This study records a severe outbreak of a disease on Zizyphus mucronata (Rhamnaceae) in Greater Kruger National Park, South Africa. The causal agent of the disease was found to be Coniodictyum chevalieri, a fungus previously believed to be very rare. Detailed illustrations of the symptoms and fungus are presented in order to facilitate future studies. The known geographical distribution of Coniodictyum is presented in relation to the distribution of its host, and a short review of its systematic history is also given. This also treats an invalidly published species name in South Africa, which has confused the literature. A DNA-based phylogeny is presented for the pathogen and this reflects the unique nature of its geographical distribution and biology.
This study records a severe outbreak of a disease on Zizyphus mucronata (Rhamnaceae) in Greater Kruger National Park, South Africa. The causal agent of the disease was found to be Coniodictyum chevalieri, a fungus previously believed to be very rare. Detailed illustrations of the symptoms and fungus are presented in order to facilitate future studies. The known geographical distribution of Coniodictyum is presented in relation to the distribution of its host, and a short review of its systematic history is also given. This also treats an invalidly published species name in South Africa, which has confused the literature. A DNA-based phylogeny is presented for the pathogen and this reflects the unique nature of its geographical distribution and biology.
The Kruger National Park (KNP) is one of the world's most famous wildlife
reserves covering an area of about 20000 km2. It is not only home
to 132 free-ranging mammals (Pienaar
1987), among them well-known mega-herbivores and large predators,
but also provides the habitat for some 500 species of birds and 2000 species
of higher plants; almost 400 of South Africa's approximately 1100 tree species
can be found in the park (van Wyk
1984, Anderson
1999). Despite the many serious diseases that have decimated
native trees in various parts of the world during the course of the last 100
years, very little is known regarding the health of native trees in southern
Africa, including of the KNP. This study constitutes part of a project aimed
at increasing the basic understanding of the role that diseases might play in
the life cycle of a native tree species in southern Africa.Buffalo Thorn (Zizyphus mucronata) is a common tree species in the
Southern African Savanna and Nama Karoo biome (biome definition according to
Rutherford (2003). This
savanna habitat distribution is also mirrored by its overall distribution in
Africa (Fig. 1). In these
areas, it is found on many different soil types, but it is especially abundant
on brackish flats, along rivers on alluvial soils, and it also shows a special
preference for termite mounds (van Wyk
1984, Coates Palgrave
2002). Due to its abundance, Z. mucronata is an important
food source for a great variety of animals both browsing (e.g. elephant,
giraffe, black rhino, kudu) and fruit-eating (e.g. warthog, monkeys, birds).
Furthermore, Z. mucronata plays a central role in the nutrition of a
number of insects, being for example a crucial food source for the larval
caterpillars of the Atlas Moths Epiphora mythimnia and
. bauhiniae vera
(Pinhey 1972).
Fig. 1.
Map showing the (savanna biome) distribution of Zizyphus mucronata
in Africa (hatched). White dots represent countries in which Coniodictyum
chevalieri has been reported so far. Characters within dots stand for: S
(Senegal), C (Chad), Z (Zimbabwe), s (South Africa).
The cosmopolitan (sub-)tropically distributed genus Zizyphus
comprises about 100, mostly very drought-tolerant species that are used by
humans for many different purposes. Especially, Z. mauritiana and Z.
jujuba have considerable economic importance as fruit trees in China and
India where they had been grown for some 400 years. Various Zizyphus
species, especially Z. mucronata in Africa, Z. jujuba in
China and India, and Z. joazeiro in South America, are important
sources of traditional African, Chinese, Indian and South American medicine
and various medicinally active compounds, e.g. against fever, tumours, human
parasites, have been isolated, recently (e.g.
Nunes ,
Maurya ,
Arndt & Kayser 2001,
Arndt ).In late March 2004, large numbers of spectacular snow-white powdery balls
were observed mainly on the branches and fruits of Z. mucronata trees
in the southern part of Greater KNP. In this study, we consider the identity
of the fungus causing the epidemic gall disease on Z. mucronata in
the KNP. The fungus is described in detail and its phylogenetic placement is
determined based on DNA sequence comparisons. The associated disease is
discussed and illustrated comprehensively, for the first time providing
photographic records, and its relative importance is considered.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study area and monitoring of the disease
Greater KNP (GKNP) is situated along the northeastern border of South
Africa and extends over about 400 km from the Crocodile River in the south to
the Limpopo River in the north (Figs
2,
3). It consists of the
state-owned core KNP of about 20 000 km2 and bordering private game
reserves that are connected to KNP at its western border, mainly south of the
Olifants River, adding approximately 2000 km2. Details on the
geology, climate and vegetation structure of KNP can be found in e.g. van Wyk
(1972), and Gertenbach
(1980,
1983).
Fig. 2.
South Africa, its provinces, and the location of Kruger National Park.
Fig. 3.
Kruger National Park and adjacent reserves (Greater KNP). The epidemic
affected the whole of the southern park. Its northernmost extension was
somewhere between the road Orpen-Satara and the Olifants River.
Map showing the (savanna biome) distribution of Zizyphus mucronata
in Africa (hatched). White dots represent countries in which Coniodictyum
chevalieri has been reported so far. Characters within dots stand for: S
(Senegal), C (Chad), Z (Zimbabwe), s (South Africa).Observations for this study were made in the southern part of Greater KNP.
To understand the overall distribution of the disease, we monitored the fungal
galls that could be seen from the park tracks. Park rangers also monitored the
distribution of the fungus with the help of GPS-devices during their routine
control tours in June and July 2004. Thus, the overall distribution of the
disease in the national park could be extrapolated although large parts are
not easily accessible. In 2005 the same regions of the park were surveyed
again for the disease. To quantify the disease prevalence at representative
sites in the park, a census was conducted in Manyeleti (compare
Fig. 3) in mid May 2004. Two of
the census plots were approximately 2 ha in size, representing dense bushveld,
a dense form of savanna, and the third was situated in a depression next to a
dam. Each Z. mucronata tree in these plots was scrutinized for the
conspicuous fungal galls. The presence or absence of the disease on trees was
monitored at these sites.South Africa, its provinces, and the location of Kruger National Park.Kruger National Park and adjacent reserves (Greater KNP). The epidemic
affected the whole of the southern park. Its northernmost extension was
somewhere between the road Orpen-Satara and the Olifants River.
Morphological comparisons and isolations
For light microscopy, free-hand sections of the fungal hymenium situated at
the surface of the galls and detached spores were mounted either in water,
clear lactophenol, cotton-blue lactic acid or Hoyer's fluid
(Cunningham 1972) and examined
using a Zeiss Axiovision microscope with phase contrast and interference
optics. Drawings were made of both spores and the most frequent disease
symptoms on branches and fruits.Spores were also examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). For
this purpose spores were fixed on double-sided adhesive tape on a stub and
sputter-coated with gold with an E5200S sputter coater (Polaron, Watford,
England). The samples were subsequently examined with a JSM-840 scanning
electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan).To obtain cultures, spores were thinly dusted onto the surface of
malt-yeast-peptone agar (Van der Walt
& Yarrow 1984) in Petri dishes. The Petri dishes were kept at
room temperature or in incubators at 25° C: Cultures of the fungus have
been deposited in the culture collections of the Forestry and Agricultural
Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria (CMW 23046, CMW
23047).All collections listed in Doidge
(1950) under Coniodictyum
evansii that had been deposited in the National Mycological Herbarium in
Pretoria (PREM) were examined. These include herbarium accession numbers PREM
92, 1006, 1214, 2537, 5648, 8789, 10090, 11240, 11812, 15019, 20611, 30667. It
was not possible to obtain the collection Rh 146, the only report on Z.
jujuba, which had been deposited in the then Mycological Herbarium of the
Department of Agriculture, Southern Rhodesia, which is now the National
Herbarium of Zimbabwe. Representatives of our collections are deposited at
PREM (PREM 59000-WM3450, PREM 59001-WM3488).
DNA sequence comparisons and phylogeny
In order to confirm the identity of the fungus as determined based on
morphological characteristics, DNA sequence comparisons were made and
phylogenetic trees were inferred. DNA was isolated directly from the spores of
infected branches and fruits as well as from cultures using Qiagen Plant Mini
Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer's protocols. For
mechanical cell disruption, spores were crushed between microscope slides, or
in the case of culture material, by using a micro pestle in an Eppendorf cup,
which was cooled with liquid nitrogen. PCR and direct sequencing of both
strands of the 5' end of the large subunit of the ribosomal gene cluster was
performed using the primer pair LR 0R
(Moncalvo ) and LR 6 (Vilgalys &
Hester 1990). PCR and cycle sequencing settings were the same as
those described by Ritz et al.
(2005). DNA sequencing was
done on an ABI PRISM 3100™ sequencer (Perkin-Elmer, Warrington, U.K.).
Contigs of the double-stranded nucleotide sequences were obtained and edited
with the help of Sequencher 4.5 (Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, Michigan).
All available sequences of Cryptobasidiaceae were obtained from
GenBank and accompanied by sequences from Graphiolaceae and
Brachybasidiaceae. Representatives of the latter two families were
used to root the phylogenetic trees. The GenBank accession numbers follow the
species names on the phylogenetic tree.From the above sequences an alignment was produced with MAFFT 5.66
(Katoh )
using the iterative refinement method with the following settings: the
Needleman-Wunsch algorithm active, 2 tree rebuilding steps, 1000 iterations
and default values for gap opening and gap extension penalties (NW-NS-i:
–nofft –retree 2 –maxiterate 1000 [–bl 62] –op
1.530000 –ep 0.123000). Phylogenetic trees from this alignment were
derived by Bio Neighbour Joining (BioNJ
(Gascuel 1997) with the help
of PAUP 4.0b10 (Swofford 2001)
and by Bayesian inference using Metropolis Coupled Monte Carlo Markov Chains
(MC3) and MrBayes 3.1.1
(Huelsenbeck & Ronquist
2001, Ronquist &
Huelsenbeck 2003), respectively. Branch support for neighbour
joining was determined by 5000 bootstrap replicates. For BioNJ the best
fitting model (TIMG) of DNA substitution was determined with the Akaike
Information Criterion (Akaike
1974) implemented in Modeltest 3.7
(Posada & Crandall 1998)
and then used to obtain both the phylogram and the bootstrap consensus tree.
In the case of MC3 the GTR+I+G model
(Tavaré 1986, Yang
1993,
1994), as the most complex
model, was chosen according to the simulation study results of Huelsenbeck
& Rannala (2004) and
default values for the prior settings. Three runs of MC3
with 1.000.000 generations were performed, and every 100th
generation was sampled resulting in 10001 trees. The first 1001 trees were
discarded and the remaining 9000 trees were used, well after the chains had
converged to stationarity, to estimate the posterior probability
distribution. One MC3 analysis was run over 6.000.000 generations
to marginalize the chance that we might have missed a higher plateau of
stationarity. In this case the majority rule consensus tree was constructed
from 50.000 trees and 10.001 trees were discarded as “burn-in”.
The sequences derived in this study have been deposited in GenBank with the
following accession numbers (DQ334805, DQ334806), the alignment is lodged in
TreeBase (study accession number=S1474, matrix accession number=M2652).
RESULTS
Disease symptoms
The fungus causing galls on Z. mucronata in this study
predominantly infects branches and fruits but could also be found on the veins
and peduncles of leaves. In some cases the nodes of branches were most
commonly affected while in most cases the infections were randomly distributed
throughout the trees. The affected organs always reacted to give rise to galls
that produced an abundance of white flour-like spores. The galls ranged from
few millimetres in diameter to over the size of a golf ball, seemingly
correlated to the size of the plant organ affected (compare
Fig. 4).
Fig. 4.
Disease symptoms associated with C. chevalieri infection.
A. Young infections erupting mainly from the nodes of a branch causing wilting
of apical leaves. B. Fully developed infections on a branch from which most
leaves were lost. C. Golf ball-sized gall strangling a branch. D. Almost all
fruits had been infected on some trees. E. Young fruit infection showing seven
galls just erupting from a single fruit. F. Infection at the peak where the
fruit was completely transformed into several galls. G. Severe infections
leading to branch death.
The fungus causing the galls in this study was identified as
Coniodictyum chevalieri Har. & Pat. This is a monotypic genus
that resides in the Cryptobasidiaceae, Exobasidiales, Ustilaginomycetes,
Basidiomycota. The fungus combines two very unique features that make it
easily recognizable. These are the snow-white spore-producing galls breaking
out of diverse organs of Z. mucronata and the morphology of the
multi-celled spores (Figs
4,5,6).
The spores are frequently composed of four longitudinally arranged sections,
each of which is made up of several cells. However, there are frequently
completely odd-numbered spores with extraordinary shapes (compare
Fig. 6) and the general spore
shape might be best characterized by “diverse and uneven”. Spores
were (15-)18-23(-28) μm in size. Detailed drawings of the hymenium can be
found elsewhere (Malençon
1953, Oberwinkler
1977).
Fig. 5.
Line drawings of disease symptoms associated with C.
chevalieri infection. A. Symptoms caused by C.
chevalieri on a branch of Z. mucronata. B. Fruit
infection at the peak of its development. C. Later-stage fruit infection
causing the fruit to shrink and wrinkle. D. Basidiospores of C.
chevalieri.
Fig. 6.
SEM pictures of C. chevalieri basidiospores. A–B.
Uniformly shaped spores with four longitudinal sections, each comprising
several cells. Warts on spore surface. C. Completely irregular spore form. D.
Spore consisting of five longitudinal units. Scale bars = 1 μm.
Disease symptoms associated with C. chevalieriinfection.
A. Young infections erupting mainly from the nodes of a branch causing wilting
of apical leaves. B. Fully developed infections on a branch from which most
leaves were lost. C. Golf ball-sized gall strangling a branch. D. Almost all
fruits had been infected on some trees. E. Young fruit infection showing seven
galls just erupting from a single fruit. F. Infection at the peak where the
fruit was completely transformed into several galls. G. Severe infections
leading to branch death.Using SEM, it was possible to observe for the first time that the surface
of the presumed basidiospores is covered more or less densely with small warts
(Fig. 6) that cannot be seen
with the light microscope. The spores germinated on artificial media, at first
producing conidia and yeast cells (for detailed microscopical descriptions of
these compare Malençon
(1953). Cultures grew very
slowly (ca. 1 mm diam after 5 – 7 d). After about 3 – 5
wk, the single-spore cultures had transformed into a solid slightly
salmon-coloured compact hyphal mass displaying a brain-like surface
structure.The collections of C. chevalieri deposited in PREM had been
collected in the following provinces of South Africa: Limpopo, Mpumalanga,
KwaZulu-Natal and Gauteng. They include the type collection of Hyalodema
evansii (PREM 92). Nine of the twelve specimens had initially been
labelled as H. evansii P. Magnus before being transferred to C.
chevalieri Har. & Pat. The remaining three specimens (PREM 92, 2537,
5648) had been labelled as Coniodictyum evansii P. Magn. This is also
the name that was used in Doidge's compendium on the Southern African fungi
(Doidge 1950). However, this is
not a valid name as discussed below. Doidge
(1950) also lists a collection
from Zimbabwe that was reported from Z. jujuba.
Distribution and prevalence of the disease in 2004 and 2005
The disease was first discovered in the southern parts of the park in late
March 2004, in the area of the camps Skukuza, Orpen, and Lower Sabie. The peak
of the disease was reached in May/June when it was detected to have spread
over a distance of about 200 km on the north-south axis and the entire
east-west extension of the park (Fig.
3). Infections remained clearly visible on trees until August. The
census taken at the two plots representing dense bushveld revealed that all 43
and 53 trees, respectively, in these plots were diseased. At the third plot
next to the dam, all 38 trees counted were diseased. This amounted to a
disease prevalence of 100 % in the region. The majority of trees at all three
plots were heavily infected, however medium-infected trees and trees with
hardly any infection could also be found.Line drawings of disease symptoms associated with C.
chevalieri infection. A. Symptoms caused by C.
chevalieri on a branch of Z. mucronata. B. Fruit
infection at the peak of its development. C. Later-stage fruit infection
causing the fruit to shrink and wrinkle. D. Basidiospores of C.
chevalieri.During the first half of 2005, rangers did not notice signs of the disease
in the park. Likewise, symptoms were not observed in roadside surveys of
Z. mucronata trees undertaken during April and June 2005. The three
reference plots were, therefore, closely investigated on foot. None of the
trees in the two bushveld reference plots that had displayed 100 % disease
incidence in the previous year showed fresh infections. However, viable spores
that could be germinated on MYP agar were obtained from two galls from
previous year infections. All of the trees were alive but many of the heavily
infected branches, easily detectable by the presence of old galls, had died.
There was also practically no fruit production in 2005, while the trees had
produced abundant fruit at the same time in the previous year. The reference
trees close to the dam had recovered more effectively than the trees at the
two other census sites. They also displayed abundant fruit production, and
small numbers of weak infections could be found on the fruits of six
trees.SEM pictures of C. chevalieri basidiospores. A–B.
Uniformly shaped spores with four longitudinal sections, each comprising
several cells. Warts on spore surface. C. Completely irregular spore form. D.
Spore consisting of five longitudinal units. Scale bars = 1 μm.Sequences were obtained from spores of different host organs (branches,
fruits) of different trees from different sample sites as well as from
cultures grown from spores. The sequences spanned the D1 – D3 region of
the nuc LSU rDNA with a length of about 1000 bp. All eight sequences obtained
were identical. They were also identical to the only available sequence of
C. chevalierin in GenBank that had been deposited for a study of the
Exobasidiales (Begerow ). This sequence was derived from a culture obtained
from material collected by Johannes van der Walt in 1990 around Skukuza camp,
also in KNP.The final alignment used for the phylogenetic analyses was restricted to
the D1/D2 region, due to the length of the sequences deposited in Genbank, and
comprised 508 base pairs. Tree topologies obtained by four different runs of
MC3 were identical. Tree topologies obtained by MC3
versus BioNJ were almost identical. The only difference was that the four
Laurobasidium specimens were resolved as a monophyletic group in
MC3, whereas in BioNJ Laurobasidium lauri was the sister
group to the three samples of Laurobasidium hachijoense together with
the Clinoconidium spp. as a whole. The posterior
probabilities and bootstrap values were similar (compare
Fig. 7). The most important
support values for this study are those for Cryptobasidiaceae (1.00
posterior probability / 99 % bootstrap) and those for the split between
Coniodictyum (1.0/100) and the rest of the Cryptobasidiaceae
(1.00/100).
Fig. 7.
Phylogeny of Cryptobasidiaceae showing the position of
Coniodictyum chevalieri based on Bayesian MC3 with GTRI+G
as base substitution model. The depicted phylogram was calculated from 9000
trees after the Markov chains had converged. MCMC (as fractions of one) and
bootstrap support values (derived by BioNJ with TIM+G as nucleotide
substitution model) are given above branches. Only values greater than 60 %
are shown.
Both Clinoconidium and Laurobasidium were resolved as
monophyletic by MC3, but with low support values, while in BioNJ
only Clinoconidium was monophyletic, however, also just weakly
supported by bootstrap support. Some intraspecific structure was observed
within Clinoconidium bullatum and C. cf. bullatum,
respectively. The monophyly of the outgroup genera Kordyana (1.0/100)
and Graphiola (0.96/100) was highly supported. However,
Dicellomyces did not form a monophyletic group with
Kordyana, which resides in the same family, the
Brachybasidiaceae, but with Graphiola, which resides in the
Graphiolaceae.Phylogeny of Cryptobasidiaceae showing the position of
Coniodictyum chevalieri based on Bayesian MC3 with GTRI+G
as base substitution model. The depicted phylogram was calculated from 9000
trees after the Markov chains had converged. MCMC (as fractions of one) and
bootstrap support values (derived by BioNJ with TIM+G as nucleotide
substitution model) are given above branches. Only values greater than 60 %
are shown.
DISCUSSION
Although it has long been known as geographically wide-spread in Africa,
C. chevalieri is an unusual fungus with poorly known ecology and
infection biology. This study emerged from an unusually severe outbreak of the
pathogen in an ecologically important and sensitive part of South Africa,
where the disease raised concern amongst rangers and naturalists. It provided
an opportunity to critically review what has been known about it, to clarify
some misconceptions of earlier studies, and it thus provides a foundation for
future studies. Coniodictyum has had a complicated systematic
history. It has had three different names assigned to it and it has also
resided in the Ascomycota for a period of time. Malençon
(1953), in his exceptionally
thorough study on the life cycle and systematic relationships of the fungus,
gave also a first account of the systematic history of C. chevalieri.
However, he was not aware how frequently the fungus had been collected in
South Africa. This led to incorrect conclusions regarding its levels of
occurrence.Coniodictyum chevalieri was first described in 1909 from Chad on
Zizyphus baclei = Z. mucronata
(Hariot & Patouillard
1909) where it had been collected on fruits in March and November
1903 by Chevalier. In 1910, Magnus
(1910) described Hyalodema
evansii based on material collected by Pole Evans in 1906 at Zoutpansberg
(Limpopo Province), South Africa, on Zizyphus sp., which was later
also identified as Z. mucronata
(Malençon 1953). Doidge
(1950) cited the fungus under
Coniodictyum evansii (Magnus) Höhn. without providing
justification for this new combination. This is especially important because
von Höhnel (1910, 1911)
himself argued strongly for the conspecificity of C. chevalieri and
H. evansii with C. chevalieri having priority, and therefore
never made a new combination for this fungus. Thus, the only evident
explanation for this inconsistency is that an error was inadvertently made
with the epithet of Magnus' invalid description being mistakenly attached to
the valid older genus name. Coniodictyum evansii
(Doidge 1950) is, therefore, a
synonymous nomen nudum for C. chevalieri.The affinities of the fungus now known as C. chevalieri were first
believed to be with the ascomycetes, and it was relegated to either the
Hyphomycetes Mucedineae (Hariot
& Patouillard 1909), the Melanconieae
(von Höhnel 1911,
Maublanc 1914) or the
Mucedinaceae, Moniliales (Doidge
1950). However, already von Höhnel
(1911) noted that some
features of the hypertrophic growth resembled that of Exobasidium.
When Malençon (1953)
received abundant fresh material of the fungus collected by Th. Monod close to
Dakar, Senegal, he performed an extensive morphological study concluding that
the “conidiophores” producing the abundance of white spores were
in reality basidia, and the spores hence basidiospores. He also, again,
connected Coniodictyum systematically with gall-producing fungi
described from Lauraceae of Central and South America in the genera
Botryoconis and Clinoconidium as Maublanc had proposed
before him, but then still under the ascomycetous Melanconieae
(Maublanc 1914). Thus, after
he had re-examined Botryoconis, Clinoconidium and
Drepanoconis, Malençon named the family
Cryptobasidieae (now Cryptobasidiaceae
(Donk 1956) in honour of Alfred
Lendner. This mycologist was the first to realise the basidiomycetous
affinities of one of its members and had introduced the name
Cryptobasidium (Lendner
1920), which was reduced to synonymy with Botryoconis. H.
Sydow, like Maublanc, originally retained Botryoconis in the
Melanconiaceae, but was convinced by Lendner's interpretations,
concluding “Ich glaube nun, daß Clinoconidium und
Botryoconis Basidiomyceten sind” and therefore transferred them
accordingly (Sydow 1925). Only
recently was Laurobasidium transferred from the
Exobasidiaceae to the Cryptobasidiaceae
(Begerow ).
Therefore, the Cryptobasidiaceae currently comprise five genera and
seven species (compare Hendrichs ).The Cryptobasidiaceae have recently been confirmed to be
monophyletic by Begerow et al.
(2002), but the statistical
support for the group in that study was low (obtaining a maximum of 59 %
bootstrap). Our analyses, however, show that the family is highly supported
both by bootstrap and Bayesian posterior probabilities. This result has
obviously arisen from the larger taxon sampling within the
Cryptobasidiaceae, while using the same gene region. This was
especially possible, because additional sequences of Botryoconis and
Laurobasidium had been deposited to GenBank by Nagao, Sato and
Kakishima in 2004.The only representative of the Cryptobasidiaceae in Africa, C.
chevalieri, is also unique in its host preference and in its ecological
occurrence in arid savanna biomes. This is markedly different to other members
of the Cryptobasidiaceae that inhabit moist sub-tropical and tropical
forests outside Africa attacking various genera in the laurel family while
C. chevalieri so far has only been reported with certainty from
Z. mucronata, a member of the Rhamnaceae. This unique
biology, regarding its biogeography, ecology and host specificity, is
reflected by the phylogenetic position of Coniodictyum, which is a
sister taxon separated from the other members of the family that parasitize
Lauraceae, by a long genetic distance and perfect support values
(Fig. 7).The potential of C. chevalieri to infect other members of the
genus Zizyphus should be considered. The report in Doidge
(1950) of C.
chevalieri infecting Z. jujuba (Z. mauritiana?) is interesting
in terms of the capacity of the pathogen to move to new hosts. However, the
validity of the report could not be tested in this study and is regarded as
rather doubtful. If the report were correct, it would have serious
implications for countries like China and India where Z. mauritania and Z.
jujuba are extensively grown for fruit production.Malençon (1953) was
convinced that Coniodictyum is a rare fungus (“en
réalité est un champignon peu commun”). This is because he
knew of no additional collections subsequent to the first collections from
Chad and South Africa in 1903 and 1906, respectively, and the material that
was sent to him from Senegal almost 50 years later. However, twelve
collections made in South Africa over a considerable geographic range (compare
above) and one in Zimbabwe between 1910 and 1938 documented in Doidge
(1950) clearly escaped
Malençon's notice. Thus, his statement regarding the rarity of the
fungus is based on the incorrect assumption that the fungus had been collected
only twice before he received the material from Dakar. Furthermore, the fungus
was also collected in more recent years in KNP by Johannes van der Walt in
1974 and again in 1990 close to the camp-sites “Skukuza” and
“Lower Sabie”, respectively. It is however important to note that
the fungus was almost absent from KNP in 2005, thus showing great fluctuations
in its prevalence in different years. At this stage we speculate that the
extensive spread of the fungus in 2004 was boosted by much higher rainfalls
between January and April 2004, compared to the same months in 2005 (data not
shown). Nevertheless, long-term observations are needed to either prove or
disprove this hypothesis.Another reason why C. chevalieri might not be as rare as
previously believed, is provided by old galls found on branches of Z.
mucronata. These indicate that the fungus had been present in Kruger Park
in recent years. The frequency of collections of C. chevalieri, is,
probably mainly determined by the number and activity of mycologists in areas
of Africa, where Z. mucronata grows and we assume that it most likely
could be found in the whole range of its host's distribution if extensively
looked for. The situation appears to be similar in the representatives of
Cryptobasidiaceae in tropical America where specimens have been
recollected in Costa Rica in the late 1990s after a period of about 60 years
absence of reports of these fungi
(Gómez ).In 2004, many Z. mucronata trees were so heavily stressed by the
production of large galls that we predicted large-scale death during the dry
winter months. However, almost all infected trees remained alive in 2005 and
appeared to have recovered well. This rapid recovery of Z. mucronata
from the severe infection by C. chevalieri in 2004 is consistent with
observations of rapid recovery and vigorous resprouting of Buffalo Thorn after
fire damage. However, hardly any fruit could be found on the trees the year
after they had been heavily infected at the two bushveld plots. We speculate
that stress due to infection by C. chevalieri reduced plant vigour
and consequently flower and fruit production in 2005. The fact that trees
close to the dam had recovered well and produced abundant fruit, despite their
being heavily infected in 2004, is probably due to favourable edaphic
conditions at this site, with higher water availability, which reduced the
impact of stress due to the disease.This study represents the first report of an epidemic caused by C.
chevalieri, a fungus previously believed to be extremely rare. Contrary
to views regarding its rarity, we were able to show that C.
chevalieri has been collected regularly, especially between 1906 and
1938, in various parts of South Africa. The infection status and the health of
the trees in reference plots in KNP is being monitored and it is hoped that
during coming years new knowledge concerning the ecology of the pathogen and
the conditions favouring its spread will emerge. These will be potentially
useful in developing hypotheses regarding modes of distribution and ecological
factors that might have an effect on the survival and spread of the
fungus.