BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer among men in the United States. In contrast, cancer of the seminal vesicle is exceedingly rare, despite that the prostate and seminal vesicle share similar histology, secretory function, androgen dependency, blood supply, and (in part) embryonic origin. We hypothesized that gene-expression differences between prostate and seminal vesicle might inform mechanisms underlying the higher incidence of prostate cancer. METHODS: Whole-genome DNA microarrays were used to profile gene expression of 11 normal prostate and 7 seminal vesicle specimens (including six matched pairs) obtained from radical prostatectomy. Supervised analysis was used to identify genes differentially expressed between normal prostate and seminal vesicle, and this list was then cross-referenced to genes differentially expressed between normal and cancerous prostate. Expression patterns of selected genes were confirmed by immunohistochemistry using a tissue microarray. RESULTS: We identified 32 genes that displayed a highly statistically significant expression pattern with highest levels in seminal vesicle, lower levels in normal prostate, and lowest levels in prostate cancer. Among these genes was the known candidate prostate tumor suppressor GSTP1 (involved in xenobiotic detoxification). The expression pattern of GSTP1 and four other genes, ABCG2 (xenobiotic transport), CRABP2 (retinoic acid signaling), GATA3 (lineage-specific transcription), and SLPI (immune response), was confirmed by immunohistochemistry. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings identify candidate prostate cancer genes whose reduced expression in prostate (compared to seminal vesicle) may be permissive to prostate cancer initiation. Such genes and their pathways may inform mechanisms of prostate carcinogenesis, and suggest new opportunities for prostate cancer prevention. Copyright (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
BACKGROUND:Prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer among men in the United States. In contrast, cancer of the seminal vesicle is exceedingly rare, despite that the prostate and seminal vesicle share similar histology, secretory function, androgen dependency, blood supply, and (in part) embryonic origin. We hypothesized that gene-expression differences between prostate and seminal vesicle might inform mechanisms underlying the higher incidence of prostate cancer. METHODS: Whole-genome DNA microarrays were used to profile gene expression of 11 normal prostate and 7 seminal vesicle specimens (including six matched pairs) obtained from radical prostatectomy. Supervised analysis was used to identify genes differentially expressed between normal prostate and seminal vesicle, and this list was then cross-referenced to genes differentially expressed between normal and cancerous prostate. Expression patterns of selected genes were confirmed by immunohistochemistry using a tissue microarray. RESULTS: We identified 32 genes that displayed a highly statistically significant expression pattern with highest levels in seminal vesicle, lower levels in normal prostate, and lowest levels in prostate cancer. Among these genes was the known candidate prostate tumor suppressor GSTP1 (involved in xenobiotic detoxification). The expression pattern of GSTP1 and four other genes, ABCG2 (xenobiotic transport), CRABP2 (retinoic acid signaling), GATA3 (lineage-specific transcription), and SLPI (immune response), was confirmed by immunohistochemistry. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings identify candidate prostate cancer genes whose reduced expression in prostate (compared to seminal vesicle) may be permissive to prostate cancer initiation. Such genes and their pathways may inform mechanisms of prostate carcinogenesis, and suggest new opportunities for prostate cancer prevention. Copyright (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Ali Fuat Okuducu; Viktor Janzen; Yon Ko; Jens Claus Hahne; Hong Lu; Zhan Lu Ma; Peter Albers; Aygun Sahin; Axel Wellmann; Peter Scheinert; Nicolas Wernert Journal: Int J Oncol Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 5.650
Authors: C P Nelson; L C Kidd; J Sauvageot; W B Isaacs; A M De Marzo; J D Groopman; W G Nelson; T W Kensler Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2001-01-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Hanna Kim; Jacques Lapointe; Gulsah Kaygusuz; David E Ong; Chunde Li; Matt van de Rijn; James D Brooks; Jonathan R Pollack Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2005-09-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: M J Robbins; D Michalovich; J Hill; A R Calver; A D Medhurst; I Gloger; M Sims; D N Middlemiss; M N Pangalos Journal: Genomics Date: 2000-07-01 Impact factor: 5.736
Authors: Joaquín Villar; María Isabel Arenas; Caitlin M MacCarthy; María José Blánquez; Oscar M Tirado; Vicente Notario Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2007-11-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Jacques Lapointe; Chunde Li; John P Higgins; Matt van de Rijn; Eric Bair; Kelli Montgomery; Michelle Ferrari; Lars Egevad; Walter Rayford; Ulf Bergerheim; Peter Ekman; Angelo M DeMarzo; Robert Tibshirani; David Botstein; Patrick O Brown; James D Brooks; Jonathan R Pollack Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-01-07 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jerry Usary; Victor Llaca; Gamze Karaca; Shafaq Presswala; Mehmet Karaca; Xiaping He; Anita Langerød; Rolf Kåresen; Daniel S Oh; Lynn G Dressler; Per E Lønning; Robert L Strausberg; Stephen Chanock; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Charles M Perou Journal: Oncogene Date: 2004-10-07 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: James L Chen; Jianrong Li; Kyle J Kiriluk; Alex M Rosen; Gladell P Paner; Tatjana Antic; Yves A Lussier; Donald J Vander Griend Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-06-21 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Marilia F Calmon; Rodrigo V Rodrigues; Carla M Kaneto; Ricardo P Moura; Sabrina D Silva; Louise Danielle C Mota; Daniel G Pinheiro; Cesar Torres; Alex F de Carvalho; Patrícia M Cury; Fabio D Nunes; Ines Nobuko Nishimoto; Fernando A Soares; Adriana M A da Silva; Luis P Kowalski; Helena Brentani; Cleslei F Zanelli; Wilson A Silva; Paula Rahal; Eloiza H Tajara; Dirce M Carraro; Anamaria A Camargo; Sandro R Valentini Journal: Neoplasia Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 5.715
Authors: Oh-Joon Kwon; Li Zhang; Jianghua Wang; Qingtai Su; Qin Feng; Xiang H F Zhang; Sendurai A Mani; Robia Paulter; Chad J Creighton; Michael M Ittmann; Li Xin Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2016-06-13 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Dogus Murat Altintas; Nathalie Allioli; Myriam Decaussin; Simon de Bernard; Alain Ruffion; Jacques Samarut; Virginie Vlaeminck-Guillem Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-06-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Raymond A Clarke; Zhongming Zhao; An-Yuan Guo; Kathrein Roper; Linda Teng; Zhi-Ming Fang; Hema Samaratunga; Martin F Lavin; Robert A Gardiner Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-03-25 Impact factor: 3.240