PURPOSE: The aberrant activity of developmental pathways in prostate cancer may provide significant insight into predicting tumor initiation and progression, as well as identifying novel therapeutic targets. To this end, despite shared androgen-dependence and functional similarities to the prostate gland, seminal vesicle cancer is exceptionally rare. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We conducted genomic pathway analyses comparing patient-matched normal prostate and seminal vesicle epithelial cells to identify novel pathways for tumor initiation and progression. Derived gene expression profiles were grouped into cancer biomodules using a protein-protein network algorithm to analyze their relationship to known oncogenes. Each resultant biomodule was assayed for its prognostic ability against publically available prostate cancer patient gene array datasets. RESULTS: Analyses show that the embryonic developmental biomodule containing four homeobox gene family members (Meis1, Meis2, Pbx1, and HoxA9) detects a survival difference in a set of watchful-waiting patients (n = 172, P = 0.05), identify men who are more likely to recur biochemically postprostatectomy (n = 78, P = 0.02), correlate with Gleason score (r = 0.98, P = 0.02), and distinguish between normal prostate, primary tumor, and metastatic disease. In contrast to other cancer types, Meis1, Meis2, and Pbx1 expression is decreased in poor-prognosis tumors, implying that they function as tumor suppressor genes for prostate cancer. Immunohistochemical staining documents nuclear basal-epithelial and stromal Meis2 staining, with loss of Meis2 expression in prostate tumors. CONCLUSION: These data implicate deregulation of the Hox protein cofactors Meis1, Meis2, and Pbx1 as serving a critical function to suppress prostate cancer initiation and progression.
PURPOSE: The aberrant activity of developmental pathways in prostate cancer may provide significant insight into predicting tumor initiation and progression, as well as identifying novel therapeutic targets. To this end, despite shared androgen-dependence and functional similarities to the prostate gland, seminal vesicle cancer is exceptionally rare. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We conducted genomic pathway analyses comparing patient-matched normal prostate and seminal vesicle epithelial cells to identify novel pathways for tumor initiation and progression. Derived gene expression profiles were grouped into cancer biomodules using a protein-protein network algorithm to analyze their relationship to known oncogenes. Each resultant biomodule was assayed for its prognostic ability against publically available prostate cancerpatient gene array datasets. RESULTS: Analyses show that the embryonic developmental biomodule containing four homeobox gene family members (Meis1, Meis2, Pbx1, and HoxA9) detects a survival difference in a set of watchful-waiting patients (n = 172, P = 0.05), identify men who are more likely to recur biochemically postprostatectomy (n = 78, P = 0.02), correlate with Gleason score (r = 0.98, P = 0.02), and distinguish between normal prostate, primary tumor, and metastatic disease. In contrast to other cancer types, Meis1, Meis2, and Pbx1 expression is decreased in poor-prognosis tumors, implying that they function as tumor suppressor genes for prostate cancer. Immunohistochemical staining documents nuclear basal-epithelial and stromal Meis2 staining, with loss of Meis2 expression in prostate tumors. CONCLUSION: These data implicate deregulation of the Hox protein cofactors Meis1, Meis2, and Pbx1 as serving a critical function to suppress prostate cancer initiation and progression.
Authors: Paul Shannon; Andrew Markiel; Owen Ozier; Nitin S Baliga; Jonathan T Wang; Daniel Ramage; Nada Amin; Benno Schwikowski; Trey Ideker Journal: Genome Res Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Charlie D Chen; Derek S Welsbie; Chris Tran; Sung Hee Baek; Randy Chen; Robert Vessella; Michael G Rosenfeld; Charles L Sawyers Journal: Nat Med Date: 2003-12-21 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Amy Brock; Silva Krause; Hu Li; Marek Kowalski; Michael S Goldberg; James J Collins; Donald E Ingber Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2014-01-01 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Virpi H Laitinen; Tommi Rantapero; Daniel Fischer; Elisa M Vuorinen; Teuvo L J Tammela; Tiina Wahlfors; Johanna Schleutker Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2014-11-08 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Young Ji Lee; Andrew D Boyd; Jianrong John Li; Vincent Gardeux; Colleen Kenost; Don Saner; Haiquan Li; Ivo Abraham; Jerry A Krishnan; Yves A Lussier Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2014-11-14
Authors: Rajendra P Gajula; Sivarajan T Chettiar; Russell D Williams; Saravanan Thiyagarajan; Yoshinori Kato; Khaled Aziz; Ruoqi Wang; Nishant Gandhi; Aaron T Wild; Farhad Vesuna; Jinfang Ma; Tarek Salih; Jessica Cades; Elana Fertig; Shyam Biswal; Timothy F Burns; Christine H Chung; Charles M Rudin; Joseph M Herman; Russell K Hales; Venu Raman; Steven S An; Phuoc T Tran Journal: Mol Cancer Res Date: 2013-08-27 Impact factor: 5.852
Authors: Raj R Bhanvadia; Calvin VanOpstall; Hannah Brechka; Nimrod S Barashi; Marc Gillard; Erin M McAuley; Juan Manuel Vasquez; Gladell Paner; Wen-Ching Chan; Jorge Andrade; Angelo M De Marzo; Misop Han; Russell Z Szmulewitz; Donald J Vander Griend Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 12.531