Literature DB >> 18500621

In-line head and neck position is preferable for tracheal intubation with the Airtraq laryngoscope compared to the sniffing position.

Yoshihiro Hirabayashi1, Norimasa Seo.   

Abstract

We aimed to determine which position, the in-line head and neck position or the sniffing position, was preferable for tracheal intubation with the Airtraq laryngoscope. In all, 20 anesthetists performed tracheal intubations on a manikin with either an in-line head and neck position or the sniffing position. There were no differences in the success rate and the time to intubation between the two positions. The overall number of teeth clicks was lower in the in-line head and neck position than in the sniffing position (P < 0.05). The score for preference of position, on a visual analogue scale, was better for the in-line head and neck position than for the sniffing position (P < 0.01). We concluded that the in-line head and neck position was preferable for tracheal intubation with the Airtraq laryngoscope compared to the sniffing position.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18500621     DOI: 10.1007/s00540-007-0601-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anesth        ISSN: 0913-8668            Impact factor:   2.078


  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of intubation using the Airtraq or Macintosh laryngoscope by anaesthetists in easy and simulated difficult laryngoscopy--a manikin study.

Authors:  C H Maharaj; B D Higgins; B H Harte; J G Laffey
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 6.955

2.  Emergency use of the Airtraq laryngoscope in traumatic asphyxia: case report.

Authors:  John J M Black
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  A comparison of tracheal intubation using the Airtraq or the Macintosh laryngoscope in routine airway management: A randomised, controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  C H Maharaj; D O'Croinin; G Curley; B H Harte; J G Laffey
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  The Airtraq as a rescue airway device following failed direct laryngoscopy: a case series.

Authors:  C H Maharaj; J F Costello; J G McDonnell; B H Harte; J G Laffey
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 6.955

  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of Airtraq optical laryngoscope and Storz video laryngoscope in a cadaver model.

Authors:  Michael C Wadman; Travis W Dierks; Chad E Branecki; Claudia L Barthold; Lance H Hoffman; Lina Lander; Carol S Lomneth; Richard A Walker
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2011

2.  A systematic review of the role of videolaryngoscopy in successful orotracheal intubation.

Authors:  David W Healy; Oana Maties; David Hovord; Sachin Kheterpal
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 2.217

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.