Literature DB >> 11889511

Is human imitation based on a mirror-neurone system? Some behavioural evidence.

Andreas Wohlschläger1, Harold Bekkering.   

Abstract

Recently, a population of neurones was discovered in the monkey's ( Macaca nemestrina) ventrolateral part of the pre-motor cortex (area F5). It is specialised for recognising object-oriented actions, regardless of whether these actions are performed or observed by the monkey. The latter observation led to the term mirror-neurones, and because these cells respond to both observed and executed actions, it seems likely that neurones of that type became co-opted during hominid evolution to serve the imitative behaviours that are so prevalent in our species. There is recent physiological evidence that Broca's area, the human ( Homo sapiens) homologue of monkey's area F5, is involved in the imitation of finger movements. However, concluding that human imitation is based on a mirror-neurone system is premature, because: (1) imitation in monkeys does not reach the same level as in humans or apes and (2) monkeys' mirror-neurones are specialised for object-oriented actions. This specialisation has not yet been demonstrated in adult humans. We investigated the role of objects in human imitation behaviour in a response time experiment. Subjects had to imitate downward movements of an index finger. In one condition, the observed finger touched one of two dots either ipsi- or contralaterally. In the other condition, the very same movements had to be imitated. However, there were no dots on the table. The presence of dots had a decisive influence on error patterns and on response times, but did not influence the movement proper. Dots specifically reduced the onset latency of ipsilateral finger movements and they specifically increased the use of the wrong finger, when contralateral movements were required. In general, results showed that objects also drive human imitation behaviour. Hence, it is very likely that imitation emerged from the mirror-neurone system of the common ancestor of monkeys and humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11889511     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-001-0993-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  20 in total

1.  Action generation and action perception in imitation: an instance of the ideomotor principle.

Authors:  Andreas Wohlschläger; Merideth Gattis; Harold Bekkering
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Movements, actions and tool-use actions: an ideomotor approach to imitation.

Authors:  Cristina Massen; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Covert motor activity on NoGo trials in a task sharing paradigm: evidence from the lateralized readiness potential.

Authors:  Antje Holländer; Christina Jung; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Variability of EEG synchronization prior to and during observation and execution of a sequential finger movement.

Authors:  Claire Calmels; Paul Holmes; Gilbert Jarry; Magaly Hars; Emilie Lopez; Aurore Paillard; Cornelis J Stam
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Interference of grasping observation during prehension, a behavioural study.

Authors:  H C Dijkerman; M C Smit
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Interference of action perception on action production increases across the adult life span.

Authors:  Stephanie Wermelinger; Anja Gampe; Jannis Behr; Moritz M Daum
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  What are you doing? How active and observational experience shape infants' action understanding.

Authors:  Sabine Hunnius; Harold Bekkering
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  The phi complex as a neuromarker of human social coordination.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Tognoli; Julien Lagarde; Gonzalo C DeGuzman; J A Scott Kelso
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Is gaze following purely reflexive or goal-directed instead? Revisiting the automaticity of orienting attention by gaze cues.

Authors:  Paola Ricciardelli; Samuele Carcagno; Giuseppe Vallar; Emanuela Bricolo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The role of motor simulation in action perception: a neuropsychological case study.

Authors:  Terry Eskenazi; Marc Grosjean; Glyn W Humphreys; Guenther Knoblich
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-04-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.