Literature DB >> 18489192

Challenging a dogma of exercise physiology: does an incremental exercise test for valid VO 2 max determination really need to last between 8 and 12 minutes?

Adrian W Midgley1, David J Bentley, Hans Luttikholt, Lars R McNaughton, Gregoire P Millet.   

Abstract

A widely cited recommendation is that to elicit valid maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2 max)) values, incremental exercise tests should last between 8 and 12 minutes. However, this recommendation originated from the findings of a single experimental study conducted by Buchfuhrer et al. in 1983. Although this study is an important contribution to scientific knowledge, it should not be viewed as sufficient evidence to support the recommendation for eliciting valid VO(2 max) values. At least eight studies have reported that durations as short as 5 minutes and as long as 26 minutes elicit VO(2 max) values similar to those derived from tests of 8-12 minutes' duration. Two studies reported that the shorter test protocols elicited significantly higher VO(2 max) values in untrained men and women. In three studies that reported significantly higher VO(2 max) values determined during tests of 8-12 minutes than during more prolonged tests, the prolonged tests were associated with maximal treadmill grades of 20-25%, compared with 6-10% in the shorter tests. Therefore, intolerable treadmill grades, rather than the prolonged test duration, may have limited the ability to elicit VO(2 max). In view of the available evidence, test administrators, reviewers and journal editors should not view 8-12 minutes' duration for incremental exercise tests as obligatory for valid VO(2 max) determination. Current evidence suggests that to elicit valid VO(2 max) values, cycle ergometer tests should last between 7 and 26 minutes and treadmill tests between 5 and 26 minutes. This is dependent on the qualification that short tests are preceded by an adequate warm-up and that treadmill grades do not exceed 15%. Current research is too limited to indicate appropriate test duration ranges for discontinuous test protocols, or protocols incorporating high treadmill grades.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18489192     DOI: 10.2165/00007256-200838060-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Med        ISSN: 0112-1642            Impact factor:   11.136


  43 in total

1.  Aerobic determinants of the decline in preferred walking speed in healthy, active 65- and 80-year-olds.

Authors:  Davide Malatesta; David Simar; Yves Dauvilliers; Robin Candau; Helmi Ben Saad; Christian Préfaut; Corinne Caillaud
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2003-12-10       Impact factor: 3.657

2.  Reproducibility of time at or near VO2max during intermittent treadmill running.

Authors:  A W Midgley; L R McNaughton; S Carroll
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 3.118

3.  Respiratory gas exchange during treadmill exercise testing: reproducibility and comparison of different exercise protocols.

Authors:  J E Nordrehaug; R Danielsen; L Stangeland; G A Rosland; H Vik-Mo
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 1.713

4.  The effect of stage duration on the calculation of peak VO2 during cycle ergometry.

Authors:  D Bishop; D G Jenkins; L T Mackinnon
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.319

5.  Evaluation of a specific activity questionnaire to predict mortality in men referred for exercise testing.

Authors:  Paul McAuley; Jonathan Myers; Joshua Abella; Victor Froelicher
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.749

6.  Comparison of 3 protocols of determination of direct VO2max amongst 12 sportsmen.

Authors:  M Potiron-Josse
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 1.637

7.  Physiological comparisons among three maximal treadmill exercise protocols in trained and untrained individuals.

Authors:  J Kang; E C Chaloupka; M A Mastrangelo; G B Biren; R J Robertson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Effect of ramp slope on ventilation thresholds and VO2peak in male cyclists.

Authors:  S B Weston; A B Gray; D A Schneider; G C Gass
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.118

9.  Optimizing the exercise protocol for cardiopulmonary assessment.

Authors:  M J Buchfuhrer; J E Hansen; T E Robinson; D Y Sue; K Wasserman; B J Whipp
Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol       Date:  1983-11

10.  Interval training at VO2max: effects on aerobic performance and overtraining markers.

Authors:  V L Billat; B Flechet; B Petit; G Muriaux; J P Koralsztein
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.411

View more
  38 in total

1.  A new incremental test for VO₂max accurate measurement by increasing VO₂max plateau duration, allowing the investigation of its limiting factors.

Authors:  Hélène Petot; Renaud Meilland; Laurence Le Moyec; Laurence Mille-Hamard; Véronique L Billat
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Effects of acid-base balance and high or low intensity exercise on VEGF and bFGF.

Authors:  Patrick Wahl; Christoph Zinner; Silvia Achtzehn; Michael Behringer; Wilhelm Bloch; Joachim Mester
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  Sprint Running Performance Monitoring: Methodological and Practical Considerations.

Authors:  Thomas Haugen; Martin Buchheit
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Indirect estimation of VO2max in athletes by ACSM's equation: valid or not?

Authors:  N Koutlianos; E Dimitros; T Metaxas; M Cansiz; As Deligiannis; E Kouidi
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 0.471

5.  .VO2max is not altered by self-pacing during incremental exercise.

Authors:  Weerapong Chidnok; Fred J Dimenna; Stephen J Bailey; Mark Burnley; Daryl P Wilkerson; Anni Vanhatalo; Andrew M Jones
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Ramp-incremented and RPE-clamped test protocols elicit similar VO2max values in trained cyclists.

Authors:  Allison M Straub; Adrian W Midgley; Gerald S Zavorsky; Angela R Hillman
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Differences in whole-body fat oxidation kinetics between cycling and running.

Authors:  Xavier Chenevière; Davide Malatesta; Boris Gojanovic; Fabio Borrani
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Modality determines VO2max achieved in self-paced exercise tests: validation with the Bruce protocol.

Authors:  Nicholas J Hanson; Cory M Scheadler; Taylor L Lee; Noah C Neuenfeldt; Timothy J Michael; Michael G Miller
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 9.  Physiological differences between cycling and running: lessons from triathletes.

Authors:  Gregoire P Millet; V E Vleck; D J Bentley
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 10.  Criterion-Related Validity of the 20-M Shuttle Run Test for Estimating Cardiorespiratory Fitness: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Mayorga-Vega; Pablo Aguilar-Soto; Jesús Viciana
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 2.988

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.