb; Pierre S Kobrossly; Dorothy E Shippen
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 11.277

8.  Homolog-Dependent Repair Following Dicentric Chromosome Breakage in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Jayaram Bhandari; Travis Karg; Kent G Golic
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Suppression of chromosome healing and anticheckpoint pathways in yeast postsenescence survivors.

Authors:  Xianning Lai; Jörg Heierhorst
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Effect of telomere proximity on telomere position effect, chromosome healing, and sensitivity to DNA double-strand breaks in a human tumor cell line.

Authors:  Avanti Kulkarni; Oliver Zschenker; Gloria Reynolds; Douglas Miller; John P Murnane
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 4.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.