Literature DB >> 18490557

Implications and management of pancreatic fistulas following pancreaticoduodenectomy: the Massachusetts General Hospital experience.

Gregory Veillette1, Ismael Dominguez, Cristina Ferrone, Sarah P Thayer, Deborah McGrath, Andrew L Warshaw, Carlos Fernández-del Castillo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the management and impact of pancreatic fistulas in a high-volume center.
DESIGN: Retrospective case series.
SETTING: Tertiary academic center. PATIENTS: Five hundred eighty-one consecutive patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy from January 2001 through June 2006. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Development of a pancreatic fistula (defined as > 30 mL of amylase-rich fluid from drains on or after postoperative day 7, or discharge with surgical drains in place, regardless of amount); the need for additional interventions or total parenteral nutrition; other morbidity; and mortality.
RESULTS: Seventy-five patients (12.9%) developed a pancreatic fistula. Fistulas were managed with gradual withdrawal of surgical drains. This allowed for patient discharge and eventual closure at a mean of 18 days in 38.7% of cases; these were classified as low-impact fistulas. The remaining 46 patients (61.3%) had an associated abscess, required percutaneous drainage or total parenteral nutrition, or developed bleeding; these were classified as high-impact fistulas and closed a mean of 35 days after surgery. Standard 30-day in-hospital mortality was 1.9% for all pancreaticoduodenectomies and 6.7% for those who developed a pancreatic fistula. The overall fistula-related mortality was 9.3% (7 patients), all but 1 of which was related to major hemorrhage.
CONCLUSIONS: More than one-third of pancreatic fistulas are clinically insignificant (low impact). The remaining 60% of fistulas have a high clinical impact and nearly an 8-fold increase in overall mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18490557      PMCID: PMC3806102          DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.143.5.476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  24 in total

1.  The potent somatostatin analogue vapreotide does not decrease pancreas-specific complications after elective pancreatectomy: a prospective, multicenter, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Micheal G Sarr
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Pancreatic fistula and relative mortality in malignant disease after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Review and statistical meta-analysis regarding 15 years of literature.

Authors:  F G Bartoli; G B Arnone; G Ravera; V Bachi
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.480

3.  Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization.

Authors:  J H Balcom; D W Rattner; A L Warshaw; Y Chang; C Fernandez-del Castillo
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2001-04

4.  Does prophylactic octreotide decrease the rates of pancreatic fistula and other complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  C J Yeo; J L Cameron; K D Lillemoe; P K Sauter; J Coleman; T A Sohn; K A Campbell; M A Choti
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes.

Authors:  C J Yeo; J L Cameron; T A Sohn; K D Lillemoe; H A Pitt; M A Talamini; R H Hruban; S E Ord; P K Sauter; J Coleman; M L Zahurak; L B Grochow; R A Abrams
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Delayed hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Seong Ho Choi; Hyoun Jong Moon; Jin Seok Heo; Jae Won Joh; Yong Il Kim
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Conservative management of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy.

Authors:  Nicolas Munoz-Bongrand; Alain Sauvanet; Alban Denys; Annie Sibert; Valérie Vilgrain; Jacques Belghiti
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Octreotide does not prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula or mortality following Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Sean P Barnett; Pamela J Hodul; Steven Creech; Jack Pickleman; Gerard V Arahna
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 0.688

9.  A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  C J Yeo; J L Cameron; M M Maher; P K Sauter; M L Zahurak; M A Talamini; K D Lillemoe; H A Pitt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Standards for pancreatic resection in the 1990s.

Authors:  C Fernández-del Castillo; D W Rattner; A L Warshaw
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1995-03
View more
  36 in total

1.  Drain data to predict clinically relevant pancreatic fistula.

Authors:  Daniel J Moskovic; Sally E Hodges; Meng-Fen Wu; F Charles Brunicardi; Susan G Hilsenbeck; William E Fisher
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  The need of a severity scoring system for postoperative pancreatic fistulas.

Authors:  Sergio Pedrazzoli; Alen Silvio Canton; Cosimo Sperti
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Prevention, evaluation, and treatment of leaks after pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Matthews
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-04-17       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Pancreas: Postoperative pancreatic fistula: use of enteral nutrition.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Giuseppe Malleo
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 5.  Iatrogenic hepatopancreaticobiliary injuries: a review.

Authors:  Prasanti G Vachhani; Alexander Copelan; Erick M Remer; Baljendra Kapoor
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 6.  Preoperative imaging evaluation of pancreatic pathologies for the objective prediction of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Yoshitsugu Tajima; Yasunari Kawabata; Noriyuki Hirahara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  The North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Consensus Paper on the Surgical Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  James R Howe; Nipun B Merchant; Claudius Conrad; Xavier M Keutgen; Julie Hallet; Jeffrey A Drebin; Rebecca M Minter; Terry C Lairmore; Jennifer F Tseng; Herbert J Zeh; Steven K Libutti; Gagandeep Singh; Jeffrey E Lee; Thomas A Hope; Michelle K Kim; Yusuf Menda; Thorvardur R Halfdanarson; Jennifer A Chan; Rodney F Pommier
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 3.327

8.  High performing whipple patients: factors associated with short length of stay after open pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Grace C Lee; Zhi Ven Fong; Cristina R Ferrone; Sarah P Thayer; Andrew L Warshaw; Keith D Lillemoe; Carlos Fernández-del Castillo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Pancreatic anastomosis disruption seven years postpancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Walid Faraj; Zaki Abou Zahr; Deborah Mukherji; Ahmad Zaghal; Mohamed Khalife
Journal:  Case Rep Med       Date:  2010-08-16

Review 10.  Predictive factors for pancreatic fistula following pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Matthew T McMillan; Charles M Vollmer
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.